TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Following Solid Food Feeding Guides on BMI Among Infants
T2 - A Simulation Study
AU - Ferguson, Marie C.
AU - O'Shea, Kelly J.
AU - Hammer, Lawrence D.
AU - Hertenstein, Daniel L.
AU - Schwartz, Nathaniel J.
AU - Winch, Lucas E.
AU - Siegmund, Sheryl S.
AU - Lee, Bruce Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by the Global Obesity Prevention Center and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) via grants U01HD086861 and 5R01HD086013-02 , as well as the NICHD and Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) under award number U54HD070725, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) via grant R01HS023317.
Funding Information:
This project was supported by the Global Obesity Prevention Center and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) via grants U01HD086861 and 5R01HD086013-02, as well as the NICHD and Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) under award number U54HD070725, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) via grant R01HS023317. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NICHD, AHRQ, or OBSSR. None of the study sponsors had any role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing the report, or the decision to submit the report for publication. This study was exempt by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health IRB (number 00006667). Author contributions were as follows: MCF, KJO, DLH, NJS, and LEW contributed to model development; MCF and BYL guided model development; MCF, KJO, LDH, SSS, and BYL contributed to results? analysis; MCF, KJO, LDH, SSS, and BYL contributed to manuscript writing; MCF, KJO, and BYL guided simulation experiments; MCF and KJO parameterized model; DLH, NJS, and LEW contributed to model programming; and DLH, NJS, and LEW ran model simulations. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Introduction: There are several recommendations advising caregivers when and how to introduce solid food to infants. These complementary feeding guides vary in terms of the recommendations for timing and portions. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of following different guidelines on weight trajectories of infants. Methods: In 2018, the study team developed a computational simulation model to capture feeding behaviors, activity levels, metabolism, and body size of infants from 6 months to 1 year. Daily food intake of virtual infants based on feeding recommendations translated to changes in body weight. Next, simulations tested the impact of the following complementary feeding recommendations that provided amount, type, and timing of foods: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Enfamil, and Similac. Results: When virtual caregivers fed infants according to the four different guides, none of the simulated situations resulted in normal weight at 12 months when infants were also being breastfed along average observed patterns. Reducing breast milk portions in half while caregivers fed infants according to complementary feeding guidelines resulted in overweight BMIs between 9 and 11 months for Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and Enfamil guidelines. Cutting breast milk portions in half also led to infants reaching unhealthy underweight BMI percentiles between 7 and 11 months for female and male infants when caregivers followed Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and Similac guidelines. Conclusions: This study identified situations in which infants could reach unhealthy weights, even while following complementary feeding guidelines, suggesting that current recommended portion sizes should be tightened.
AB - Introduction: There are several recommendations advising caregivers when and how to introduce solid food to infants. These complementary feeding guides vary in terms of the recommendations for timing and portions. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of following different guidelines on weight trajectories of infants. Methods: In 2018, the study team developed a computational simulation model to capture feeding behaviors, activity levels, metabolism, and body size of infants from 6 months to 1 year. Daily food intake of virtual infants based on feeding recommendations translated to changes in body weight. Next, simulations tested the impact of the following complementary feeding recommendations that provided amount, type, and timing of foods: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Enfamil, and Similac. Results: When virtual caregivers fed infants according to the four different guides, none of the simulated situations resulted in normal weight at 12 months when infants were also being breastfed along average observed patterns. Reducing breast milk portions in half while caregivers fed infants according to complementary feeding guidelines resulted in overweight BMIs between 9 and 11 months for Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and Enfamil guidelines. Cutting breast milk portions in half also led to infants reaching unhealthy underweight BMI percentiles between 7 and 11 months for female and male infants when caregivers followed Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and Similac guidelines. Conclusions: This study identified situations in which infants could reach unhealthy weights, even while following complementary feeding guidelines, suggesting that current recommended portion sizes should be tightened.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070634553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070634553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.011
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 31353163
AN - SCOPUS:85070634553
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 57
SP - 355
EP - 364
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 3
ER -