Relación entre el modelo de cinco factores y las dimensiones del trastorno de personalidad latente del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, cuarta edición

Translated title of the contribution: The relationship between the five-factor model and latent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition personality disorder dimensions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study compared the latent structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition personality disorders (PDs) with the 5-factor model (FFM) of general personality dimensions. The subjects in the study were 742 community-residing individuals who participated in the Hopkins Epidemiology of Personality Disorders Study. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition PD traits were assessed by psychologists using the International Personality Disorder Examination, and PD dimensions were derived previously using dichotomous factor analysis. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory, a measure of the FFM, was administered to all subjects. The relationship between the 2 sets of personality-related constructs was examined using a construct validity framework and also using Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple linear regression models, and spline regression models. The 5 PD factors each exhibited small to moderate correlations with several NEO dimensions; together, the NEO domain and facet scores explained a fifth to a third of the variance in PD dimensions. Examples of nonlinear relationships between the personality dimensions were identified. There is a modest correspondence between the PD dimensions and FFM traits, and the traits of FFM only partially explain the variance of the PDs. Dimensional measures of general personality may be a suitable alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. Whether additional maladaptive traits would better define the domain of PDs remains an important objective for future research.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)153-161
Number of pages9
JournalPsiquiatria Biologica
Volume15
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Personality Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Personality
Linear Models
Personality Inventory
Statistical Factor Analysis
Epidemiology
Psychology

Keywords

  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  • Five-factor model
  • Personality disorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{6399026edf614800a378846eaf5ba28c,
title = "Relaci{\'o}n entre el modelo de cinco factores y las dimensiones del trastorno de personalidad latente del Manual Diagn{\'o}stico y Estad{\'i}stico de los Trastornos Mentales, cuarta edici{\'o}n",
abstract = "This study compared the latent structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition personality disorders (PDs) with the 5-factor model (FFM) of general personality dimensions. The subjects in the study were 742 community-residing individuals who participated in the Hopkins Epidemiology of Personality Disorders Study. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition PD traits were assessed by psychologists using the International Personality Disorder Examination, and PD dimensions were derived previously using dichotomous factor analysis. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory, a measure of the FFM, was administered to all subjects. The relationship between the 2 sets of personality-related constructs was examined using a construct validity framework and also using Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple linear regression models, and spline regression models. The 5 PD factors each exhibited small to moderate correlations with several NEO dimensions; together, the NEO domain and facet scores explained a fifth to a third of the variance in PD dimensions. Examples of nonlinear relationships between the personality dimensions were identified. There is a modest correspondence between the PD dimensions and FFM traits, and the traits of FFM only partially explain the variance of the PDs. Dimensional measures of general personality may be a suitable alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. Whether additional maladaptive traits would better define the domain of PDs remains an important objective for future research.",
keywords = "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Five-factor model, Personality disorder",
author = "Gerald Nestadt and Paul Costa and Hsu, {Fang Chi} and Jack Samuels and Bienvenu, {Oscar J} and Eaton, {William W}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "15",
pages = "153--161",
journal = "Psiquiatria Biologica",
issn = "1134-5934",
publisher = "Associacao Brasileira de Psiquiatria Biologica",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relación entre el modelo de cinco factores y las dimensiones del trastorno de personalidad latente del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, cuarta edición

AU - Nestadt, Gerald

AU - Costa, Paul

AU - Hsu, Fang Chi

AU - Samuels, Jack

AU - Bienvenu, Oscar J

AU - Eaton, William W

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - This study compared the latent structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition personality disorders (PDs) with the 5-factor model (FFM) of general personality dimensions. The subjects in the study were 742 community-residing individuals who participated in the Hopkins Epidemiology of Personality Disorders Study. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition PD traits were assessed by psychologists using the International Personality Disorder Examination, and PD dimensions were derived previously using dichotomous factor analysis. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory, a measure of the FFM, was administered to all subjects. The relationship between the 2 sets of personality-related constructs was examined using a construct validity framework and also using Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple linear regression models, and spline regression models. The 5 PD factors each exhibited small to moderate correlations with several NEO dimensions; together, the NEO domain and facet scores explained a fifth to a third of the variance in PD dimensions. Examples of nonlinear relationships between the personality dimensions were identified. There is a modest correspondence between the PD dimensions and FFM traits, and the traits of FFM only partially explain the variance of the PDs. Dimensional measures of general personality may be a suitable alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. Whether additional maladaptive traits would better define the domain of PDs remains an important objective for future research.

AB - This study compared the latent structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition personality disorders (PDs) with the 5-factor model (FFM) of general personality dimensions. The subjects in the study were 742 community-residing individuals who participated in the Hopkins Epidemiology of Personality Disorders Study. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition PD traits were assessed by psychologists using the International Personality Disorder Examination, and PD dimensions were derived previously using dichotomous factor analysis. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory, a measure of the FFM, was administered to all subjects. The relationship between the 2 sets of personality-related constructs was examined using a construct validity framework and also using Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple linear regression models, and spline regression models. The 5 PD factors each exhibited small to moderate correlations with several NEO dimensions; together, the NEO domain and facet scores explained a fifth to a third of the variance in PD dimensions. Examples of nonlinear relationships between the personality dimensions were identified. There is a modest correspondence between the PD dimensions and FFM traits, and the traits of FFM only partially explain the variance of the PDs. Dimensional measures of general personality may be a suitable alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. Whether additional maladaptive traits would better define the domain of PDs remains an important objective for future research.

KW - Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

KW - Five-factor model

KW - Personality disorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849091065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849091065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60849091065

VL - 15

SP - 153

EP - 161

JO - Psiquiatria Biologica

JF - Psiquiatria Biologica

SN - 1134-5934

IS - 5

ER -