TY - JOUR
T1 - The laboratory evaluation of opportunistic pulmonary infections
AU - Shelhamer, James H.
AU - Gill, Vee J.
AU - Quinn, Thomas C.
AU - Crawford, Stephen W.
AU - Kovacs, Joseph A.
AU - Masur, Henry
AU - Ognibene, Frederick P.
PY - 1996/3/15
Y1 - 1996/3/15
N2 - The patient population at risk for opportunistic pulmonary infections has increased during the last decade. The spectrum of organisms causing opportunistic infections has also grown. With an ever broader list of potential therapeutic options and a growing differential diagnosis, a specific diagnosis of the cause of pulmonary disease becomes more important. Recent microbiologic advances have helped to facilitate the laboratory diagnosis of some of these agents. Immunoassays are available for the detection of antigen in nasopharyngeal secretions (respiratory syncytial virus, influenza), in serum (Cryptococcus species), and in urine (Legionella or Histoplasma species). Rapid-culture techniques are available for the culture and detection of various viruses, including cytomegalovirus. Molecular probes can now assist in the rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and some fungi. In the near future, polymerase chain reaction- based techniques may assist in the detection of Pneumocystis carinii and Legionella, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, and Mycobacteria species. An expeditious evaluation of pulmonary disease requires an understanding of the differential diagnosis of likely causes of pulmonary disease in specific immunosuppressed patient populations, an understanding of the most appropriate specimens to process for these diagnoses, and an understanding of the limitations (sensitivity and specificity) of these diagnostic tests. An understanding of the most appropriate specimens and tests in a given institution should allow for early, relatively specific treatment of many potentially life-threatening infections.
AB - The patient population at risk for opportunistic pulmonary infections has increased during the last decade. The spectrum of organisms causing opportunistic infections has also grown. With an ever broader list of potential therapeutic options and a growing differential diagnosis, a specific diagnosis of the cause of pulmonary disease becomes more important. Recent microbiologic advances have helped to facilitate the laboratory diagnosis of some of these agents. Immunoassays are available for the detection of antigen in nasopharyngeal secretions (respiratory syncytial virus, influenza), in serum (Cryptococcus species), and in urine (Legionella or Histoplasma species). Rapid-culture techniques are available for the culture and detection of various viruses, including cytomegalovirus. Molecular probes can now assist in the rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and some fungi. In the near future, polymerase chain reaction- based techniques may assist in the detection of Pneumocystis carinii and Legionella, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, and Mycobacteria species. An expeditious evaluation of pulmonary disease requires an understanding of the differential diagnosis of likely causes of pulmonary disease in specific immunosuppressed patient populations, an understanding of the most appropriate specimens to process for these diagnoses, and an understanding of the limitations (sensitivity and specificity) of these diagnostic tests. An understanding of the most appropriate specimens and tests in a given institution should allow for early, relatively specific treatment of many potentially life-threatening infections.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029966535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029966535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/0003-4819-124-6-199603150-00008
DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-124-6-199603150-00008
M3 - Article
C2 - 8597323
AN - SCOPUS:0029966535
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 124
SP - 585
EP - 599
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 6
ER -