The prostate health index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer

Stacy Loeb, Martin G. Sanda, Dennis L. Broyles, Sanghyuk S. Shin, Chris H. Bangma, John T. Wei, Alan W. Partin, George G. Klee, Kevin M. Slawin, Leonard S. Marks, Ron H.N. Van Schaik, Daniel W. Chan, Lori J. Sokoll, Amabelle B. Cruz, Isaac A. Mizrahi, William J. Catalona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose The Prostate Health Index (phi) is a new test combining total, free and [-2]proPSA into a single score. It was recently approved by the FDA and is now commercially available in the U.S., Europe and Australia. We investigate whether phi improves specificity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and can help reduce prostate cancer over diagnosis. Materials and Methods From a multicenter prospective trial we identified 658 men age 50 years or older with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination who underwent prostate biopsy. In this population we compared the performance of prostate specific antigen, % free prostate specific antigen, [-2]proPSA and phi to predict biopsy results and, specifically, the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiple criteria. Results The Prostate Health Index was significantly higher in men with Gleason 7 or greater and "Epstein significant" cancer. On receiver operating characteristic analysis phi had the highest AUC for overall prostate cancer (AUCs phi 0.708, percent free prostate specific antigen 0.648, [-2]proPSA 0.550 and prostate specific antigen 0.516), Gleason 7 or greater (AUCs phi 0.707, percent free prostate specific antigen 0.661, [-2]proPSA 0.558, prostate specific antigen 0.551) and significant prostate cancer (AUCs phi 0.698, percent free prostate specific antigen 0.654, [-2]proPSA 0.550, prostate specific antigen 0.549). At the 90% sensitivity cut point for phi (a score less than 28.6) 30.1% of patients could have been spared an unnecessary biopsy for benign disease or insignificant prostate cancer compared to 21.7% using percent free prostate specific antigen. Conclusions The new phi test outperforms its individual components of total, free and [-2]proPSA for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer. Phi may be useful as part of a multivariable approach to reduce prostate biopsies and over diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1163-1169
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume193
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Keywords

  • biological markers
  • early detection of cancer
  • prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The prostate health index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this