The NEO-PI-3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory

Robert R. McCrae, Paul Costa, Thomas A. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Use of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) in adolescent samples has shown that a few respondents have difficulty with a subset of items. We identified 30 items that were not understood by at least 2% of adolescent respondents and 18 additional items with low item-total correlations, and we wrote 2 trial replacement items for each. We used self-report and observer rating data from 500 respondents aged 14 to 20 to select replacement items. The modified instrument retained the intended factor structure and showed slightly better internal consistency, cross-observer agreement, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level = 5.3). The NEO-PI-3 appears to be useful in high school and college samples and may have wider applicability to adults as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-270
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Personality Inventory
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The NEO-PI-3 : A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. / McCrae, Robert R.; Costa, Paul; Martin, Thomas A.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 84, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 261-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCrae, Robert R. ; Costa, Paul ; Martin, Thomas A. / The NEO-PI-3 : A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In: Journal of Personality Assessment. 2005 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 261-270.
@article{86c55e42121e491ab0c858e4f0ecdcbf,
title = "The NEO-PI-3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory",
abstract = "Use of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) in adolescent samples has shown that a few respondents have difficulty with a subset of items. We identified 30 items that were not understood by at least 2{\%} of adolescent respondents and 18 additional items with low item-total correlations, and we wrote 2 trial replacement items for each. We used self-report and observer rating data from 500 respondents aged 14 to 20 to select replacement items. The modified instrument retained the intended factor structure and showed slightly better internal consistency, cross-observer agreement, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level = 5.3). The NEO-PI-3 appears to be useful in high school and college samples and may have wider applicability to adults as well.",
author = "McCrae, {Robert R.} and Paul Costa and Martin, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "261--270",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The NEO-PI-3

T2 - A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory

AU - McCrae, Robert R.

AU - Costa, Paul

AU - Martin, Thomas A.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Use of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) in adolescent samples has shown that a few respondents have difficulty with a subset of items. We identified 30 items that were not understood by at least 2% of adolescent respondents and 18 additional items with low item-total correlations, and we wrote 2 trial replacement items for each. We used self-report and observer rating data from 500 respondents aged 14 to 20 to select replacement items. The modified instrument retained the intended factor structure and showed slightly better internal consistency, cross-observer agreement, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level = 5.3). The NEO-PI-3 appears to be useful in high school and college samples and may have wider applicability to adults as well.

AB - Use of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) in adolescent samples has shown that a few respondents have difficulty with a subset of items. We identified 30 items that were not understood by at least 2% of adolescent respondents and 18 additional items with low item-total correlations, and we wrote 2 trial replacement items for each. We used self-report and observer rating data from 500 respondents aged 14 to 20 to select replacement items. The modified instrument retained the intended factor structure and showed slightly better internal consistency, cross-observer agreement, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level = 5.3). The NEO-PI-3 appears to be useful in high school and college samples and may have wider applicability to adults as well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19444365790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19444365790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05

DO - 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05

M3 - Article

C2 - 15907162

AN - SCOPUS:19444365790

VL - 84

SP - 261

EP - 270

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 3

ER -