The genomic CDS sandbox: An assessment among domain experts

Ayesha Aziz, Kensaku Kawamoto, Karen Eilbeck, Marc S. Williams, Robert R. Freimuth, Mark A. Hoffman, Luke V. Rasmussen, Casey L. Overby, Brian H. Shirts, James M. Hoffman, Brandon M. Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Genomics is a promising tool that is becoming more widely available to improve the care and treatment of individuals. While there is much assertion, genomics will most certainly require the use of clinical decision support (CDS) to be fully realized in the routine clinical setting. The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) of the National Institutes of Health recently convened an in-person, multi-day meeting on this topic. It was widely recognized that there is a need to promote the innovation and development of resources for genomic CDS such as a CDS sandbox. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a proposed approach for such a genomic CDS sandbox among domain experts and potential users. Survey results indicate a significant interest and desire for a genomic CDS sandbox environment among domain experts. These results will be used to guide the development of a genomic CDS sandbox.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-94
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Keywords

  • Clinical decision support systems
  • Genomics
  • Health information technology
  • Medical genetics
  • Personalized medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The genomic CDS sandbox: An assessment among domain experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Aziz, A., Kawamoto, K., Eilbeck, K., Williams, M. S., Freimuth, R. R., Hoffman, M. A., Rasmussen, L. V., Overby, C. L., Shirts, B. H., Hoffman, J. M., & Welch, B. M. (2016). The genomic CDS sandbox: An assessment among domain experts. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 60, 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.019