The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Neurovascular Compression Before Microvascular Decompression in Trigeminal Neuralgia

Risheng Xu, Sumil K. Nair, Divyaansh Raj, Joshua Materi, Raymond J. So, Sachin K. Gujar, Judy Huang, Ari M Blitz, Michael Lim, Haris I. Sair, Chetan Bettegowda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard component of the preoperative clinical workup for patients before microvascular decompression (MVD). However, its ability to accurately exclude neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve is not well understood. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1020 patients with available preoperative MRI data before microvascular decompression. General patient demographics and clinical characteristics were collected for each case. We recorded both evidence of neurovascular conflict on preoperative MRI radiology notes and intraoperative compression from operative notes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were determined for general MRI, high-resolution MRI, and non–high resolution. Results: Overall, preoperative MRI before MVD showed a sensitivity of 75.8%, specificity of 65.8%, positive predictive value of 92.4%, and negative predictive value of 33.3% in predicting neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve. In particular, MRI was unable to identify 21.0% cases of sole arterial compression, 42.5% cases of sole venous compression, and combined arterial and venous compression in 18.5% of cases. A total of 958 patients (93.9%) underwent high-resolution preoperative MRI with skull base sequences. This imaging showed a sensitivity of 75.6%, specificity of 66.9%, positive predictive value of 92.5% and a negative predictive value of 33.4% in predicting trigeminal nerve neurovascular compression. Non–high-resolution MRI showed a sensitivity of 78.8%, specificity of 50.0%, positive predictive value of 89.1%, and negative predictive value of 31.3%. The negative predictive values of general, high-resolution, and non–high-resolution MRIs were all <50%. Conclusions: Preoperative MRI may offer a high predictive value for neurovascular conflict and should be part of the standard preoperative care workup for patients with trigeminal neuralgia. However, lack of neurovascular conflict on preoperative imaging is not sufficient to exclude patients from undergoing MVD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e216-e222
JournalWorld neurosurgery
Volume168
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Microvascular decompression
  • Neurovascular compression
  • Trigeminal neuralgia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Neurovascular Compression Before Microvascular Decompression in Trigeminal Neuralgia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this