The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women

Leonard Derogatis, Raymond Rosen, Sandra Leiblum, Arthur Burnett, Julia Heiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent consensus-based characterizations of female sexual dysfunction have emphasized personal distress as an essential component of their definition. To assist researchers and clinicians, we developed a new scale, the Female Sexual Distress Scale, to measure sexually related personal distress in women. In this article, we describe the initial stages in the development and validation of this instrument. Three studies involving a total of approximately 500 women were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale in different samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Results indicated a unidimensional factor structure in both the original 20-item version and in a "polished" 12-item version. We observed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both versions across all three studies. Additionally, the scale showed a high degree of discriminative ability to distinguish between sexually dysfunctional and functional women in each of the studies. One study also showed a strong sensitivity to treatment response. Finally, we observed moderate positive correlations with other conceptually related nonsexual measures of distress, supporting the construct validity of the scale. Overall, these findings provide solid support for the FSDS as a valid and reliable measure for assessing sexually related personal distress in women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-330
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Sex and Marital Therapy
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
construct validity
Research Personnel
ability
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) : Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. / Derogatis, Leonard; Rosen, Raymond; Leiblum, Sandra; Burnett, Arthur; Heiman, Julia.

In: Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2002, p. 317-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{defba57fa744437f9af6177079551cb3,
title = "The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women",
abstract = "Recent consensus-based characterizations of female sexual dysfunction have emphasized personal distress as an essential component of their definition. To assist researchers and clinicians, we developed a new scale, the Female Sexual Distress Scale, to measure sexually related personal distress in women. In this article, we describe the initial stages in the development and validation of this instrument. Three studies involving a total of approximately 500 women were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale in different samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Results indicated a unidimensional factor structure in both the original 20-item version and in a {"}polished{"} 12-item version. We observed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both versions across all three studies. Additionally, the scale showed a high degree of discriminative ability to distinguish between sexually dysfunctional and functional women in each of the studies. One study also showed a strong sensitivity to treatment response. Finally, we observed moderate positive correlations with other conceptually related nonsexual measures of distress, supporting the construct validity of the scale. Overall, these findings provide solid support for the FSDS as a valid and reliable measure for assessing sexually related personal distress in women.",
author = "Leonard Derogatis and Raymond Rosen and Sandra Leiblum and Arthur Burnett and Julia Heiman",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/00926230290001448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "317--330",
journal = "Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy",
issn = "0092-623X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS)

T2 - Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women

AU - Derogatis, Leonard

AU - Rosen, Raymond

AU - Leiblum, Sandra

AU - Burnett, Arthur

AU - Heiman, Julia

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Recent consensus-based characterizations of female sexual dysfunction have emphasized personal distress as an essential component of their definition. To assist researchers and clinicians, we developed a new scale, the Female Sexual Distress Scale, to measure sexually related personal distress in women. In this article, we describe the initial stages in the development and validation of this instrument. Three studies involving a total of approximately 500 women were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale in different samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Results indicated a unidimensional factor structure in both the original 20-item version and in a "polished" 12-item version. We observed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both versions across all three studies. Additionally, the scale showed a high degree of discriminative ability to distinguish between sexually dysfunctional and functional women in each of the studies. One study also showed a strong sensitivity to treatment response. Finally, we observed moderate positive correlations with other conceptually related nonsexual measures of distress, supporting the construct validity of the scale. Overall, these findings provide solid support for the FSDS as a valid and reliable measure for assessing sexually related personal distress in women.

AB - Recent consensus-based characterizations of female sexual dysfunction have emphasized personal distress as an essential component of their definition. To assist researchers and clinicians, we developed a new scale, the Female Sexual Distress Scale, to measure sexually related personal distress in women. In this article, we describe the initial stages in the development and validation of this instrument. Three studies involving a total of approximately 500 women were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale in different samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Results indicated a unidimensional factor structure in both the original 20-item version and in a "polished" 12-item version. We observed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both versions across all three studies. Additionally, the scale showed a high degree of discriminative ability to distinguish between sexually dysfunctional and functional women in each of the studies. One study also showed a strong sensitivity to treatment response. Finally, we observed moderate positive correlations with other conceptually related nonsexual measures of distress, supporting the construct validity of the scale. Overall, these findings provide solid support for the FSDS as a valid and reliable measure for assessing sexually related personal distress in women.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035989571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035989571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00926230290001448

DO - 10.1080/00926230290001448

M3 - Article

C2 - 12082670

AN - SCOPUS:0035989571

VL - 28

SP - 317

EP - 330

JO - Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

JF - Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

SN - 0092-623X

IS - 4

ER -