The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai

Xuemei Ma, Ying Wang, Hua Hu, Xu Guang Tao, Yunhui Zhang, Huijing Shi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Prenatal anxiety/depression has been a major public health problem globally with higher prevalence in developing countries, which leads to negative health outcomes for both mothers and children. Maternal stress varies over the course of pregnancy and the stress occurring in early pregnancy is the most critical. However, few studies have focused on the impact of resilience to stress on mental health of pregnant women. Aims: To explore the effect of resilience to stress on prenatal anxiety/depression in pregnant women. Methods: 2813 participants were recruited from Shanghai Maternal-Child Pairs Cohort (Shanghai MCPC) in this study. The Life Event Scale for Pregnancy Women (LESPW) was used to assess stress at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy and at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy, respectively. Resilience was assessed by the revised Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy. The prenatal anxiety and depression were assessed at 32–26 weeks of pregnancy by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Center for Epidemiological Survey, Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the direct effect of stress and resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression. The indirect effects of mediation were analyzed by structural equation models, and the indirect effect of modification was examined by stratification analysis. Results: There were 11.1% and 10.3% of pregnant women in Shanghai MCPC indicating anxiety and depressive mood, respectively. The stress caused by both subjective and objective events at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy is less than that at 12–16weeks of pregnancy. We found that resilience was a protective factor for maternal mental health and meanwhile it was both an effect modifier and a mediator to the association between stress and prenatal anxiety/depression, with the mediating effect ratio of 15.1% and 23.8%, respectively. Limitations: The existence of recall bias, missing data, and restricted residential areas of the participants may limit the generalizability of the study. The measurements of resilience, prenatal anxiety, and depression were not designed specifically for pregnant women, so that they might have missed some important indications of mental issues related to pregnant women only. Conclusions: Resilience could be a direct and indirect protective factor for prenatal anxiety and depression caused by pregnancy stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-64
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume250
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pregnant Women
Anxiety
Depression
Pregnancy
Mothers
Mental Health
Structural Models
Developing Countries
Linear Models
Cohort Studies
Public Health
Regression Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Pregnant women
  • Resilience
  • Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai. / Ma, Xuemei; Wang, Ying; Hu, Hua; Tao, Xu Guang; Zhang, Yunhui; Shi, Huijing.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 250, 01.05.2019, p. 57-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ma, Xuemei ; Wang, Ying ; Hu, Hua ; Tao, Xu Guang ; Zhang, Yunhui ; Shi, Huijing. / The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019 ; Vol. 250. pp. 57-64.
@article{29227cb7d72f4adb9af6011240cf359b,
title = "The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai",
abstract = "Background: Prenatal anxiety/depression has been a major public health problem globally with higher prevalence in developing countries, which leads to negative health outcomes for both mothers and children. Maternal stress varies over the course of pregnancy and the stress occurring in early pregnancy is the most critical. However, few studies have focused on the impact of resilience to stress on mental health of pregnant women. Aims: To explore the effect of resilience to stress on prenatal anxiety/depression in pregnant women. Methods: 2813 participants were recruited from Shanghai Maternal-Child Pairs Cohort (Shanghai MCPC) in this study. The Life Event Scale for Pregnancy Women (LESPW) was used to assess stress at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy and at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy, respectively. Resilience was assessed by the revised Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy. The prenatal anxiety and depression were assessed at 32–26 weeks of pregnancy by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Center for Epidemiological Survey, Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the direct effect of stress and resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression. The indirect effects of mediation were analyzed by structural equation models, and the indirect effect of modification was examined by stratification analysis. Results: There were 11.1{\%} and 10.3{\%} of pregnant women in Shanghai MCPC indicating anxiety and depressive mood, respectively. The stress caused by both subjective and objective events at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy is less than that at 12–16weeks of pregnancy. We found that resilience was a protective factor for maternal mental health and meanwhile it was both an effect modifier and a mediator to the association between stress and prenatal anxiety/depression, with the mediating effect ratio of 15.1{\%} and 23.8{\%}, respectively. Limitations: The existence of recall bias, missing data, and restricted residential areas of the participants may limit the generalizability of the study. The measurements of resilience, prenatal anxiety, and depression were not designed specifically for pregnant women, so that they might have missed some important indications of mental issues related to pregnant women only. Conclusions: Resilience could be a direct and indirect protective factor for prenatal anxiety and depression caused by pregnancy stress.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Depression, Pregnant women, Resilience, Stress",
author = "Xuemei Ma and Ying Wang and Hua Hu and Tao, {Xu Guang} and Yunhui Zhang and Huijing Shi",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "250",
pages = "57--64",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai

AU - Ma, Xuemei

AU - Wang, Ying

AU - Hu, Hua

AU - Tao, Xu Guang

AU - Zhang, Yunhui

AU - Shi, Huijing

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: Prenatal anxiety/depression has been a major public health problem globally with higher prevalence in developing countries, which leads to negative health outcomes for both mothers and children. Maternal stress varies over the course of pregnancy and the stress occurring in early pregnancy is the most critical. However, few studies have focused on the impact of resilience to stress on mental health of pregnant women. Aims: To explore the effect of resilience to stress on prenatal anxiety/depression in pregnant women. Methods: 2813 participants were recruited from Shanghai Maternal-Child Pairs Cohort (Shanghai MCPC) in this study. The Life Event Scale for Pregnancy Women (LESPW) was used to assess stress at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy and at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy, respectively. Resilience was assessed by the revised Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy. The prenatal anxiety and depression were assessed at 32–26 weeks of pregnancy by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Center for Epidemiological Survey, Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the direct effect of stress and resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression. The indirect effects of mediation were analyzed by structural equation models, and the indirect effect of modification was examined by stratification analysis. Results: There were 11.1% and 10.3% of pregnant women in Shanghai MCPC indicating anxiety and depressive mood, respectively. The stress caused by both subjective and objective events at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy is less than that at 12–16weeks of pregnancy. We found that resilience was a protective factor for maternal mental health and meanwhile it was both an effect modifier and a mediator to the association between stress and prenatal anxiety/depression, with the mediating effect ratio of 15.1% and 23.8%, respectively. Limitations: The existence of recall bias, missing data, and restricted residential areas of the participants may limit the generalizability of the study. The measurements of resilience, prenatal anxiety, and depression were not designed specifically for pregnant women, so that they might have missed some important indications of mental issues related to pregnant women only. Conclusions: Resilience could be a direct and indirect protective factor for prenatal anxiety and depression caused by pregnancy stress.

AB - Background: Prenatal anxiety/depression has been a major public health problem globally with higher prevalence in developing countries, which leads to negative health outcomes for both mothers and children. Maternal stress varies over the course of pregnancy and the stress occurring in early pregnancy is the most critical. However, few studies have focused on the impact of resilience to stress on mental health of pregnant women. Aims: To explore the effect of resilience to stress on prenatal anxiety/depression in pregnant women. Methods: 2813 participants were recruited from Shanghai Maternal-Child Pairs Cohort (Shanghai MCPC) in this study. The Life Event Scale for Pregnancy Women (LESPW) was used to assess stress at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy and at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy, respectively. Resilience was assessed by the revised Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy. The prenatal anxiety and depression were assessed at 32–26 weeks of pregnancy by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Center for Epidemiological Survey, Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the direct effect of stress and resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression. The indirect effects of mediation were analyzed by structural equation models, and the indirect effect of modification was examined by stratification analysis. Results: There were 11.1% and 10.3% of pregnant women in Shanghai MCPC indicating anxiety and depressive mood, respectively. The stress caused by both subjective and objective events at 32–36 weeks of pregnancy is less than that at 12–16weeks of pregnancy. We found that resilience was a protective factor for maternal mental health and meanwhile it was both an effect modifier and a mediator to the association between stress and prenatal anxiety/depression, with the mediating effect ratio of 15.1% and 23.8%, respectively. Limitations: The existence of recall bias, missing data, and restricted residential areas of the participants may limit the generalizability of the study. The measurements of resilience, prenatal anxiety, and depression were not designed specifically for pregnant women, so that they might have missed some important indications of mental issues related to pregnant women only. Conclusions: Resilience could be a direct and indirect protective factor for prenatal anxiety and depression caused by pregnancy stress.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Depression

KW - Pregnant women

KW - Resilience

KW - Stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062184986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062184986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.058

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.058

M3 - Article

C2 - 30831542

AN - SCOPUS:85062184986

VL - 250

SP - 57

EP - 64

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -