The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates

Lisa Dubay, Robert Kaestner, Timothy Waidmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A longstanding issue in the health care industry is whether physicians' malpractice fears lead to defensive medicine. We use national birth certificate data from 1990 through 1992 to conduct a county fixed-effects analysis of the impact of malpractice claims risk on cesarean-section rates and infant health. Malpractice claims risk is measured by obstetricians' malpractice premiums. The study provides evidence that physicians practice defensive medicine in obstetrics but that the impact of increased cesarean sections that results from malpractice fears on total obstetric care costs is small. The study also finds that physicians' defensive response varies with the socioeconomic status of the mother.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-522
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cesarean section
  • Defensive medicine
  • Malpractice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this