The longitudinal course of hand osteoarthritis in a male population

Douglas A. Kallman, Fredrick M. Wigley, William W. Scott, Marc C. Hochberg, Jordan D. Tobin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this prospective analysis of the natural history of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand, the incidence and progression of various radiographic features of OA were examined in 177 men who participated in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Subjects who were less than 60 years old were selected based on the availability of at least 4 hand radiographs taken during at least 20 years of followup, while subjects who were age 60 or older were required to have had at least 4 hand radiographs taken during only 14 years of followup. Individual joints of the hands were graded for the presence and severity of 5 features of OA: osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, lateral deformity, and cortical collapse. They were also graded according to the global Kellgren/Lawrence scale. The incidence and rate of progression of OA, as measured by all scales, increased in progressively older age groups. Cox's proportional hazards models showed that isolated doubtful osteophytes (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 1) and isolated joint space narrowing predicted the development of the radiographic features of OA. The rate of OA progression slowed as the severity increased. We conclude that, in men, the incidence of radiographic features of hand OA increases with age. Regardless of age, the earliest radiographic signs of OA are joint space narrowing and doubtful osteophytes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1323-1332
Number of pages10
JournalArthritis & Rheumatism
Volume33
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The longitudinal course of hand osteoarthritis in a male population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this