TY - JOUR
T1 - The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants
AU - Levine, Carol
AU - Faden, Ruth
AU - Grady, Christine
AU - Hammerschmidt, Dale
AU - Eckenwiler, Lisa
AU - Sugarman, Jeremy
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is a project of the Consortium to Examine Clinical Research Ethics (CECRE), which is funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. Other members of CECRE who provided valuable contributions to this manuscript were Angela Bowen, M.D., Western IRB; Ezekiel Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D., National Institutes of Health; Alan Fleischman, M.D., New York Academy of Medicine; and Kenneth Getz, Cen-terWatch. Kenneth Kipnis, Ph.D., provided useful unpublished materials and suggested important references.
Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Vulnerability is one of the least examined concepts in research ethics. Vulnerability was linked in the Belmont Report to questions of justice in the selection of subjects. Regulations and policy documents regarding the ethical conduct of research have focused on vulnerability in terms of limitations of the capacity to provide informed consent. Other interpretations of vulnerability have emphasized unequal power relationships between politically and economically disadvantaged groups and investigators or sponsors. So many groups are now considered to be vulnerable in the context of research, particularly international research, that the concept has lost force. In addition, classifying groups as vulnerable not only stereotypes them, but also may not reliably protect many individuals from harm. Certain individuals require ongoing protections of the kind already established in law and regulation, but attention must also be focused on characteristics of the research protocol and environment that present ethical challenges.
AB - Vulnerability is one of the least examined concepts in research ethics. Vulnerability was linked in the Belmont Report to questions of justice in the selection of subjects. Regulations and policy documents regarding the ethical conduct of research have focused on vulnerability in terms of limitations of the capacity to provide informed consent. Other interpretations of vulnerability have emphasized unequal power relationships between politically and economically disadvantaged groups and investigators or sponsors. So many groups are now considered to be vulnerable in the context of research, particularly international research, that the concept has lost force. In addition, classifying groups as vulnerable not only stereotypes them, but also may not reliably protect many individuals from harm. Certain individuals require ongoing protections of the kind already established in law and regulation, but attention must also be focused on characteristics of the research protocol and environment that present ethical challenges.
KW - Decisional capacity
KW - International research
KW - Research ethics
KW - Research involving children
KW - Research involving prisoners
KW - Vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28044442370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28044442370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15265160490497083
DO - 10.1080/15265160490497083
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16192138
AN - SCOPUS:28044442370
SN - 1526-5161
VL - 4
SP - 44
EP - 49
JO - American Journal of Bioethics
JF - American Journal of Bioethics
IS - 3
ER -