The retained intrapericardial sponge: Value of the lateral chest radiograph

William W. Scott, Douglas P. Beall, Paul S. Wheeler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to identify reasons for the difficulty in diagnosing retained intrapericardial sponges and to determine ways to improve diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION. All three intrapericardially retained sponges were in the posterior pericardium, a region not visible to the surgeon. Radiographic detection of the sponges on standard anteroposterior projections is difficult because of exposure factors, other confusing linear markers, and metallic densities such as sternal sutures. However, knowledge of the typical location of a lost sponge and use of lateral radiographic projections may aid in early detection of this rare complication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-597
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume171
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint

Porifera
Thorax
Pericardium
Sutures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Scott, W. W., Beall, D. P., & Wheeler, P. S. (1998). The retained intrapericardial sponge: Value of the lateral chest radiograph. American Journal of Roentgenology, 171(3), 595-597.

The retained intrapericardial sponge : Value of the lateral chest radiograph. / Scott, William W.; Beall, Douglas P.; Wheeler, Paul S.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 171, No. 3, 09.1998, p. 595-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, WW, Beall, DP & Wheeler, PS 1998, 'The retained intrapericardial sponge: Value of the lateral chest radiograph', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 595-597.
Scott, William W. ; Beall, Douglas P. ; Wheeler, Paul S. / The retained intrapericardial sponge : Value of the lateral chest radiograph. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1998 ; Vol. 171, No. 3. pp. 595-597.
@article{064f4212f63949518241300b46c3d0ef,
title = "The retained intrapericardial sponge: Value of the lateral chest radiograph",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to identify reasons for the difficulty in diagnosing retained intrapericardial sponges and to determine ways to improve diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION. All three intrapericardially retained sponges were in the posterior pericardium, a region not visible to the surgeon. Radiographic detection of the sponges on standard anteroposterior projections is difficult because of exposure factors, other confusing linear markers, and metallic densities such as sternal sutures. However, knowledge of the typical location of a lost sponge and use of lateral radiographic projections may aid in early detection of this rare complication.",
author = "Scott, {William W.} and Beall, {Douglas P.} and Wheeler, {Paul S.}",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "595--597",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The retained intrapericardial sponge

T2 - Value of the lateral chest radiograph

AU - Scott, William W.

AU - Beall, Douglas P.

AU - Wheeler, Paul S.

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to identify reasons for the difficulty in diagnosing retained intrapericardial sponges and to determine ways to improve diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION. All three intrapericardially retained sponges were in the posterior pericardium, a region not visible to the surgeon. Radiographic detection of the sponges on standard anteroposterior projections is difficult because of exposure factors, other confusing linear markers, and metallic densities such as sternal sutures. However, knowledge of the typical location of a lost sponge and use of lateral radiographic projections may aid in early detection of this rare complication.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to identify reasons for the difficulty in diagnosing retained intrapericardial sponges and to determine ways to improve diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION. All three intrapericardially retained sponges were in the posterior pericardium, a region not visible to the surgeon. Radiographic detection of the sponges on standard anteroposterior projections is difficult because of exposure factors, other confusing linear markers, and metallic densities such as sternal sutures. However, knowledge of the typical location of a lost sponge and use of lateral radiographic projections may aid in early detection of this rare complication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031722866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031722866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9725280

AN - SCOPUS:0031722866

VL - 171

SP - 595

EP - 597

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -