The medical market place, the patient, and the absence of medical ethics in early modern Europe and North America

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

INTRODUCTION From the Renaissance well into the nineteenth century, no ethics particular to medicine governed the patient–practitioner relationship in Europe and North America (see also Chapters 1 and 28). Although elite university-trained practitioners wrote treatises on topics that we now consider under the rubric of medical ethics, the day-to-day relationships between healers and the sick were shaped by two sets of more general social norms. First, the structure of early modern health care provision has been likened to a medical marketplace. In such a marketplace, medicine was a commodity like any other, and so medical interactions were largely structured by the rules of commercial interchange. Second, as in other social relations of the period, both patients and practitioners appreciated the mutual obligations of patronage and deference between people of different social groups. At times, the patient was the patron, and the practitioner a client, whereas at others these roles were reversed. From the seventeenth century, patients were sometimes understood as a group deserving of special protection due to their temporary or permanent disability. THE MEDICAL MARKETPLACE Over the past two decades, historians have become interested in the rank-and-file of medical practitioners and in the experiences of patients rather than just the elite of medicine. As a result of this broader canvas, they have come to describe health care provision in early modern Europe and North America as a medical marketplace (see also Chapter 27). Three key features characterize this model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages531-539
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9781139195812, 9780521888790
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Early Modern Europe
Medical Ethics
Medicine
Healthcare
Elites
Medical Marketplace
Patronage
Commodities
Social Relations
Patron
Social Groups
Medical Practitioners
Deference
Medical Interaction
Treatise
Obligation
Canvas
File
Healers
Social Norms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

The medical market place, the patient, and the absence of medical ethics in early modern Europe and North America. / Fissell, Mary E.

The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 531-539.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Fissell, Mary E. / The medical market place, the patient, and the absence of medical ethics in early modern Europe and North America. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 531-539
@inbook{877f876dffc14a82b1ba45959a254483,
title = "The medical market place, the patient, and the absence of medical ethics in early modern Europe and North America",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION From the Renaissance well into the nineteenth century, no ethics particular to medicine governed the patient–practitioner relationship in Europe and North America (see also Chapters 1 and 28). Although elite university-trained practitioners wrote treatises on topics that we now consider under the rubric of medical ethics, the day-to-day relationships between healers and the sick were shaped by two sets of more general social norms. First, the structure of early modern health care provision has been likened to a medical marketplace. In such a marketplace, medicine was a commodity like any other, and so medical interactions were largely structured by the rules of commercial interchange. Second, as in other social relations of the period, both patients and practitioners appreciated the mutual obligations of patronage and deference between people of different social groups. At times, the patient was the patron, and the practitioner a client, whereas at others these roles were reversed. From the seventeenth century, patients were sometimes understood as a group deserving of special protection due to their temporary or permanent disability. THE MEDICAL MARKETPLACE Over the past two decades, historians have become interested in the rank-and-file of medical practitioners and in the experiences of patients rather than just the elite of medicine. As a result of this broader canvas, they have come to describe health care provision in early modern Europe and North America as a medical marketplace (see also Chapter 27). Three key features characterize this model.",
author = "Fissell, {Mary E}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.048",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781139195812",
pages = "531--539",
booktitle = "The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The medical market place, the patient, and the absence of medical ethics in early modern Europe and North America

AU - Fissell, Mary E

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION From the Renaissance well into the nineteenth century, no ethics particular to medicine governed the patient–practitioner relationship in Europe and North America (see also Chapters 1 and 28). Although elite university-trained practitioners wrote treatises on topics that we now consider under the rubric of medical ethics, the day-to-day relationships between healers and the sick were shaped by two sets of more general social norms. First, the structure of early modern health care provision has been likened to a medical marketplace. In such a marketplace, medicine was a commodity like any other, and so medical interactions were largely structured by the rules of commercial interchange. Second, as in other social relations of the period, both patients and practitioners appreciated the mutual obligations of patronage and deference between people of different social groups. At times, the patient was the patron, and the practitioner a client, whereas at others these roles were reversed. From the seventeenth century, patients were sometimes understood as a group deserving of special protection due to their temporary or permanent disability. THE MEDICAL MARKETPLACE Over the past two decades, historians have become interested in the rank-and-file of medical practitioners and in the experiences of patients rather than just the elite of medicine. As a result of this broader canvas, they have come to describe health care provision in early modern Europe and North America as a medical marketplace (see also Chapter 27). Three key features characterize this model.

AB - INTRODUCTION From the Renaissance well into the nineteenth century, no ethics particular to medicine governed the patient–practitioner relationship in Europe and North America (see also Chapters 1 and 28). Although elite university-trained practitioners wrote treatises on topics that we now consider under the rubric of medical ethics, the day-to-day relationships between healers and the sick were shaped by two sets of more general social norms. First, the structure of early modern health care provision has been likened to a medical marketplace. In such a marketplace, medicine was a commodity like any other, and so medical interactions were largely structured by the rules of commercial interchange. Second, as in other social relations of the period, both patients and practitioners appreciated the mutual obligations of patronage and deference between people of different social groups. At times, the patient was the patron, and the practitioner a client, whereas at others these roles were reversed. From the seventeenth century, patients were sometimes understood as a group deserving of special protection due to their temporary or permanent disability. THE MEDICAL MARKETPLACE Over the past two decades, historians have become interested in the rank-and-file of medical practitioners and in the experiences of patients rather than just the elite of medicine. As a result of this broader canvas, they have come to describe health care provision in early modern Europe and North America as a medical marketplace (see also Chapter 27). Three key features characterize this model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924102741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924102741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.048

DO - 10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.048

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924102741

SN - 9781139195812

SN - 9780521888790

SP - 531

EP - 539

BT - The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -