The pitfalls of hair analysis for toxicants in clinical practice: Three case reports

Melissa Frisch, Brian S. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hair analysis is used to assess exposure to heavy metals in patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms and is a commonly used procedure in patients referred to our clinic. We are frequently called on to evaluate patients who have health-related concerns as a result of hair analysis. Three patients first presented to outside physicians with nonspecific, multisystemic symptoms. A panel of analytes was measured in hair, and one or more values were interpreted as elevated. As a result of the hair analysis and other unconventional diagnostic tests, the patients presented to us believing they suffered from metal toxicity. In this paper we review the clinical efficacy of this procedure within the context of a patient population with somatic disorders and no clear risk factors for metal intoxication. We also review limitations of hair analysis in this setting; these limitations include patient factors such as low pretest probability of disease and test factors such as the lack of validation of analytic techniques, the inability to discern between exogenous contaminants and endogenous toxicants in hair, the variability of analytic procedures, low interlaboratory reliability, and the increased likelihood of false positive test results in the measurement of panels of analytes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-436
Number of pages4
JournalEnvironmental health perspectives
Volume110
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Keywords

  • Hair analysis
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Toxicant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The pitfalls of hair analysis for toxicants in clinical practice: Three case reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this