The political evolution of mental health parity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article traces the evolution of the mental health parity debate in American politics, with a focus on how interest groups and politicians have attempted to influence perceptions about treatment effectiveness and the cost of benefit expansion. When parity laws are in place, they require health plans operating in the private health insurance market to provide an equivalent level of coverage for mental health and general medical care. Business and insurance industry groups oppose parity due to cost concerns. The mental health community has framed parity as an antidiscrimination measure that would achieve greater insurance equity across disease groups. The role of personal experience with mental illness among lawmakers and others in framing the parity debate is also considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-194
Number of pages10
JournalHarvard Review of Psychiatry
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parity
Mental Health
Insurance
Public Opinion
Politics
Health Insurance
Health Care Costs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Industry
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Mental health insurance
  • Parity
  • Politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The political evolution of mental health parity. / Barry, Colleen L.

In: Harvard Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.08.2006, p. 185-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f72f252e28ff47e8b976272134f56b58,
title = "The political evolution of mental health parity",
abstract = "This article traces the evolution of the mental health parity debate in American politics, with a focus on how interest groups and politicians have attempted to influence perceptions about treatment effectiveness and the cost of benefit expansion. When parity laws are in place, they require health plans operating in the private health insurance market to provide an equivalent level of coverage for mental health and general medical care. Business and insurance industry groups oppose parity due to cost concerns. The mental health community has framed parity as an antidiscrimination measure that would achieve greater insurance equity across disease groups. The role of personal experience with mental illness among lawmakers and others in framing the parity debate is also considered.",
keywords = "Mental health insurance, Parity, Politics",
author = "Barry, {Colleen L}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10673220600883168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "185--194",
journal = "Harvard Review of Psychiatry",
issn = "1067-3229",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political evolution of mental health parity

AU - Barry, Colleen L

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - This article traces the evolution of the mental health parity debate in American politics, with a focus on how interest groups and politicians have attempted to influence perceptions about treatment effectiveness and the cost of benefit expansion. When parity laws are in place, they require health plans operating in the private health insurance market to provide an equivalent level of coverage for mental health and general medical care. Business and insurance industry groups oppose parity due to cost concerns. The mental health community has framed parity as an antidiscrimination measure that would achieve greater insurance equity across disease groups. The role of personal experience with mental illness among lawmakers and others in framing the parity debate is also considered.

AB - This article traces the evolution of the mental health parity debate in American politics, with a focus on how interest groups and politicians have attempted to influence perceptions about treatment effectiveness and the cost of benefit expansion. When parity laws are in place, they require health plans operating in the private health insurance market to provide an equivalent level of coverage for mental health and general medical care. Business and insurance industry groups oppose parity due to cost concerns. The mental health community has framed parity as an antidiscrimination measure that would achieve greater insurance equity across disease groups. The role of personal experience with mental illness among lawmakers and others in framing the parity debate is also considered.

KW - Mental health insurance

KW - Parity

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747497835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747497835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10673220600883168

DO - 10.1080/10673220600883168

M3 - Article

C2 - 16912004

AN - SCOPUS:33747497835

VL - 14

SP - 185

EP - 194

JO - Harvard Review of Psychiatry

JF - Harvard Review of Psychiatry

SN - 1067-3229

IS - 4

ER -