The ethical review of health care quality improvement initiatives

findings from the field.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Questions have been raised about whether and how health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives ought to be reviewed to address possible ethical issues associated with them. These questions have focused primarily on whether some QI initiatives meet the regulatory criteria for human subject research and should therefore be regulated and reviewed as such. Based on surveys of health care system professionals conducting QI initiatives and hospital CEOs, this issue brief finds that QI initiatives are routinely reviewed by a variety of internal mechanisms prior to implementation, although rarely through an institutional review board or another independent body charged specifically with ethical oversight of QI initiatives. Further research, the authors say, is needed to achieve a better understanding of how review mechanisms for QI initiatives are structured, including information on who reviews these activities, how they are reviewed, and whether such processes include an ethical assessment of the proposed QI initiative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalIssue brief (Commonwealth Fund)
Volume95
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Ethical Review
Quality Improvement
Delivery of Health Care
Hospital Chief Executive Officers
Research Ethics Committees
Research
Ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{e796456b632d487b8fb01307163336f0,
title = "The ethical review of health care quality improvement initiatives: findings from the field.",
abstract = "Questions have been raised about whether and how health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives ought to be reviewed to address possible ethical issues associated with them. These questions have focused primarily on whether some QI initiatives meet the regulatory criteria for human subject research and should therefore be regulated and reviewed as such. Based on surveys of health care system professionals conducting QI initiatives and hospital CEOs, this issue brief finds that QI initiatives are routinely reviewed by a variety of internal mechanisms prior to implementation, although rarely through an institutional review board or another independent body charged specifically with ethical oversight of QI initiatives. Further research, the authors say, is needed to achieve a better understanding of how review mechanisms for QI initiatives are structured, including information on who reviews these activities, how they are reviewed, and whether such processes include an ethical assessment of the proposed QI initiative.",
author = "Holly Taylor and Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Faden, {Ruth R} and Kass, {Nancy E} and Jeremy Sugarman",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund)",
issn = "1558-6847",
publisher = "Commonwealth Fund",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethical review of health care quality improvement initiatives

T2 - findings from the field.

AU - Taylor, Holly

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Faden, Ruth R

AU - Kass, Nancy E

AU - Sugarman, Jeremy

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Questions have been raised about whether and how health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives ought to be reviewed to address possible ethical issues associated with them. These questions have focused primarily on whether some QI initiatives meet the regulatory criteria for human subject research and should therefore be regulated and reviewed as such. Based on surveys of health care system professionals conducting QI initiatives and hospital CEOs, this issue brief finds that QI initiatives are routinely reviewed by a variety of internal mechanisms prior to implementation, although rarely through an institutional review board or another independent body charged specifically with ethical oversight of QI initiatives. Further research, the authors say, is needed to achieve a better understanding of how review mechanisms for QI initiatives are structured, including information on who reviews these activities, how they are reviewed, and whether such processes include an ethical assessment of the proposed QI initiative.

AB - Questions have been raised about whether and how health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives ought to be reviewed to address possible ethical issues associated with them. These questions have focused primarily on whether some QI initiatives meet the regulatory criteria for human subject research and should therefore be regulated and reviewed as such. Based on surveys of health care system professionals conducting QI initiatives and hospital CEOs, this issue brief finds that QI initiatives are routinely reviewed by a variety of internal mechanisms prior to implementation, although rarely through an institutional review board or another independent body charged specifically with ethical oversight of QI initiatives. Further research, the authors say, is needed to achieve a better understanding of how review mechanisms for QI initiatives are structured, including information on who reviews these activities, how they are reviewed, and whether such processes include an ethical assessment of the proposed QI initiative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955942131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955942131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund)

JF - Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund)

SN - 1558-6847

ER -