The neuropsychology of delirium: Advancing the science of delirium assessment

Zoë Tieges, Jonathan J. Evans, Karin Jane Neufeld, Alasdair M.J. Maclullich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The diagnosis of delirium depends on eliciting its features through mental status examination and informant history. However, there is marked heterogeneity in how these features are assessed, from binary subjective clinical judgement to more comprehensive methods supported by cognitive testing. The aim of this article is to review the neuropsychological research in delirium and suggest future directions in research and clinical practice. Methods: We reviewed the neuropsychological literature on formal assessment and quantification of the different domains in delirium, focusing on the core feature of inattention. Results: Few studies have characterised and quantified the features of delirium using objective methods commonly employed in neuropsychological research. The existing evidence confirms that patients with delirium usually show impairments on objective tests of attention compared with cognitively intact controls and, in most cases, compared with patients with dementia. Further, abnormal level of arousal appears to be a specific indicator of delirium. The neuropsychological evidence base for impairments in other cognitive domains in delirium, including visual perception, language and thought processes, is small. Conclusions: Delirium diagnosis requires accurate testing for its features, but there is little neuropsychological research examining the nature of these features, or evaluating the reliability, validity and discriminatory power of existing assessment processes. More research using the neuropsychological approach has enormous potential to improve and standardise delirium assessment methods of the individual features of delirium, such as inattention, and in developing more robust reference standards to enable greater comparability between studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Neuropsychology
Delirium
Research
Visual Perception
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Arousal
Reproducibility of Results
Dementia
Language
History

Keywords

  • Arousal
  • Attention
  • Cognitive tests
  • Delirium
  • Neuropsychological assessment
  • Objective measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The neuropsychology of delirium : Advancing the science of delirium assessment. / Tieges, Zoë; Evans, Jonathan J.; Neufeld, Karin Jane; Maclullich, Alasdair M.J.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{efc4d5041fd3419fa29ff1c846e21d5d,
title = "The neuropsychology of delirium: Advancing the science of delirium assessment",
abstract = "Objective: The diagnosis of delirium depends on eliciting its features through mental status examination and informant history. However, there is marked heterogeneity in how these features are assessed, from binary subjective clinical judgement to more comprehensive methods supported by cognitive testing. The aim of this article is to review the neuropsychological research in delirium and suggest future directions in research and clinical practice. Methods: We reviewed the neuropsychological literature on formal assessment and quantification of the different domains in delirium, focusing on the core feature of inattention. Results: Few studies have characterised and quantified the features of delirium using objective methods commonly employed in neuropsychological research. The existing evidence confirms that patients with delirium usually show impairments on objective tests of attention compared with cognitively intact controls and, in most cases, compared with patients with dementia. Further, abnormal level of arousal appears to be a specific indicator of delirium. The neuropsychological evidence base for impairments in other cognitive domains in delirium, including visual perception, language and thought processes, is small. Conclusions: Delirium diagnosis requires accurate testing for its features, but there is little neuropsychological research examining the nature of these features, or evaluating the reliability, validity and discriminatory power of existing assessment processes. More research using the neuropsychological approach has enormous potential to improve and standardise delirium assessment methods of the individual features of delirium, such as inattention, and in developing more robust reference standards to enable greater comparability between studies.",
keywords = "Arousal, Attention, Cognitive tests, Delirium, Neuropsychological assessment, Objective measurement",
author = "Zo{\"e} Tieges and Evans, {Jonathan J.} and Neufeld, {Karin Jane} and Maclullich, {Alasdair M.J.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/gps.4711",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The neuropsychology of delirium

T2 - Advancing the science of delirium assessment

AU - Tieges, Zoë

AU - Evans, Jonathan J.

AU - Neufeld, Karin Jane

AU - Maclullich, Alasdair M.J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: The diagnosis of delirium depends on eliciting its features through mental status examination and informant history. However, there is marked heterogeneity in how these features are assessed, from binary subjective clinical judgement to more comprehensive methods supported by cognitive testing. The aim of this article is to review the neuropsychological research in delirium and suggest future directions in research and clinical practice. Methods: We reviewed the neuropsychological literature on formal assessment and quantification of the different domains in delirium, focusing on the core feature of inattention. Results: Few studies have characterised and quantified the features of delirium using objective methods commonly employed in neuropsychological research. The existing evidence confirms that patients with delirium usually show impairments on objective tests of attention compared with cognitively intact controls and, in most cases, compared with patients with dementia. Further, abnormal level of arousal appears to be a specific indicator of delirium. The neuropsychological evidence base for impairments in other cognitive domains in delirium, including visual perception, language and thought processes, is small. Conclusions: Delirium diagnosis requires accurate testing for its features, but there is little neuropsychological research examining the nature of these features, or evaluating the reliability, validity and discriminatory power of existing assessment processes. More research using the neuropsychological approach has enormous potential to improve and standardise delirium assessment methods of the individual features of delirium, such as inattention, and in developing more robust reference standards to enable greater comparability between studies.

AB - Objective: The diagnosis of delirium depends on eliciting its features through mental status examination and informant history. However, there is marked heterogeneity in how these features are assessed, from binary subjective clinical judgement to more comprehensive methods supported by cognitive testing. The aim of this article is to review the neuropsychological research in delirium and suggest future directions in research and clinical practice. Methods: We reviewed the neuropsychological literature on formal assessment and quantification of the different domains in delirium, focusing on the core feature of inattention. Results: Few studies have characterised and quantified the features of delirium using objective methods commonly employed in neuropsychological research. The existing evidence confirms that patients with delirium usually show impairments on objective tests of attention compared with cognitively intact controls and, in most cases, compared with patients with dementia. Further, abnormal level of arousal appears to be a specific indicator of delirium. The neuropsychological evidence base for impairments in other cognitive domains in delirium, including visual perception, language and thought processes, is small. Conclusions: Delirium diagnosis requires accurate testing for its features, but there is little neuropsychological research examining the nature of these features, or evaluating the reliability, validity and discriminatory power of existing assessment processes. More research using the neuropsychological approach has enormous potential to improve and standardise delirium assessment methods of the individual features of delirium, such as inattention, and in developing more robust reference standards to enable greater comparability between studies.

KW - Arousal

KW - Attention

KW - Cognitive tests

KW - Delirium

KW - Neuropsychological assessment

KW - Objective measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017568733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017568733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.4711

DO - 10.1002/gps.4711

M3 - Article

C2 - 28393426

AN - SCOPUS:85017568733

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

ER -