The healthiest company index: A campaign to promote worksite wellness in South Africa

Deepak Patel, Ron Z. Goetzel, Meghan Beckowski, Karen Milner, Mike Greyling, Roseanne Da Silva, Tracy Kolbe-Alexander, Maryam J. Tabrizi, Craig Nossel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective:: To describe a 2010 initiative to encourage companies in South Africa to adopt workplace health promotion programs. Methods:: Data documenting organizational efforts to improve workers' health were collected from 71 participating employers and 11,472 workers completing health assessments. Organizational and employee health were scored on the basis of responses to the surveys that asked about facilities and programs offered, leadership support for health promotion, and employees' health status. Results:: In its first year, the initiative recruited 101 organizations and 71 qualified for the award. Results aggregated across these companies focus on elements constituting organizational and individual health, with specific measures that companies can review to determine whether they and their employees are "healthy." Conclusions:: The Healthiest Company Index provided useful baseline data to support employers' efforts to develop and implement effective and impactful health promotion programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-178
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental medicine
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The healthiest company index: A campaign to promote worksite wellness in South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Patel, D., Goetzel, R. Z., Beckowski, M., Milner, K., Greyling, M., Da Silva, R., Kolbe-Alexander, T., Tabrizi, M. J., & Nossel, C. (2013). The healthiest company index: A campaign to promote worksite wellness in South Africa. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 55(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182728d61