The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure: What affects the potential of the bladder?

John Phillip Gearhart, Jacob Ben-Chaim, Christopher Sciortino, Paul David Sponseller, Robert D. Jeffs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. To define the possible cause of failure and the eventual potential of the bladder in 23 exstrophy patients, who underwent more than two failed prior attempts at closure. Methods. Twenty-three patients were selected from the exstrophy data base who had two or more prior closures. Eighteen patients had undergone 2 previous closures and 5 patients 3 previous closures for either complete dehiscence or significant prolapse. At the time of initial closure, 19 patients did not have an osteotomy. At secondary closure, 10 underwent osteotomy while at third closure 5 had an osteotomy. At the time of reclosure at our institution all underwent an osteotomy. Results. Reoperative repair at our institution was successful in all patients. Six patients achieved a bladder size suitable for bladder neck reconstruction and of them 3 are dry. The bladder size was inadequate in 9 patients and 8 are being monitored for possible bladder growth. Conclusions. Tension-free closure with osteotomy and immobilization are important factors both in an initial or any subsequent closure. The chance of obtaining an adequate bladder capacity for bladder neck plasty and eventual continence, following multiple reclosures, is markedly diminished.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)240-243
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1996

Fingerprint

Bladder Exstrophy
Urinary Bladder
Osteotomy
Prolapse
Immobilization
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure : What affects the potential of the bladder? / Gearhart, John Phillip; Ben-Chaim, Jacob; Sciortino, Christopher; Sponseller, Paul David; Jeffs, Robert D.

In: Urology, Vol. 47, No. 2, 02.1996, p. 240-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gearhart, John Phillip ; Ben-Chaim, Jacob ; Sciortino, Christopher ; Sponseller, Paul David ; Jeffs, Robert D. / The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure : What affects the potential of the bladder?. In: Urology. 1996 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 240-243.
@article{32a1d1af8a60401e9a49e5ab8e3788be,
title = "The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure: What affects the potential of the bladder?",
abstract = "Objectives. To define the possible cause of failure and the eventual potential of the bladder in 23 exstrophy patients, who underwent more than two failed prior attempts at closure. Methods. Twenty-three patients were selected from the exstrophy data base who had two or more prior closures. Eighteen patients had undergone 2 previous closures and 5 patients 3 previous closures for either complete dehiscence or significant prolapse. At the time of initial closure, 19 patients did not have an osteotomy. At secondary closure, 10 underwent osteotomy while at third closure 5 had an osteotomy. At the time of reclosure at our institution all underwent an osteotomy. Results. Reoperative repair at our institution was successful in all patients. Six patients achieved a bladder size suitable for bladder neck reconstruction and of them 3 are dry. The bladder size was inadequate in 9 patients and 8 are being monitored for possible bladder growth. Conclusions. Tension-free closure with osteotomy and immobilization are important factors both in an initial or any subsequent closure. The chance of obtaining an adequate bladder capacity for bladder neck plasty and eventual continence, following multiple reclosures, is markedly diminished.",
author = "Gearhart, {John Phillip} and Jacob Ben-Chaim and Christopher Sciortino and Sponseller, {Paul David} and Jeffs, {Robert D.}",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80424-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "240--243",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure

T2 - What affects the potential of the bladder?

AU - Gearhart, John Phillip

AU - Ben-Chaim, Jacob

AU - Sciortino, Christopher

AU - Sponseller, Paul David

AU - Jeffs, Robert D.

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - Objectives. To define the possible cause of failure and the eventual potential of the bladder in 23 exstrophy patients, who underwent more than two failed prior attempts at closure. Methods. Twenty-three patients were selected from the exstrophy data base who had two or more prior closures. Eighteen patients had undergone 2 previous closures and 5 patients 3 previous closures for either complete dehiscence or significant prolapse. At the time of initial closure, 19 patients did not have an osteotomy. At secondary closure, 10 underwent osteotomy while at third closure 5 had an osteotomy. At the time of reclosure at our institution all underwent an osteotomy. Results. Reoperative repair at our institution was successful in all patients. Six patients achieved a bladder size suitable for bladder neck reconstruction and of them 3 are dry. The bladder size was inadequate in 9 patients and 8 are being monitored for possible bladder growth. Conclusions. Tension-free closure with osteotomy and immobilization are important factors both in an initial or any subsequent closure. The chance of obtaining an adequate bladder capacity for bladder neck plasty and eventual continence, following multiple reclosures, is markedly diminished.

AB - Objectives. To define the possible cause of failure and the eventual potential of the bladder in 23 exstrophy patients, who underwent more than two failed prior attempts at closure. Methods. Twenty-three patients were selected from the exstrophy data base who had two or more prior closures. Eighteen patients had undergone 2 previous closures and 5 patients 3 previous closures for either complete dehiscence or significant prolapse. At the time of initial closure, 19 patients did not have an osteotomy. At secondary closure, 10 underwent osteotomy while at third closure 5 had an osteotomy. At the time of reclosure at our institution all underwent an osteotomy. Results. Reoperative repair at our institution was successful in all patients. Six patients achieved a bladder size suitable for bladder neck reconstruction and of them 3 are dry. The bladder size was inadequate in 9 patients and 8 are being monitored for possible bladder growth. Conclusions. Tension-free closure with osteotomy and immobilization are important factors both in an initial or any subsequent closure. The chance of obtaining an adequate bladder capacity for bladder neck plasty and eventual continence, following multiple reclosures, is markedly diminished.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029959941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029959941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80424-5

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80424-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 8607242

AN - SCOPUS:0029959941

VL - 47

SP - 240

EP - 243

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 2

ER -