The growing regulation of conversion therapy

Jack Drescher, Alan Schwartz, Flavio Casoy, Christopher A. McIntosh, Brian Hurley, Kenneth Ashley, Mary Barber, David Goldenberg, Sarah E. Herbert, Lorraine E. Lothwell, Marlin R. Mattson, Scot G. McAfee, Jack Pula, Vernon Rosario, D. Andrew Tompkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Conversion therapies are any treatments, including individual talk therapy, behavioral (e.g. aversive stimuli), group therapy or milieu (e.g. "retreats or inpatient treatments" relying on all of the above methods) treatments, which attempt to change an individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. However, these practices have been repudiated by major mental health organizations because of increasing evidence that they are ineffective and may cause harm to patients and their families who fail to change. At present, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Washington, D.C., and the Canadian Province of Ontario have passed legislation banning conversion therapy for minors and an increasing number of U.S. States are considering similar bans. In April 2015, the Obama administration also called for a ban on conversion therapies for minors. The growing trend toward banning conversion therapies creates challenges for licensing boards and ethics committees, most of which are unfamiliar with the issues raised by complaints against conversion therapists. This paper reviews the history of conversion therapy practices as well as clinical, ethical and research issues they raise. With this information, state licensing boards, ethics committees and other regulatory bodies will be better able to adjudicate complaints from members of the public who have been exposed to conversion therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-12
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Medical Licensure and Discipline
Volume102
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

regulation
ban
complaint
Minors
Therapeutics
Ethics Committees
moral philosophy
Licensure
inpatient treatment
group therapy
sexual orientation
homosexuality
Patient Harm
therapist
stimulus
Heterosexuality
Ontario
mental health
legislation
Group Psychotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Health Policy
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

Drescher, J., Schwartz, A., Casoy, F., McIntosh, C. A., Hurley, B., Ashley, K., ... Tompkins, D. A. (2016). The growing regulation of conversion therapy. Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline, 102(2), 7-12.

The growing regulation of conversion therapy. / Drescher, Jack; Schwartz, Alan; Casoy, Flavio; McIntosh, Christopher A.; Hurley, Brian; Ashley, Kenneth; Barber, Mary; Goldenberg, David; Herbert, Sarah E.; Lothwell, Lorraine E.; Mattson, Marlin R.; McAfee, Scot G.; Pula, Jack; Rosario, Vernon; Tompkins, D. Andrew.

In: Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2016, p. 7-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Drescher, J, Schwartz, A, Casoy, F, McIntosh, CA, Hurley, B, Ashley, K, Barber, M, Goldenberg, D, Herbert, SE, Lothwell, LE, Mattson, MR, McAfee, SG, Pula, J, Rosario, V & Tompkins, DA 2016, 'The growing regulation of conversion therapy', Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 7-12.
Drescher J, Schwartz A, Casoy F, McIntosh CA, Hurley B, Ashley K et al. The growing regulation of conversion therapy. Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline. 2016;102(2):7-12.
Drescher, Jack ; Schwartz, Alan ; Casoy, Flavio ; McIntosh, Christopher A. ; Hurley, Brian ; Ashley, Kenneth ; Barber, Mary ; Goldenberg, David ; Herbert, Sarah E. ; Lothwell, Lorraine E. ; Mattson, Marlin R. ; McAfee, Scot G. ; Pula, Jack ; Rosario, Vernon ; Tompkins, D. Andrew. / The growing regulation of conversion therapy. In: Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline. 2016 ; Vol. 102, No. 2. pp. 7-12.
@article{e4e2210120ae411b974d6ddd856f7279,
title = "The growing regulation of conversion therapy",
abstract = "Conversion therapies are any treatments, including individual talk therapy, behavioral (e.g. aversive stimuli), group therapy or milieu (e.g. {"}retreats or inpatient treatments{"} relying on all of the above methods) treatments, which attempt to change an individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. However, these practices have been repudiated by major mental health organizations because of increasing evidence that they are ineffective and may cause harm to patients and their families who fail to change. At present, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Washington, D.C., and the Canadian Province of Ontario have passed legislation banning conversion therapy for minors and an increasing number of U.S. States are considering similar bans. In April 2015, the Obama administration also called for a ban on conversion therapies for minors. The growing trend toward banning conversion therapies creates challenges for licensing boards and ethics committees, most of which are unfamiliar with the issues raised by complaints against conversion therapists. This paper reviews the history of conversion therapy practices as well as clinical, ethical and research issues they raise. With this information, state licensing boards, ethics committees and other regulatory bodies will be better able to adjudicate complaints from members of the public who have been exposed to conversion therapies.",
author = "Jack Drescher and Alan Schwartz and Flavio Casoy and McIntosh, {Christopher A.} and Brian Hurley and Kenneth Ashley and Mary Barber and David Goldenberg and Herbert, {Sarah E.} and Lothwell, {Lorraine E.} and Mattson, {Marlin R.} and McAfee, {Scot G.} and Jack Pula and Vernon Rosario and Tompkins, {D. Andrew}",
year = "2016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "7--12",
journal = "Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline",
issn = "1547-481X",
publisher = "Federation of State Medical Boards",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The growing regulation of conversion therapy

AU - Drescher, Jack

AU - Schwartz, Alan

AU - Casoy, Flavio

AU - McIntosh, Christopher A.

AU - Hurley, Brian

AU - Ashley, Kenneth

AU - Barber, Mary

AU - Goldenberg, David

AU - Herbert, Sarah E.

AU - Lothwell, Lorraine E.

AU - Mattson, Marlin R.

AU - McAfee, Scot G.

AU - Pula, Jack

AU - Rosario, Vernon

AU - Tompkins, D. Andrew

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Conversion therapies are any treatments, including individual talk therapy, behavioral (e.g. aversive stimuli), group therapy or milieu (e.g. "retreats or inpatient treatments" relying on all of the above methods) treatments, which attempt to change an individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. However, these practices have been repudiated by major mental health organizations because of increasing evidence that they are ineffective and may cause harm to patients and their families who fail to change. At present, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Washington, D.C., and the Canadian Province of Ontario have passed legislation banning conversion therapy for minors and an increasing number of U.S. States are considering similar bans. In April 2015, the Obama administration also called for a ban on conversion therapies for minors. The growing trend toward banning conversion therapies creates challenges for licensing boards and ethics committees, most of which are unfamiliar with the issues raised by complaints against conversion therapists. This paper reviews the history of conversion therapy practices as well as clinical, ethical and research issues they raise. With this information, state licensing boards, ethics committees and other regulatory bodies will be better able to adjudicate complaints from members of the public who have been exposed to conversion therapies.

AB - Conversion therapies are any treatments, including individual talk therapy, behavioral (e.g. aversive stimuli), group therapy or milieu (e.g. "retreats or inpatient treatments" relying on all of the above methods) treatments, which attempt to change an individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. However, these practices have been repudiated by major mental health organizations because of increasing evidence that they are ineffective and may cause harm to patients and their families who fail to change. At present, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Washington, D.C., and the Canadian Province of Ontario have passed legislation banning conversion therapy for minors and an increasing number of U.S. States are considering similar bans. In April 2015, the Obama administration also called for a ban on conversion therapies for minors. The growing trend toward banning conversion therapies creates challenges for licensing boards and ethics committees, most of which are unfamiliar with the issues raised by complaints against conversion therapists. This paper reviews the history of conversion therapy practices as well as clinical, ethical and research issues they raise. With this information, state licensing boards, ethics committees and other regulatory bodies will be better able to adjudicate complaints from members of the public who have been exposed to conversion therapies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994424513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994424513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994424513

VL - 102

SP - 7

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline

JF - Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline

SN - 1547-481X

IS - 2

ER -