The role of open stone surgery in 2002

Brian Matlaga, Dean G. Assimos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: At one time, the standard treatment for patients with renal and ureteral calculi was open surgical lithotomy. Advances made in the past two decades have dramatically changed the way in which patients with urinary calculi are treated. In light of this present trend towards minimally invasive therapies, it is important to define which patients might be best served by undergoing an open surgical procedure for stone treatment. Materials and Methods: The authors review the current indications for open surgical removal of urinary calculi. Particular attention is paid to developments described in recent literature. Results: The development of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, ureteroscopic stone removal, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has greatly diminished the role of open surgery in the treatment of urinary calculi. While most patients may be treated via these less invasive modalities, there are some patients to whom an open surgical procedure is the optimal therapy. Conclusions: There remains a role, albeit small, for open surgical stone removal. The patients who benefit from these procedures generally have extremely complex calculous disease with associated anatomic and physiologic derangements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-92
Number of pages6
JournalBrazilian Journal of Urology
Volume28
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Calculi
Ureteral Calculi
Therapeutics
Kidney Calculi
Lithotripsy

Keywords

  • Kidney
  • Kidney calculi
  • Surgery
  • Treatment
  • Urolithiasis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

The role of open stone surgery in 2002. / Matlaga, Brian; Assimos, Dean G.

In: Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2002, p. 87-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matlaga, B & Assimos, DG 2002, 'The role of open stone surgery in 2002', Brazilian Journal of Urology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 87-92.
Matlaga, Brian ; Assimos, Dean G. / The role of open stone surgery in 2002. In: Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2002 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 87-92.
@article{f757aaabcbb14c78a9ee59ac32ed738c,
title = "The role of open stone surgery in 2002",
abstract = "Introduction: At one time, the standard treatment for patients with renal and ureteral calculi was open surgical lithotomy. Advances made in the past two decades have dramatically changed the way in which patients with urinary calculi are treated. In light of this present trend towards minimally invasive therapies, it is important to define which patients might be best served by undergoing an open surgical procedure for stone treatment. Materials and Methods: The authors review the current indications for open surgical removal of urinary calculi. Particular attention is paid to developments described in recent literature. Results: The development of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, ureteroscopic stone removal, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has greatly diminished the role of open surgery in the treatment of urinary calculi. While most patients may be treated via these less invasive modalities, there are some patients to whom an open surgical procedure is the optimal therapy. Conclusions: There remains a role, albeit small, for open surgical stone removal. The patients who benefit from these procedures generally have extremely complex calculous disease with associated anatomic and physiologic derangements.",
keywords = "Kidney, Kidney calculi, Surgery, Treatment, Urolithiasis",
author = "Brian Matlaga and Assimos, {Dean G.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "87--92",
journal = "International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology",
issn = "1677-5538",
publisher = "Brazilian Society of Urology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of open stone surgery in 2002

AU - Matlaga, Brian

AU - Assimos, Dean G.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Introduction: At one time, the standard treatment for patients with renal and ureteral calculi was open surgical lithotomy. Advances made in the past two decades have dramatically changed the way in which patients with urinary calculi are treated. In light of this present trend towards minimally invasive therapies, it is important to define which patients might be best served by undergoing an open surgical procedure for stone treatment. Materials and Methods: The authors review the current indications for open surgical removal of urinary calculi. Particular attention is paid to developments described in recent literature. Results: The development of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, ureteroscopic stone removal, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has greatly diminished the role of open surgery in the treatment of urinary calculi. While most patients may be treated via these less invasive modalities, there are some patients to whom an open surgical procedure is the optimal therapy. Conclusions: There remains a role, albeit small, for open surgical stone removal. The patients who benefit from these procedures generally have extremely complex calculous disease with associated anatomic and physiologic derangements.

AB - Introduction: At one time, the standard treatment for patients with renal and ureteral calculi was open surgical lithotomy. Advances made in the past two decades have dramatically changed the way in which patients with urinary calculi are treated. In light of this present trend towards minimally invasive therapies, it is important to define which patients might be best served by undergoing an open surgical procedure for stone treatment. Materials and Methods: The authors review the current indications for open surgical removal of urinary calculi. Particular attention is paid to developments described in recent literature. Results: The development of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, ureteroscopic stone removal, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has greatly diminished the role of open surgery in the treatment of urinary calculi. While most patients may be treated via these less invasive modalities, there are some patients to whom an open surgical procedure is the optimal therapy. Conclusions: There remains a role, albeit small, for open surgical stone removal. The patients who benefit from these procedures generally have extremely complex calculous disease with associated anatomic and physiologic derangements.

KW - Kidney

KW - Kidney calculi

KW - Surgery

KW - Treatment

KW - Urolithiasis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036264379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036264379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 87

EP - 92

JO - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

JF - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

SN - 1677-5538

IS - 2

ER -