TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of consumer-directed health plans and patient socioeconomic status on physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening
AU - Pollack, Craig Evan
AU - Mallya, Giridhar
AU - Polsky, Daniel
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for the study was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program at the University of Pennsylvania. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. Drs. Pollack and Mallya had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. This work has been presented at the annual meetings of the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (Fort Lauderdale, November 2007) and the North American Primary Care Research Group (Vancouver, October 2007) Funding for the study was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program at the University of Pennsylvania.
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: Consumer-directed health plans are increasingly common, yet little is known about their impact on physician decision-making and preventive service use. OBJECTIVE: To determine how patients' deductible levels and socioeconomic status may affect primary care physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Screening recommendations were elicited using hypothetical vignettes from a national sample of 1,500 primary care physicians. Physicians were randomized to one of four vignettes describing a patient with either low or high socioeconomic status (SES) and either low- or high-deductible plan. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine how recommendations varied as a function of SES and deductible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of recommendation for home fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and inappropriate screening, defined as no screening or office-based fecal occult blood testing. RESULTS: A total of 528 (49%) eligible physicians responded. Overall, 7.2% of physicians recommended inappropriate screening; 3.2% of patients with high SES in low-deductible plans received inappropriate screening recommendations and 11.4% of patients with low SES in high-deductible plans for an adjusted odds ratio of 0.22 (0.05-0.89). The odds of a colonoscopy recommendation were over ten times higher (AOR 11.46, 5.26-24.94) for patients with high SES in low-deductible plans compared to patients with low SES in high-deductible plans. Funds in medical savings accounts eliminated differences in inappropriate screening recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient SES and deductible-level affect physician recommendations for preventive care. Coverage of preventive services and funds in medical savings accounts may help to mitigate the impact of high-deductibles and SES on inappropriate recommendations.
AB - BACKGROUND: Consumer-directed health plans are increasingly common, yet little is known about their impact on physician decision-making and preventive service use. OBJECTIVE: To determine how patients' deductible levels and socioeconomic status may affect primary care physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Screening recommendations were elicited using hypothetical vignettes from a national sample of 1,500 primary care physicians. Physicians were randomized to one of four vignettes describing a patient with either low or high socioeconomic status (SES) and either low- or high-deductible plan. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine how recommendations varied as a function of SES and deductible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of recommendation for home fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and inappropriate screening, defined as no screening or office-based fecal occult blood testing. RESULTS: A total of 528 (49%) eligible physicians responded. Overall, 7.2% of physicians recommended inappropriate screening; 3.2% of patients with high SES in low-deductible plans received inappropriate screening recommendations and 11.4% of patients with low SES in high-deductible plans for an adjusted odds ratio of 0.22 (0.05-0.89). The odds of a colonoscopy recommendation were over ten times higher (AOR 11.46, 5.26-24.94) for patients with high SES in low-deductible plans compared to patients with low SES in high-deductible plans. Funds in medical savings accounts eliminated differences in inappropriate screening recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient SES and deductible-level affect physician recommendations for preventive care. Coverage of preventive services and funds in medical savings accounts may help to mitigate the impact of high-deductibles and SES on inappropriate recommendations.
KW - Colorectal cancer screening
KW - Consumer-directed health plans
KW - Patient socioeconomic status
KW - Physician decision-making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51649121029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51649121029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-008-0714-x
DO - 10.1007/s11606-008-0714-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 18629590
AN - SCOPUS:51649121029
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 23
SP - 1595
EP - 1601
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 10
ER -