The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)

Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines

Timothy R. Deer, Jason E. Pope, Salim M. Hayek, Anjum Bux, Eric Buchser, Sam Eldabe, Jose A. De Andrés, Michael Erdek, Dennis Patin, Jay S. Grider, Daniel M. Doleys, Marilyn S. Jacobs, Tony L. Yaksh, Lawrence Poree, Mark S. Wallace, Joshua Prager, Richard Rauck, Oscar DeLeon, Sudhir Diwan, Steven M. Falowski & 18 others Helena M. Gazelka, Philip Kim, Michael Leong, Robert M. Levy, Gladstone McDowell, Porter McRoberts, Ramana Naidu, Samir Narouze, Christophe Perruchoud, Steven M. Rosen, William S. Rosenberg, Michael Saulino, Peter Staats, Lisa J. Stearns, Dean Willis, Elliot Krames, Marc Huntoon, Nagy Mekhail

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Introduction: Pain treatment is best performed when a patient-centric, safety-based philosophy is used to determine an algorithmic process to guide care. Since 2007, the International Neuromodulation Society has organized a group of experts to evaluate evidence and create a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) to guide practice. Methods: The current PACC update was designed to address the deficiencies and innovations emerging since the previous PACC publication of 2012. An extensive literature search identified publications between January 15, 2007 and November 22, 2015 and authors contributed additional relevant sources. After reviewing the literature, the panel convened to determine evidence levels and degrees of recommendations for intrathecal therapy. This meeting served as the basis for consensus development, which was ranked as strong, moderate or weak. Algorithms were developed for intrathecal medication choices to treat nociceptive and neuropathic pain for patients with cancer, terminal illness, and noncancer pain, with either localized or diffuse pain. Results: The PACC has developed an algorithmic process for several aspects of intrathecal drug delivery to promote safe and efficacious evidence-based care. Consensus opinion, based on expertise, was used to fill gaps in evidence. Thirty-one consensus points emerged from the panel considerations. Conclusion: New algorithms and guidance have been established to improve care with the use of intrathecal drug delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-132
Number of pages37
JournalNeuromodulation
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Infusion Pumps
Practice Guidelines
Consensus
Pain
Publications
Nociceptive Pain
Neuralgia
Patient Safety
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • consensus
  • fixed rate pump
  • intrathecal drug delivery
  • neuropathic pain
  • nonmalignant pain
  • opioid
  • programmable pump
  • psychological evaluation
  • safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) : Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines. / Deer, Timothy R.; Pope, Jason E.; Hayek, Salim M.; Bux, Anjum; Buchser, Eric; Eldabe, Sam; De Andrés, Jose A.; Erdek, Michael; Patin, Dennis; Grider, Jay S.; Doleys, Daniel M.; Jacobs, Marilyn S.; Yaksh, Tony L.; Poree, Lawrence; Wallace, Mark S.; Prager, Joshua; Rauck, Richard; DeLeon, Oscar; Diwan, Sudhir; Falowski, Steven M.; Gazelka, Helena M.; Kim, Philip; Leong, Michael; Levy, Robert M.; McDowell, Gladstone; McRoberts, Porter; Naidu, Ramana; Narouze, Samir; Perruchoud, Christophe; Rosen, Steven M.; Rosenberg, William S.; Saulino, Michael; Staats, Peter; Stearns, Lisa J.; Willis, Dean; Krames, Elliot; Huntoon, Marc; Mekhail, Nagy.

In: Neuromodulation, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 96-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Deer, TR, Pope, JE, Hayek, SM, Bux, A, Buchser, E, Eldabe, S, De Andrés, JA, Erdek, M, Patin, D, Grider, JS, Doleys, DM, Jacobs, MS, Yaksh, TL, Poree, L, Wallace, MS, Prager, J, Rauck, R, DeLeon, O, Diwan, S, Falowski, SM, Gazelka, HM, Kim, P, Leong, M, Levy, RM, McDowell, G, McRoberts, P, Naidu, R, Narouze, S, Perruchoud, C, Rosen, SM, Rosenberg, WS, Saulino, M, Staats, P, Stearns, LJ, Willis, D, Krames, E, Huntoon, M & Mekhail, N 2017, 'The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines', Neuromodulation, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 96-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12538
Deer, Timothy R. ; Pope, Jason E. ; Hayek, Salim M. ; Bux, Anjum ; Buchser, Eric ; Eldabe, Sam ; De Andrés, Jose A. ; Erdek, Michael ; Patin, Dennis ; Grider, Jay S. ; Doleys, Daniel M. ; Jacobs, Marilyn S. ; Yaksh, Tony L. ; Poree, Lawrence ; Wallace, Mark S. ; Prager, Joshua ; Rauck, Richard ; DeLeon, Oscar ; Diwan, Sudhir ; Falowski, Steven M. ; Gazelka, Helena M. ; Kim, Philip ; Leong, Michael ; Levy, Robert M. ; McDowell, Gladstone ; McRoberts, Porter ; Naidu, Ramana ; Narouze, Samir ; Perruchoud, Christophe ; Rosen, Steven M. ; Rosenberg, William S. ; Saulino, Michael ; Staats, Peter ; Stearns, Lisa J. ; Willis, Dean ; Krames, Elliot ; Huntoon, Marc ; Mekhail, Nagy. / The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) : Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines. In: Neuromodulation. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 96-132.
@article{067a3d9975bd40f1b1a870c429ae05dd,
title = "The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines",
abstract = "Introduction: Pain treatment is best performed when a patient-centric, safety-based philosophy is used to determine an algorithmic process to guide care. Since 2007, the International Neuromodulation Society has organized a group of experts to evaluate evidence and create a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) to guide practice. Methods: The current PACC update was designed to address the deficiencies and innovations emerging since the previous PACC publication of 2012. An extensive literature search identified publications between January 15, 2007 and November 22, 2015 and authors contributed additional relevant sources. After reviewing the literature, the panel convened to determine evidence levels and degrees of recommendations for intrathecal therapy. This meeting served as the basis for consensus development, which was ranked as strong, moderate or weak. Algorithms were developed for intrathecal medication choices to treat nociceptive and neuropathic pain for patients with cancer, terminal illness, and noncancer pain, with either localized or diffuse pain. Results: The PACC has developed an algorithmic process for several aspects of intrathecal drug delivery to promote safe and efficacious evidence-based care. Consensus opinion, based on expertise, was used to fill gaps in evidence. Thirty-one consensus points emerged from the panel considerations. Conclusion: New algorithms and guidance have been established to improve care with the use of intrathecal drug delivery.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, consensus, fixed rate pump, intrathecal drug delivery, neuropathic pain, nonmalignant pain, opioid, programmable pump, psychological evaluation, safety",
author = "Deer, {Timothy R.} and Pope, {Jason E.} and Hayek, {Salim M.} and Anjum Bux and Eric Buchser and Sam Eldabe and {De Andr{\'e}s}, {Jose A.} and Michael Erdek and Dennis Patin and Grider, {Jay S.} and Doleys, {Daniel M.} and Jacobs, {Marilyn S.} and Yaksh, {Tony L.} and Lawrence Poree and Wallace, {Mark S.} and Joshua Prager and Richard Rauck and Oscar DeLeon and Sudhir Diwan and Falowski, {Steven M.} and Gazelka, {Helena M.} and Philip Kim and Michael Leong and Levy, {Robert M.} and Gladstone McDowell and Porter McRoberts and Ramana Naidu and Samir Narouze and Christophe Perruchoud and Rosen, {Steven M.} and Rosenberg, {William S.} and Michael Saulino and Peter Staats and Stearns, {Lisa J.} and Dean Willis and Elliot Krames and Marc Huntoon and Nagy Mekhail",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ner.12538",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "96--132",
journal = "Neuromodulation",
issn = "1094-7159",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)

T2 - Recommendations on Intrathecal Drug Infusion Systems Best Practices and Guidelines

AU - Deer, Timothy R.

AU - Pope, Jason E.

AU - Hayek, Salim M.

AU - Bux, Anjum

AU - Buchser, Eric

AU - Eldabe, Sam

AU - De Andrés, Jose A.

AU - Erdek, Michael

AU - Patin, Dennis

AU - Grider, Jay S.

AU - Doleys, Daniel M.

AU - Jacobs, Marilyn S.

AU - Yaksh, Tony L.

AU - Poree, Lawrence

AU - Wallace, Mark S.

AU - Prager, Joshua

AU - Rauck, Richard

AU - DeLeon, Oscar

AU - Diwan, Sudhir

AU - Falowski, Steven M.

AU - Gazelka, Helena M.

AU - Kim, Philip

AU - Leong, Michael

AU - Levy, Robert M.

AU - McDowell, Gladstone

AU - McRoberts, Porter

AU - Naidu, Ramana

AU - Narouze, Samir

AU - Perruchoud, Christophe

AU - Rosen, Steven M.

AU - Rosenberg, William S.

AU - Saulino, Michael

AU - Staats, Peter

AU - Stearns, Lisa J.

AU - Willis, Dean

AU - Krames, Elliot

AU - Huntoon, Marc

AU - Mekhail, Nagy

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Introduction: Pain treatment is best performed when a patient-centric, safety-based philosophy is used to determine an algorithmic process to guide care. Since 2007, the International Neuromodulation Society has organized a group of experts to evaluate evidence and create a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) to guide practice. Methods: The current PACC update was designed to address the deficiencies and innovations emerging since the previous PACC publication of 2012. An extensive literature search identified publications between January 15, 2007 and November 22, 2015 and authors contributed additional relevant sources. After reviewing the literature, the panel convened to determine evidence levels and degrees of recommendations for intrathecal therapy. This meeting served as the basis for consensus development, which was ranked as strong, moderate or weak. Algorithms were developed for intrathecal medication choices to treat nociceptive and neuropathic pain for patients with cancer, terminal illness, and noncancer pain, with either localized or diffuse pain. Results: The PACC has developed an algorithmic process for several aspects of intrathecal drug delivery to promote safe and efficacious evidence-based care. Consensus opinion, based on expertise, was used to fill gaps in evidence. Thirty-one consensus points emerged from the panel considerations. Conclusion: New algorithms and guidance have been established to improve care with the use of intrathecal drug delivery.

AB - Introduction: Pain treatment is best performed when a patient-centric, safety-based philosophy is used to determine an algorithmic process to guide care. Since 2007, the International Neuromodulation Society has organized a group of experts to evaluate evidence and create a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) to guide practice. Methods: The current PACC update was designed to address the deficiencies and innovations emerging since the previous PACC publication of 2012. An extensive literature search identified publications between January 15, 2007 and November 22, 2015 and authors contributed additional relevant sources. After reviewing the literature, the panel convened to determine evidence levels and degrees of recommendations for intrathecal therapy. This meeting served as the basis for consensus development, which was ranked as strong, moderate or weak. Algorithms were developed for intrathecal medication choices to treat nociceptive and neuropathic pain for patients with cancer, terminal illness, and noncancer pain, with either localized or diffuse pain. Results: The PACC has developed an algorithmic process for several aspects of intrathecal drug delivery to promote safe and efficacious evidence-based care. Consensus opinion, based on expertise, was used to fill gaps in evidence. Thirty-one consensus points emerged from the panel considerations. Conclusion: New algorithms and guidance have been established to improve care with the use of intrathecal drug delivery.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - consensus

KW - fixed rate pump

KW - intrathecal drug delivery

KW - neuropathic pain

KW - nonmalignant pain

KW - opioid

KW - programmable pump

KW - psychological evaluation

KW - safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007545446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007545446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ner.12538

DO - 10.1111/ner.12538

M3 - Review article

VL - 20

SP - 96

EP - 132

JO - Neuromodulation

JF - Neuromodulation

SN - 1094-7159

IS - 2

ER -