The organization of arithmetic facts in memory: Evidence from a brain-damaged patient

Dale Dagenbach, Michael McCloskey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We report a single case study of a brain-damaged patient with impaired arithmetic performance. Three principal findings are presented: First, in a task involving production of answers to simple arithmetic problems, the patient's performance was far better for subtraction than for addition or multiplication. Second, in all arithmetic operations performance was generally much better for problems potentially solvable by rule (e.g., 5 + 0) than for problems requiring retrieval of specific facts (e.g., 5 + 3). Third, the dissociation between subtraction and the other arithmetic operations obtained in the production task was not observed in a verification task. The implications of these findings for claims concerning the organization of stored arithmetic facts are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-366
Number of pages22
JournalBrain and Cognition
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Brain
Brain-damaged
Subtraction
Dissociation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

The organization of arithmetic facts in memory : Evidence from a brain-damaged patient. / Dagenbach, Dale; McCloskey, Michael.

In: Brain and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1992, p. 345-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dagenbach, Dale ; McCloskey, Michael. / The organization of arithmetic facts in memory : Evidence from a brain-damaged patient. In: Brain and Cognition. 1992 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 345-366.
@article{d0e2eef2eda947f9afb2c8d8aea7eaba,
title = "The organization of arithmetic facts in memory: Evidence from a brain-damaged patient",
abstract = "We report a single case study of a brain-damaged patient with impaired arithmetic performance. Three principal findings are presented: First, in a task involving production of answers to simple arithmetic problems, the patient's performance was far better for subtraction than for addition or multiplication. Second, in all arithmetic operations performance was generally much better for problems potentially solvable by rule (e.g., 5 + 0) than for problems requiring retrieval of specific facts (e.g., 5 + 3). Third, the dissociation between subtraction and the other arithmetic operations obtained in the production task was not observed in a verification task. The implications of these findings for claims concerning the organization of stored arithmetic facts are discussed.",
author = "Dale Dagenbach and Michael McCloskey",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0278-2626(92)90026-I",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "345--366",
journal = "Brain and Cognition",
issn = "0278-2626",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The organization of arithmetic facts in memory

T2 - Evidence from a brain-damaged patient

AU - Dagenbach, Dale

AU - McCloskey, Michael

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - We report a single case study of a brain-damaged patient with impaired arithmetic performance. Three principal findings are presented: First, in a task involving production of answers to simple arithmetic problems, the patient's performance was far better for subtraction than for addition or multiplication. Second, in all arithmetic operations performance was generally much better for problems potentially solvable by rule (e.g., 5 + 0) than for problems requiring retrieval of specific facts (e.g., 5 + 3). Third, the dissociation between subtraction and the other arithmetic operations obtained in the production task was not observed in a verification task. The implications of these findings for claims concerning the organization of stored arithmetic facts are discussed.

AB - We report a single case study of a brain-damaged patient with impaired arithmetic performance. Three principal findings are presented: First, in a task involving production of answers to simple arithmetic problems, the patient's performance was far better for subtraction than for addition or multiplication. Second, in all arithmetic operations performance was generally much better for problems potentially solvable by rule (e.g., 5 + 0) than for problems requiring retrieval of specific facts (e.g., 5 + 3). Third, the dissociation between subtraction and the other arithmetic operations obtained in the production task was not observed in a verification task. The implications of these findings for claims concerning the organization of stored arithmetic facts are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026948962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026948962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90026-I

DO - 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90026-I

M3 - Article

C2 - 1449763

AN - SCOPUS:0026948962

VL - 20

SP - 345

EP - 366

JO - Brain and Cognition

JF - Brain and Cognition

SN - 0278-2626

IS - 2

ER -