The National Practitioner Database Malpractice Study of Severity of Alleged Malpractice Injuries Trends 2008-2018

Victoria Goode, Christian Douglas, Elizabeth Merwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This research examined trends and severity of alleged injury in malpractice over a 10-year period. An understanding of the severity of patient outcomes is important to gauge improvements in care delivery. Analysis of the National Practitioner Database (NPDB) investigated malpractice payments from 2008 to 2018 by physicians, advanced nurse practitioners, and registered nurses and assessed the relationship of years of practice on the severity of alleged malpractice injury. Malpractice payments over the study period, primarily represented payments for significant permanent or major permanent injuries (25.97%) or death (32.74%). Claims overall have shown a decline, including claims by the severity of malpractice injury, for most outcomes. The clinicians represented in the NPDB with >15 years of practice have greater odds for severity of malpractice injuries classified as minor permanent injury and significant permanent injury than those clinicians represented in the NPDB with fewer years of practice. Top allegation categorizations for malpractice payment were diagnostics, treatment, and surgery related for 4 of the severities of alleged injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-404
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2022

Keywords

  • allegation groups
  • malpractice
  • national practitioner databank
  • patient safety
  • severity of outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The National Practitioner Database Malpractice Study of Severity of Alleged Malpractice Injuries Trends 2008-2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this