The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate

Alexander J J Smits, J. Alain Kummer, Peter C. De Bruin, Mijke Bol, Jan G. Van Den Tweel, Kees A. Seldenrijk, Stefan M. Willems, G. Johan A Offerhaus, Roel A. De Weger, Paul J. Van Diest, Aryan Vink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Molecular pathology is becoming more and more important in present day pathology. A major challenge for any molecular test is its ability to reliably detect mutations in samples consisting of mixtures of tumor cells and normal cells, especially when the tumor content is low. The minimum percentage of tumor cells required to detect genetic abnormalities is a major variable. Information on tumor cell percentage is essential for a correct interpretation of the result. In daily practice, the percentage of tumor cells is estimated by pathologists on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, the reliability of which has been questioned. This study aimed to determine the reliability of estimated tumor cell percentages in tissue samples by pathologists. On 47 H&E-stained slides of lung tumors a tumor area was marked. The percentage of tumor cells within this area was estimated independently by nine pathologists, using categories of 0-5%, 6-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%, and so on, until 91-100%. As gold standard, the percentage of tumor cells was counted manually. On average, the range between the lowest and the highest estimate per sample was 6.3 categories. In 33% of estimates, the deviation from the gold standard was at least three categories. The mean absolute deviation was 2.0 categories (range between observers 1.5-3.1 categories). There was a significant difference between the observers (P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-174
Number of pages7
JournalModern Pathology
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Pathologists
Molecular Pathology
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Pathology
Lung
Mutation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Smits, A. J. J., Kummer, J. A., De Bruin, P. C., Bol, M., Van Den Tweel, J. G., Seldenrijk, K. A., ... Vink, A. (2014). The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate. Modern Pathology, 27(2), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.134

The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate. / Smits, Alexander J J; Kummer, J. Alain; De Bruin, Peter C.; Bol, Mijke; Van Den Tweel, Jan G.; Seldenrijk, Kees A.; Willems, Stefan M.; Offerhaus, G. Johan A; De Weger, Roel A.; Van Diest, Paul J.; Vink, Aryan.

In: Modern Pathology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 168-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smits, AJJ, Kummer, JA, De Bruin, PC, Bol, M, Van Den Tweel, JG, Seldenrijk, KA, Willems, SM, Offerhaus, GJA, De Weger, RA, Van Diest, PJ & Vink, A 2014, 'The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate', Modern Pathology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.134
Smits AJJ, Kummer JA, De Bruin PC, Bol M, Van Den Tweel JG, Seldenrijk KA et al. The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate. Modern Pathology. 2014 Feb;27(2):168-174. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.134
Smits, Alexander J J ; Kummer, J. Alain ; De Bruin, Peter C. ; Bol, Mijke ; Van Den Tweel, Jan G. ; Seldenrijk, Kees A. ; Willems, Stefan M. ; Offerhaus, G. Johan A ; De Weger, Roel A. ; Van Diest, Paul J. ; Vink, Aryan. / The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate. In: Modern Pathology. 2014 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 168-174.
@article{09e48e0845784461a08e08ae3c3908c3,
title = "The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate",
abstract = "Molecular pathology is becoming more and more important in present day pathology. A major challenge for any molecular test is its ability to reliably detect mutations in samples consisting of mixtures of tumor cells and normal cells, especially when the tumor content is low. The minimum percentage of tumor cells required to detect genetic abnormalities is a major variable. Information on tumor cell percentage is essential for a correct interpretation of the result. In daily practice, the percentage of tumor cells is estimated by pathologists on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, the reliability of which has been questioned. This study aimed to determine the reliability of estimated tumor cell percentages in tissue samples by pathologists. On 47 H&E-stained slides of lung tumors a tumor area was marked. The percentage of tumor cells within this area was estimated independently by nine pathologists, using categories of 0-5{\%}, 6-10{\%}, 11-20{\%}, 21-30{\%}, and so on, until 91-100{\%}. As gold standard, the percentage of tumor cells was counted manually. On average, the range between the lowest and the highest estimate per sample was 6.3 categories. In 33{\%} of estimates, the deviation from the gold standard was at least three categories. The mean absolute deviation was 2.0 categories (range between observers 1.5-3.1 categories). There was a significant difference between the observers (P",
author = "Smits, {Alexander J J} and Kummer, {J. Alain} and {De Bruin}, {Peter C.} and Mijke Bol and {Van Den Tweel}, {Jan G.} and Seldenrijk, {Kees A.} and Willems, {Stefan M.} and Offerhaus, {G. Johan A} and {De Weger}, {Roel A.} and {Van Diest}, {Paul J.} and Aryan Vink",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1038/modpathol.2013.134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "168--174",
journal = "Modern Pathology",
issn = "0893-3952",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The estimation of tumor cell percentage for molecular testing by pathologists is not accurate

AU - Smits, Alexander J J

AU - Kummer, J. Alain

AU - De Bruin, Peter C.

AU - Bol, Mijke

AU - Van Den Tweel, Jan G.

AU - Seldenrijk, Kees A.

AU - Willems, Stefan M.

AU - Offerhaus, G. Johan A

AU - De Weger, Roel A.

AU - Van Diest, Paul J.

AU - Vink, Aryan

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Molecular pathology is becoming more and more important in present day pathology. A major challenge for any molecular test is its ability to reliably detect mutations in samples consisting of mixtures of tumor cells and normal cells, especially when the tumor content is low. The minimum percentage of tumor cells required to detect genetic abnormalities is a major variable. Information on tumor cell percentage is essential for a correct interpretation of the result. In daily practice, the percentage of tumor cells is estimated by pathologists on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, the reliability of which has been questioned. This study aimed to determine the reliability of estimated tumor cell percentages in tissue samples by pathologists. On 47 H&E-stained slides of lung tumors a tumor area was marked. The percentage of tumor cells within this area was estimated independently by nine pathologists, using categories of 0-5%, 6-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%, and so on, until 91-100%. As gold standard, the percentage of tumor cells was counted manually. On average, the range between the lowest and the highest estimate per sample was 6.3 categories. In 33% of estimates, the deviation from the gold standard was at least three categories. The mean absolute deviation was 2.0 categories (range between observers 1.5-3.1 categories). There was a significant difference between the observers (P

AB - Molecular pathology is becoming more and more important in present day pathology. A major challenge for any molecular test is its ability to reliably detect mutations in samples consisting of mixtures of tumor cells and normal cells, especially when the tumor content is low. The minimum percentage of tumor cells required to detect genetic abnormalities is a major variable. Information on tumor cell percentage is essential for a correct interpretation of the result. In daily practice, the percentage of tumor cells is estimated by pathologists on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, the reliability of which has been questioned. This study aimed to determine the reliability of estimated tumor cell percentages in tissue samples by pathologists. On 47 H&E-stained slides of lung tumors a tumor area was marked. The percentage of tumor cells within this area was estimated independently by nine pathologists, using categories of 0-5%, 6-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%, and so on, until 91-100%. As gold standard, the percentage of tumor cells was counted manually. On average, the range between the lowest and the highest estimate per sample was 6.3 categories. In 33% of estimates, the deviation from the gold standard was at least three categories. The mean absolute deviation was 2.0 categories (range between observers 1.5-3.1 categories). There was a significant difference between the observers (P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893744718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893744718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/modpathol.2013.134

DO - 10.1038/modpathol.2013.134

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 168

EP - 174

JO - Modern Pathology

JF - Modern Pathology

SN - 0893-3952

IS - 2

ER -