The measurement of vision disability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The American Medical Association's (AMA) visual efficiency scale, a vision disability metric based on visual impairment measurements, was adopted in 1925. That scale was based on a 30-year history of theoretical models in vision economics, a misinterpretation of Snellen notation for visual acuity, and an erroneous application of Weber's psychophysical law. The AMA visual efficiency scale survived uncontested for 75 years. In 2001, the AMA adopted a new vision disability scale based on logarithmic transformations of visual acuity and visual field diameter. Like the earlier visual efficiency scale, the new scale is theoretical-it is not supported by any data that speak to the relationship between vision disability and visual impairments. Attempts to measure vision disability date to the early 1980s with the development of self-assessment visual function rating scale questionnaires. Nearly all of the questionnaires developed over the last 20 years use Likert scales, but use them incorrectly. The development of a vision disability metric based on Likert scaling parallels the historical development of other forms of measurement. A tutorial review of psychometrics-classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch analysis-shows how vision disability measurement scales can be estimated from Likert-type visual function rating scales. We conclude that preliminary data relating measures of vision disability to measures of visual acuity and visual fields support the new AMA vision disability scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)516-552
Number of pages37
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume79
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2002

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Item response theory
  • Low vision
  • Psychometrics
  • Rasch analysis
  • Vision disability
  • Visual efficiency
  • Visual function questionnaire
  • Visual impairment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry

Cite this