The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

David R. Nerenz; David Cella; Lacy Fabian; Eugene Nuccio; John Bott; J. Matt Austin; Sam Simon; Jack Needleman; Karen Johnson

doi:10.1177/1062860620914026

The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

David R. Nerenz, David Cella, Lacy Fabian, Eugene Nuccio, John Bott, J. Matt Austin, Sam Simon, Jack Needleman, Karen Johnson

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel”) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel’s role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	458-464
Number of pages	7
Journal	American Journal of Medical Quality
Volume	35
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860620914026
State	Published - Dec 2020

Keywords

National Quality Forum
measure reliability
measure validity
quality measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1177/1062860620914026

Cite this

@article{1446bcde07c84ddf823e82391c83743f,

title = "The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures",

abstract = "In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel”) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel{\textquoteright}s role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.",

keywords = "National Quality Forum, measure reliability, measure validity, quality measures",

author = "Nerenz, {David R.} and David Cella and Lacy Fabian and Eugene Nuccio and John Bott and Austin, {J. Matt} and Sam Simon and Jack Needleman and Karen Johnson",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1177/1062860620914026",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "35",

pages = "458--464",

journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",

issn = "1062-8606",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The NQF Scientific Methods Panel

T2 - Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

AU - Nerenz, David R.

AU - Cella, David

AU - Fabian, Lacy

AU - Nuccio, Eugene

AU - Bott, John

AU - Austin, J. Matt

AU - Simon, Sam

AU - Needleman, Jack

AU - Johnson, Karen

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel”) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel’s role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.

AB - In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel”) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel’s role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.

KW - National Quality Forum

KW - measure reliability

KW - measure validity

KW - quality measures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082943081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082943081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860620914026

DO - 10.1177/1062860620914026

M3 - Article

C2 - 32223651

AN - SCOPUS:85082943081

SN - 1062-8606

VL - 35

SP - 458

EP - 464

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

IS - 6

ER -

The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this