The nancy cruzan case

Loretta M. Kopelman, Robert L. Schwartz, Pam Lambert, Larry Gostin, Charles L. Sprung, George J. Annas

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

To the Editor: I agree with the articles by Annas and others (Sept. 6 issue)1,2 on the problems in the Cruzan opinion, but I would like to suggest another way in which this decision is out of touch with medical reality. The Supreme Court in Cruzan found that the standards of best interest and substituted judgment for medical decision making are distinct and that the states may set the level of evidence needed to meet the standard of substituted judgment. In contrast, physicians do not treat these standards as entirely distinct, especially when risks are high. The more physicians believe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-562
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume324
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 21 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The nancy cruzan case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kopelman, L. M., Schwartz, R. L., Lambert, P., Gostin, L., Sprung, C. L., & Annas, G. J. (1991). The nancy cruzan case. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(8), 561-562. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102213240812