The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA): Effects after 24 and 30 months

Hein de Vries, Froukje Dijk, Joyce Wetzels, Aart Mudde, Stef Kremers, Carles Ariza, Paulo Duarte Vitória, Anne Fielder, Klavs Holm, Karin Janssen, Riku Lehtovuori, Math Candel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) study in six countries tested the effects of a comprehensive smoking prevention approach after 24 (T3; N 5 10 751) and 30 months (T4; N 5 9282). The programme targeted four levels, i.e. adolescents in schools, school policies, parents and the community. In Portugal, 12.4% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking at T4 compared to 7.9% of the experimental group. Smoking onset in the experimental group was thus 36% lower. In Finland, 32.4% of the T1 nonsmokers started smoking compared to 27.6% of the experimental group, implying a 15% lower onset in the experimental group. In Spain, 33.0% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking, compared to 29.1% of the experimental group, implying a 12% lower onset. In The Netherlands, the ESFA programme was effective for non-native adolescents with 11.4% new weekly smokers compared to 19.9% in the control group. An opposite effect was found in native Dutch adolescents with 19.0% new weekly smokers in the comparison group compared to 24.0% new smokers in the experimental group. Future programmes should use more standardized ways to assess process evaluations and should assess which elements are responsible for behavioral effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume280
Issue number1761
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 22 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

smoking
Smoking
Portugal
Finland
Netherlands
Control Groups
Spain
effect
Parents
programme

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA) : Effects after 24 and 30 months. / de Vries, Hein; Dijk, Froukje; Wetzels, Joyce; Mudde, Aart; Kremers, Stef; Ariza, Carles; Vitória, Paulo Duarte; Fielder, Anne; Holm, Klavs; Janssen, Karin; Lehtovuori, Riku; Candel, Math.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 280, No. 1761, 22.06.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

de Vries, H, Dijk, F, Wetzels, J, Mudde, A, Kremers, S, Ariza, C, Vitória, PD, Fielder, A, Holm, K, Janssen, K, Lehtovuori, R & Candel, M 2013, 'The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA): Effects after 24 and 30 months', Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 280, no. 1761. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh048
de Vries, Hein ; Dijk, Froukje ; Wetzels, Joyce ; Mudde, Aart ; Kremers, Stef ; Ariza, Carles ; Vitória, Paulo Duarte ; Fielder, Anne ; Holm, Klavs ; Janssen, Karin ; Lehtovuori, Riku ; Candel, Math. / The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA) : Effects after 24 and 30 months. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 280, No. 1761.
@article{3e091f0ac03349fb886812481e549371,
title = "The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA): Effects after 24 and 30 months",
abstract = "The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) study in six countries tested the effects of a comprehensive smoking prevention approach after 24 (T3; N 5 10 751) and 30 months (T4; N 5 9282). The programme targeted four levels, i.e. adolescents in schools, school policies, parents and the community. In Portugal, 12.4{\%} of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking at T4 compared to 7.9{\%} of the experimental group. Smoking onset in the experimental group was thus 36{\%} lower. In Finland, 32.4{\%} of the T1 nonsmokers started smoking compared to 27.6{\%} of the experimental group, implying a 15{\%} lower onset in the experimental group. In Spain, 33.0{\%} of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking, compared to 29.1{\%} of the experimental group, implying a 12{\%} lower onset. In The Netherlands, the ESFA programme was effective for non-native adolescents with 11.4{\%} new weekly smokers compared to 19.9{\%} in the control group. An opposite effect was found in native Dutch adolescents with 19.0{\%} new weekly smokers in the comparison group compared to 24.0{\%} new smokers in the experimental group. Future programmes should use more standardized ways to assess process evaluations and should assess which elements are responsible for behavioral effects.",
author = "{de Vries}, Hein and Froukje Dijk and Joyce Wetzels and Aart Mudde and Stef Kremers and Carles Ariza and Vit{\'o}ria, {Paulo Duarte} and Anne Fielder and Klavs Holm and Karin Janssen and Riku Lehtovuori and Math Candel",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/her/cyh048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "280",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0800-4622",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1761",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA)

T2 - Effects after 24 and 30 months

AU - de Vries, Hein

AU - Dijk, Froukje

AU - Wetzels, Joyce

AU - Mudde, Aart

AU - Kremers, Stef

AU - Ariza, Carles

AU - Vitória, Paulo Duarte

AU - Fielder, Anne

AU - Holm, Klavs

AU - Janssen, Karin

AU - Lehtovuori, Riku

AU - Candel, Math

PY - 2013/6/22

Y1 - 2013/6/22

N2 - The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) study in six countries tested the effects of a comprehensive smoking prevention approach after 24 (T3; N 5 10 751) and 30 months (T4; N 5 9282). The programme targeted four levels, i.e. adolescents in schools, school policies, parents and the community. In Portugal, 12.4% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking at T4 compared to 7.9% of the experimental group. Smoking onset in the experimental group was thus 36% lower. In Finland, 32.4% of the T1 nonsmokers started smoking compared to 27.6% of the experimental group, implying a 15% lower onset in the experimental group. In Spain, 33.0% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking, compared to 29.1% of the experimental group, implying a 12% lower onset. In The Netherlands, the ESFA programme was effective for non-native adolescents with 11.4% new weekly smokers compared to 19.9% in the control group. An opposite effect was found in native Dutch adolescents with 19.0% new weekly smokers in the comparison group compared to 24.0% new smokers in the experimental group. Future programmes should use more standardized ways to assess process evaluations and should assess which elements are responsible for behavioral effects.

AB - The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) study in six countries tested the effects of a comprehensive smoking prevention approach after 24 (T3; N 5 10 751) and 30 months (T4; N 5 9282). The programme targeted four levels, i.e. adolescents in schools, school policies, parents and the community. In Portugal, 12.4% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking at T4 compared to 7.9% of the experimental group. Smoking onset in the experimental group was thus 36% lower. In Finland, 32.4% of the T1 nonsmokers started smoking compared to 27.6% of the experimental group, implying a 15% lower onset in the experimental group. In Spain, 33.0% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking, compared to 29.1% of the experimental group, implying a 12% lower onset. In The Netherlands, the ESFA programme was effective for non-native adolescents with 11.4% new weekly smokers compared to 19.9% in the control group. An opposite effect was found in native Dutch adolescents with 19.0% new weekly smokers in the comparison group compared to 24.0% new smokers in the experimental group. Future programmes should use more standardized ways to assess process evaluations and should assess which elements are responsible for behavioral effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876585817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876585817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/her/cyh048

DO - 10.1093/her/cyh048

M3 - Article

C2 - 16087692

AN - SCOPUS:32644447253

VL - 280

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0800-4622

IS - 1761

ER -