The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries

Geoffrey W. Cundiff, Cindy L. Amundsen, Alfred E. Bent, Kimberly W. Coates, Joseph I. Schaffer, Kris Strohbehn, Victoria L Handa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to compare symptom relief and change in life impact for women using the ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries. Study Design: Subjects were randomized to use each pessary for 3 months. Outcome data included a visual analog satisfaction score, and quality of life questionnaires. Analysis included student's t-test, Wilcoxan Signed-rank test and logistical regression. Results: Subjects were primarily white, parous, postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61. The median POPQ stage was III. We enrolled 134 subjects and collected 3-month data on 94 ring and 99 Gellhorn subjects. There were statistically and clinically significant improvements in the majority of the PFDI and many PFIQ scales with both pessaries, but no clinically significant differences between the two pessaries. Conclusions: The ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries are effective and equivalent in relieving symptoms of protrusion and voiding dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume196
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Pessaries
Cross-Over Studies
Quality of Life
Students

Keywords

  • Gellhorn pessary
  • pelvic organ prolapse
  • Ring pessary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The PESSRI study : symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. / Cundiff, Geoffrey W.; Amundsen, Cindy L.; Bent, Alfred E.; Coates, Kimberly W.; Schaffer, Joseph I.; Strohbehn, Kris; Handa, Victoria L.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 196, No. 4, 04.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Amundsen, Cindy L. ; Bent, Alfred E. ; Coates, Kimberly W. ; Schaffer, Joseph I. ; Strohbehn, Kris ; Handa, Victoria L. / The PESSRI study : symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007 ; Vol. 196, No. 4.
@article{1a3ac5d762c0491a9c79fdd507a76f61,
title = "The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to compare symptom relief and change in life impact for women using the ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries. Study Design: Subjects were randomized to use each pessary for 3 months. Outcome data included a visual analog satisfaction score, and quality of life questionnaires. Analysis included student's t-test, Wilcoxan Signed-rank test and logistical regression. Results: Subjects were primarily white, parous, postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61. The median POPQ stage was III. We enrolled 134 subjects and collected 3-month data on 94 ring and 99 Gellhorn subjects. There were statistically and clinically significant improvements in the majority of the PFDI and many PFIQ scales with both pessaries, but no clinically significant differences between the two pessaries. Conclusions: The ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries are effective and equivalent in relieving symptoms of protrusion and voiding dysfunction.",
keywords = "Gellhorn pessary, pelvic organ prolapse, Ring pessary",
author = "Cundiff, {Geoffrey W.} and Amundsen, {Cindy L.} and Bent, {Alfred E.} and Coates, {Kimberly W.} and Schaffer, {Joseph I.} and Kris Strohbehn and Handa, {Victoria L}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The PESSRI study

T2 - symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries

AU - Cundiff, Geoffrey W.

AU - Amundsen, Cindy L.

AU - Bent, Alfred E.

AU - Coates, Kimberly W.

AU - Schaffer, Joseph I.

AU - Strohbehn, Kris

AU - Handa, Victoria L

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Objective: The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to compare symptom relief and change in life impact for women using the ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries. Study Design: Subjects were randomized to use each pessary for 3 months. Outcome data included a visual analog satisfaction score, and quality of life questionnaires. Analysis included student's t-test, Wilcoxan Signed-rank test and logistical regression. Results: Subjects were primarily white, parous, postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61. The median POPQ stage was III. We enrolled 134 subjects and collected 3-month data on 94 ring and 99 Gellhorn subjects. There were statistically and clinically significant improvements in the majority of the PFDI and many PFIQ scales with both pessaries, but no clinically significant differences between the two pessaries. Conclusions: The ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries are effective and equivalent in relieving symptoms of protrusion and voiding dysfunction.

AB - Objective: The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to compare symptom relief and change in life impact for women using the ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries. Study Design: Subjects were randomized to use each pessary for 3 months. Outcome data included a visual analog satisfaction score, and quality of life questionnaires. Analysis included student's t-test, Wilcoxan Signed-rank test and logistical regression. Results: Subjects were primarily white, parous, postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61. The median POPQ stage was III. We enrolled 134 subjects and collected 3-month data on 94 ring and 99 Gellhorn subjects. There were statistically and clinically significant improvements in the majority of the PFDI and many PFIQ scales with both pessaries, but no clinically significant differences between the two pessaries. Conclusions: The ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries are effective and equivalent in relieving symptoms of protrusion and voiding dysfunction.

KW - Gellhorn pessary

KW - pelvic organ prolapse

KW - Ring pessary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947703071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947703071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 17403437

AN - SCOPUS:33947703071

VL - 196

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 4

ER -