The impact of interruptions on the duration of nursing interventions

A direct observation study in an academic emergency department

Gai Cole, Dicky Stefanus, Heather Gardner, Matthew Levy, Eili Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Interruptions to nursing workload may contribute to procedural failures and clinical errors impacting quality/safety of care, but the impact of interruptions on the duration of these activities has not been closely scrutinised. This study analyses the effect of interruptions to care provided by nurses and clinical technicians on the length of clinical procedures and interventions (excluding the length of the interruption). Methods An observational time study of the effect of interruptions on common nursing interventions in the emergency department (ED) of a large academic medical centre was conducted. This study used direct observations of nurses and clinical technicians while delivering care to patients. Results The average time spent on an uninterrupted intervention was 296.47 s (median:185.15, SD:319.05), while interrupted interventions took 682.02 s (median:589.63, SD:504.59). Controlling for intervention type and other potential confounding factors using multiple linear regression found that interrupted interventions were 121.36 s (95% CI 79.57 to 163.15) longer, a 19 percentage point increase (95% CI 11.31 to 26.89), than an intervention without (excluding the length of the interruption). Family/patient interruptions effected duration the most while staff interruptions affected the intervention time the least. Discussion Our findings are consistent with outcomes of studies in non-healthcare domains, but are contrary to a study of ED physicians, suggesting differential responses to interruptions by physicians and nurses. Future studies on interruptions in healthcare should thus be discipline specific. Though the effect of interruptions on intervention length is only about 2 min, in an ED setting, this can increase patient risks and costs. To better focus efforts to reduce interruptions future research should focus on further separation of interruption type (eg, urgent vs routine or unnecessary).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-465
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Nursing
Nurses
Observation
Physicians
Time and Motion Studies
Quality of Health Care
Workload
Observational Studies
Linear Models
Patient Care
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The impact of interruptions on the duration of nursing interventions : A direct observation study in an academic emergency department. / Cole, Gai; Stefanus, Dicky; Gardner, Heather; Levy, Matthew; Klein, Eili.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 457-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9896762e51d34018a683cedf63c51375,
title = "The impact of interruptions on the duration of nursing interventions: A direct observation study in an academic emergency department",
abstract = "Background Interruptions to nursing workload may contribute to procedural failures and clinical errors impacting quality/safety of care, but the impact of interruptions on the duration of these activities has not been closely scrutinised. This study analyses the effect of interruptions to care provided by nurses and clinical technicians on the length of clinical procedures and interventions (excluding the length of the interruption). Methods An observational time study of the effect of interruptions on common nursing interventions in the emergency department (ED) of a large academic medical centre was conducted. This study used direct observations of nurses and clinical technicians while delivering care to patients. Results The average time spent on an uninterrupted intervention was 296.47 s (median:185.15, SD:319.05), while interrupted interventions took 682.02 s (median:589.63, SD:504.59). Controlling for intervention type and other potential confounding factors using multiple linear regression found that interrupted interventions were 121.36 s (95{\%} CI 79.57 to 163.15) longer, a 19 percentage point increase (95{\%} CI 11.31 to 26.89), than an intervention without (excluding the length of the interruption). Family/patient interruptions effected duration the most while staff interruptions affected the intervention time the least. Discussion Our findings are consistent with outcomes of studies in non-healthcare domains, but are contrary to a study of ED physicians, suggesting differential responses to interruptions by physicians and nurses. Future studies on interruptions in healthcare should thus be discipline specific. Though the effect of interruptions on intervention length is only about 2 min, in an ED setting, this can increase patient risks and costs. To better focus efforts to reduce interruptions future research should focus on further separation of interruption type (eg, urgent vs routine or unnecessary).",
author = "Gai Cole and Dicky Stefanus and Heather Gardner and Matthew Levy and Eili Klein",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003683",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "457--465",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of interruptions on the duration of nursing interventions

T2 - A direct observation study in an academic emergency department

AU - Cole, Gai

AU - Stefanus, Dicky

AU - Gardner, Heather

AU - Levy, Matthew

AU - Klein, Eili

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Background Interruptions to nursing workload may contribute to procedural failures and clinical errors impacting quality/safety of care, but the impact of interruptions on the duration of these activities has not been closely scrutinised. This study analyses the effect of interruptions to care provided by nurses and clinical technicians on the length of clinical procedures and interventions (excluding the length of the interruption). Methods An observational time study of the effect of interruptions on common nursing interventions in the emergency department (ED) of a large academic medical centre was conducted. This study used direct observations of nurses and clinical technicians while delivering care to patients. Results The average time spent on an uninterrupted intervention was 296.47 s (median:185.15, SD:319.05), while interrupted interventions took 682.02 s (median:589.63, SD:504.59). Controlling for intervention type and other potential confounding factors using multiple linear regression found that interrupted interventions were 121.36 s (95% CI 79.57 to 163.15) longer, a 19 percentage point increase (95% CI 11.31 to 26.89), than an intervention without (excluding the length of the interruption). Family/patient interruptions effected duration the most while staff interruptions affected the intervention time the least. Discussion Our findings are consistent with outcomes of studies in non-healthcare domains, but are contrary to a study of ED physicians, suggesting differential responses to interruptions by physicians and nurses. Future studies on interruptions in healthcare should thus be discipline specific. Though the effect of interruptions on intervention length is only about 2 min, in an ED setting, this can increase patient risks and costs. To better focus efforts to reduce interruptions future research should focus on further separation of interruption type (eg, urgent vs routine or unnecessary).

AB - Background Interruptions to nursing workload may contribute to procedural failures and clinical errors impacting quality/safety of care, but the impact of interruptions on the duration of these activities has not been closely scrutinised. This study analyses the effect of interruptions to care provided by nurses and clinical technicians on the length of clinical procedures and interventions (excluding the length of the interruption). Methods An observational time study of the effect of interruptions on common nursing interventions in the emergency department (ED) of a large academic medical centre was conducted. This study used direct observations of nurses and clinical technicians while delivering care to patients. Results The average time spent on an uninterrupted intervention was 296.47 s (median:185.15, SD:319.05), while interrupted interventions took 682.02 s (median:589.63, SD:504.59). Controlling for intervention type and other potential confounding factors using multiple linear regression found that interrupted interventions were 121.36 s (95% CI 79.57 to 163.15) longer, a 19 percentage point increase (95% CI 11.31 to 26.89), than an intervention without (excluding the length of the interruption). Family/patient interruptions effected duration the most while staff interruptions affected the intervention time the least. Discussion Our findings are consistent with outcomes of studies in non-healthcare domains, but are contrary to a study of ED physicians, suggesting differential responses to interruptions by physicians and nurses. Future studies on interruptions in healthcare should thus be discipline specific. Though the effect of interruptions on intervention length is only about 2 min, in an ED setting, this can increase patient risks and costs. To better focus efforts to reduce interruptions future research should focus on further separation of interruption type (eg, urgent vs routine or unnecessary).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969704176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969704176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003683

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003683

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 457

EP - 465

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 6

ER -