The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States

Fawaz Al Ammary, Alvin G. Thomas, Allan B Massie, Abimereki Muzaale, Ashton A. Shaffer, Brittany Koons, Mohamud A. Qadi, Deidra Crews, Jacqueline Garonzik, Hai Fang, Daniel Brennan, Krista L. Lentine, Dorry Segev, Macey Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the United States, kidney donation from international (noncitizen/nonresident) living kidney donors (LKDs) is permitted; however, given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems, concerns remain regarding the international LKD practice and recipient outcomes. We studied a US cohort of 102 315 LKD transplants from 2000-2016, including 2088 international LKDs, as reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. International LKDs were more tightly clustered among a small number of centers than domestic LKDs (Gini coefficient 0.76 vs 0.58, P <.001). Compared with domestic LKDs, international LKDs were more often young, male, Hispanic or Asian, and biologically related to their recipient (P <.001). Policy-compliant donor follow-up was substantially lower for international LKDs at 6, 12, and 24 months postnephrectomy (2015 cohort: 45%, 33%, 36% vs 76%, 71%, 70% for domestic LKDs, P <.001). Among international LKDs, Hispanic (aOR =  0.23 0.36 0.56 , P <.001) and biologically related (aOR =  0.39 0.59 0.89 , P <.01) donors were more compliant in donor follow-up than white and unrelated donors. Recipients of international living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) had similar graft failure (aHR =  0.78 0.89 1.02 , P =.1) but lower mortality (aHR =  0.53 0.62 0.72 , P <.001) compared with the recipients of domestic LDKT after adjusting for recipient, transplant, and donor factors. International LKDs may provide an alternative opportunity for living donation. However, efforts to improve international LKD follow-up and engagement are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Kidney
Tissue Donors
Transplants
Hispanic Americans
Unrelated Donors
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Organ Transplantation

Keywords

  • clinical research/practice
  • donors and donation: donor follow-up
  • kidney transplantation/nephrology
  • kidney transplantation: living donor
  • registry/registry analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Transplantation
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States. / Al Ammary, Fawaz; Thomas, Alvin G.; Massie, Allan B; Muzaale, Abimereki; Shaffer, Ashton A.; Koons, Brittany; Qadi, Mohamud A.; Crews, Deidra; Garonzik, Jacqueline; Fang, Hai; Brennan, Daniel; Lentine, Krista L.; Segev, Dorry; Henderson, Macey.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6ff14d506a4a4b2db72ebb09732b27e6,
title = "The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States",
abstract = "In the United States, kidney donation from international (noncitizen/nonresident) living kidney donors (LKDs) is permitted; however, given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems, concerns remain regarding the international LKD practice and recipient outcomes. We studied a US cohort of 102 315 LKD transplants from 2000-2016, including 2088 international LKDs, as reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. International LKDs were more tightly clustered among a small number of centers than domestic LKDs (Gini coefficient 0.76 vs 0.58, P <.001). Compared with domestic LKDs, international LKDs were more often young, male, Hispanic or Asian, and biologically related to their recipient (P <.001). Policy-compliant donor follow-up was substantially lower for international LKDs at 6, 12, and 24 months postnephrectomy (2015 cohort: 45{\%}, 33{\%}, 36{\%} vs 76{\%}, 71{\%}, 70{\%} for domestic LKDs, P <.001). Among international LKDs, Hispanic (aOR =  0.23 0.36 0.56 , P <.001) and biologically related (aOR =  0.39 0.59 0.89 , P <.01) donors were more compliant in donor follow-up than white and unrelated donors. Recipients of international living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) had similar graft failure (aHR =  0.78 0.89 1.02 , P =.1) but lower mortality (aHR =  0.53 0.62 0.72 , P <.001) compared with the recipients of domestic LDKT after adjusting for recipient, transplant, and donor factors. International LKDs may provide an alternative opportunity for living donation. However, efforts to improve international LKD follow-up and engagement are warranted.",
keywords = "clinical research/practice, donors and donation: donor follow-up, kidney transplantation/nephrology, kidney transplantation: living donor, registry/registry analysis",
author = "{Al Ammary}, Fawaz and Thomas, {Alvin G.} and Massie, {Allan B} and Abimereki Muzaale and Shaffer, {Ashton A.} and Brittany Koons and Qadi, {Mohamud A.} and Deidra Crews and Jacqueline Garonzik and Hai Fang and Daniel Brennan and Lentine, {Krista L.} and Dorry Segev and Macey Henderson",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajt.15256",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States

AU - Al Ammary, Fawaz

AU - Thomas, Alvin G.

AU - Massie, Allan B

AU - Muzaale, Abimereki

AU - Shaffer, Ashton A.

AU - Koons, Brittany

AU - Qadi, Mohamud A.

AU - Crews, Deidra

AU - Garonzik, Jacqueline

AU - Fang, Hai

AU - Brennan, Daniel

AU - Lentine, Krista L.

AU - Segev, Dorry

AU - Henderson, Macey

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In the United States, kidney donation from international (noncitizen/nonresident) living kidney donors (LKDs) is permitted; however, given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems, concerns remain regarding the international LKD practice and recipient outcomes. We studied a US cohort of 102 315 LKD transplants from 2000-2016, including 2088 international LKDs, as reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. International LKDs were more tightly clustered among a small number of centers than domestic LKDs (Gini coefficient 0.76 vs 0.58, P <.001). Compared with domestic LKDs, international LKDs were more often young, male, Hispanic or Asian, and biologically related to their recipient (P <.001). Policy-compliant donor follow-up was substantially lower for international LKDs at 6, 12, and 24 months postnephrectomy (2015 cohort: 45%, 33%, 36% vs 76%, 71%, 70% for domestic LKDs, P <.001). Among international LKDs, Hispanic (aOR =  0.23 0.36 0.56 , P <.001) and biologically related (aOR =  0.39 0.59 0.89 , P <.01) donors were more compliant in donor follow-up than white and unrelated donors. Recipients of international living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) had similar graft failure (aHR =  0.78 0.89 1.02 , P =.1) but lower mortality (aHR =  0.53 0.62 0.72 , P <.001) compared with the recipients of domestic LDKT after adjusting for recipient, transplant, and donor factors. International LKDs may provide an alternative opportunity for living donation. However, efforts to improve international LKD follow-up and engagement are warranted.

AB - In the United States, kidney donation from international (noncitizen/nonresident) living kidney donors (LKDs) is permitted; however, given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems, concerns remain regarding the international LKD practice and recipient outcomes. We studied a US cohort of 102 315 LKD transplants from 2000-2016, including 2088 international LKDs, as reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. International LKDs were more tightly clustered among a small number of centers than domestic LKDs (Gini coefficient 0.76 vs 0.58, P <.001). Compared with domestic LKDs, international LKDs were more often young, male, Hispanic or Asian, and biologically related to their recipient (P <.001). Policy-compliant donor follow-up was substantially lower for international LKDs at 6, 12, and 24 months postnephrectomy (2015 cohort: 45%, 33%, 36% vs 76%, 71%, 70% for domestic LKDs, P <.001). Among international LKDs, Hispanic (aOR =  0.23 0.36 0.56 , P <.001) and biologically related (aOR =  0.39 0.59 0.89 , P <.01) donors were more compliant in donor follow-up than white and unrelated donors. Recipients of international living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) had similar graft failure (aHR =  0.78 0.89 1.02 , P =.1) but lower mortality (aHR =  0.53 0.62 0.72 , P <.001) compared with the recipients of domestic LDKT after adjusting for recipient, transplant, and donor factors. International LKDs may provide an alternative opportunity for living donation. However, efforts to improve international LKD follow-up and engagement are warranted.

KW - clinical research/practice

KW - donors and donation: donor follow-up

KW - kidney transplantation/nephrology

KW - kidney transplantation: living donor

KW - registry/registry analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061272420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061272420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajt.15256

DO - 10.1111/ajt.15256

M3 - Article

C2 - 30615253

AN - SCOPUS:85061272420

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

ER -