The importance of task design and behavioral control for understanding the neural basis of cognitive functions

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The success of systems neuroscience depends on the ability to forge quantitative links between neural activity and behavior. Traditionally, this process has benefited from the rigorous development and testing of hypotheses using tools derived from classical psychophysics and computational motor control. As our capacity for measuring neural activity improves, accompanied by powerful new analysis strategies, it seems prudent to remember what these traditional approaches have to offer. Here I present a perspective on the merits of principled task design and tight behavioral control, along with some words of caution about interpretation in unguided, large-scale neural recording studies. I argue that a judicious combination of new and old approaches is the best way to advance our understanding of higher brain function in health and disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-22
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology
Volume37
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychophysics
Aptitude
Neurosciences
Cognition
Health
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

@article{1757ae54c4ff4fc09d4e0b607c653ecc,
title = "The importance of task design and behavioral control for understanding the neural basis of cognitive functions",
abstract = "The success of systems neuroscience depends on the ability to forge quantitative links between neural activity and behavior. Traditionally, this process has benefited from the rigorous development and testing of hypotheses using tools derived from classical psychophysics and computational motor control. As our capacity for measuring neural activity improves, accompanied by powerful new analysis strategies, it seems prudent to remember what these traditional approaches have to offer. Here I present a perspective on the merits of principled task design and tight behavioral control, along with some words of caution about interpretation in unguided, large-scale neural recording studies. I argue that a judicious combination of new and old approaches is the best way to advance our understanding of higher brain function in health and disease.",
author = "Christopher Fetsch",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "16--22",
journal = "Current Opinion in Neurobiology",
issn = "0959-4388",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of task design and behavioral control for understanding the neural basis of cognitive functions

AU - Fetsch, Christopher

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The success of systems neuroscience depends on the ability to forge quantitative links between neural activity and behavior. Traditionally, this process has benefited from the rigorous development and testing of hypotheses using tools derived from classical psychophysics and computational motor control. As our capacity for measuring neural activity improves, accompanied by powerful new analysis strategies, it seems prudent to remember what these traditional approaches have to offer. Here I present a perspective on the merits of principled task design and tight behavioral control, along with some words of caution about interpretation in unguided, large-scale neural recording studies. I argue that a judicious combination of new and old approaches is the best way to advance our understanding of higher brain function in health and disease.

AB - The success of systems neuroscience depends on the ability to forge quantitative links between neural activity and behavior. Traditionally, this process has benefited from the rigorous development and testing of hypotheses using tools derived from classical psychophysics and computational motor control. As our capacity for measuring neural activity improves, accompanied by powerful new analysis strategies, it seems prudent to remember what these traditional approaches have to offer. Here I present a perspective on the merits of principled task design and tight behavioral control, along with some words of caution about interpretation in unguided, large-scale neural recording studies. I argue that a judicious combination of new and old approaches is the best way to advance our understanding of higher brain function in health and disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954199441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954199441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.002

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26774692

AN - SCOPUS:84954199441

VL - 37

SP - 16

EP - 22

JO - Current Opinion in Neurobiology

JF - Current Opinion in Neurobiology

SN - 0959-4388

ER -