The ergonomics of women in surgery

Erica Sutton, Myra Irvin, Craig Zeigler, Gyusung Lee, Adrian Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Among surgeons who regularly perform minimally invasive surgery, as many as 87 % report injuries or symptoms related to job performance. Operating room and instrument design have traditionally favored surgeons who are taller and who possess hands that are, in general, large and strong. We hypothesize that women may be experiencing more ergonomic difficulties than men for whom the operating room and surgical instruments, although uniformly perilous, more traditionally have accommodated. Methods: A 23-item web-based survey was offered via email to 2,000 laparoscopic surgeons and fellows currently practicing. The survey addressed four categories: demographics, physical symptoms, ergonomics, and environment/equipment. Key questions allowed us to identify which body part experienced which symptoms. Results: There was a 15.7 % overall response rate. Among respondents, 17 % (54/314) were female. Women were significantly younger, shorter, had smaller glove size, and fewer years in practice than men surveyed (all p values < 0.0001). Of women reporting, 86.5 %-comparable to men-attribute physical discomfort to laparoscopic operating. Female surgeons are more likely to receive treatment for their hands, which includes the wrist, thumb, and fingers (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.028). When men and women of the same glove size were compared, women with a larger glove size (7-8.5) reported more cases of treatment for their hands than men of the same glove size. (21 vs. 3 %, p = 0.016). Women who wore a size 5.5-6.5 surgical glove reported significantly more cases of discomfort in their shoulder area (neck, shoulder, upper back) than men who wore the same size surgical glove (77 vs. 27 %, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Women surgeons are experiencing more discomfort and treatment in their hands than male surgeons. Redesign of laparoscopic instrument handles and improvements to table height comprise the most promising solutions to these ergonomic challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1051-1055
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Human Engineering
Hand
Surgical Gloves
Operating Rooms
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Thumb
Wrist
Human Body
Surgical Instruments
Fingers
Surgeons
Neck
Therapeutics
Odds Ratio
Demography
Equipment and Supplies
Wounds and Injuries
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Ergonomics
  • Instrument/operating room design
  • Women surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The ergonomics of women in surgery. / Sutton, Erica; Irvin, Myra; Zeigler, Craig; Lee, Gyusung; Park, Adrian.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2014, p. 1051-1055.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sutton, Erica ; Irvin, Myra ; Zeigler, Craig ; Lee, Gyusung ; Park, Adrian. / The ergonomics of women in surgery. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 1051-1055.
@article{d431679896af4333be9c5bb16f737773,
title = "The ergonomics of women in surgery",
abstract = "Background: Among surgeons who regularly perform minimally invasive surgery, as many as 87 {\%} report injuries or symptoms related to job performance. Operating room and instrument design have traditionally favored surgeons who are taller and who possess hands that are, in general, large and strong. We hypothesize that women may be experiencing more ergonomic difficulties than men for whom the operating room and surgical instruments, although uniformly perilous, more traditionally have accommodated. Methods: A 23-item web-based survey was offered via email to 2,000 laparoscopic surgeons and fellows currently practicing. The survey addressed four categories: demographics, physical symptoms, ergonomics, and environment/equipment. Key questions allowed us to identify which body part experienced which symptoms. Results: There was a 15.7 {\%} overall response rate. Among respondents, 17 {\%} (54/314) were female. Women were significantly younger, shorter, had smaller glove size, and fewer years in practice than men surveyed (all p values < 0.0001). Of women reporting, 86.5 {\%}-comparable to men-attribute physical discomfort to laparoscopic operating. Female surgeons are more likely to receive treatment for their hands, which includes the wrist, thumb, and fingers (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.028). When men and women of the same glove size were compared, women with a larger glove size (7-8.5) reported more cases of treatment for their hands than men of the same glove size. (21 vs. 3 {\%}, p = 0.016). Women who wore a size 5.5-6.5 surgical glove reported significantly more cases of discomfort in their shoulder area (neck, shoulder, upper back) than men who wore the same size surgical glove (77 vs. 27 {\%}, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Women surgeons are experiencing more discomfort and treatment in their hands than male surgeons. Redesign of laparoscopic instrument handles and improvements to table height comprise the most promising solutions to these ergonomic challenges.",
keywords = "Ergonomics, Instrument/operating room design, Women surgeons",
author = "Erica Sutton and Myra Irvin and Craig Zeigler and Gyusung Lee and Adrian Park",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-013-3281-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1051--1055",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ergonomics of women in surgery

AU - Sutton, Erica

AU - Irvin, Myra

AU - Zeigler, Craig

AU - Lee, Gyusung

AU - Park, Adrian

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Among surgeons who regularly perform minimally invasive surgery, as many as 87 % report injuries or symptoms related to job performance. Operating room and instrument design have traditionally favored surgeons who are taller and who possess hands that are, in general, large and strong. We hypothesize that women may be experiencing more ergonomic difficulties than men for whom the operating room and surgical instruments, although uniformly perilous, more traditionally have accommodated. Methods: A 23-item web-based survey was offered via email to 2,000 laparoscopic surgeons and fellows currently practicing. The survey addressed four categories: demographics, physical symptoms, ergonomics, and environment/equipment. Key questions allowed us to identify which body part experienced which symptoms. Results: There was a 15.7 % overall response rate. Among respondents, 17 % (54/314) were female. Women were significantly younger, shorter, had smaller glove size, and fewer years in practice than men surveyed (all p values < 0.0001). Of women reporting, 86.5 %-comparable to men-attribute physical discomfort to laparoscopic operating. Female surgeons are more likely to receive treatment for their hands, which includes the wrist, thumb, and fingers (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.028). When men and women of the same glove size were compared, women with a larger glove size (7-8.5) reported more cases of treatment for their hands than men of the same glove size. (21 vs. 3 %, p = 0.016). Women who wore a size 5.5-6.5 surgical glove reported significantly more cases of discomfort in their shoulder area (neck, shoulder, upper back) than men who wore the same size surgical glove (77 vs. 27 %, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Women surgeons are experiencing more discomfort and treatment in their hands than male surgeons. Redesign of laparoscopic instrument handles and improvements to table height comprise the most promising solutions to these ergonomic challenges.

AB - Background: Among surgeons who regularly perform minimally invasive surgery, as many as 87 % report injuries or symptoms related to job performance. Operating room and instrument design have traditionally favored surgeons who are taller and who possess hands that are, in general, large and strong. We hypothesize that women may be experiencing more ergonomic difficulties than men for whom the operating room and surgical instruments, although uniformly perilous, more traditionally have accommodated. Methods: A 23-item web-based survey was offered via email to 2,000 laparoscopic surgeons and fellows currently practicing. The survey addressed four categories: demographics, physical symptoms, ergonomics, and environment/equipment. Key questions allowed us to identify which body part experienced which symptoms. Results: There was a 15.7 % overall response rate. Among respondents, 17 % (54/314) were female. Women were significantly younger, shorter, had smaller glove size, and fewer years in practice than men surveyed (all p values < 0.0001). Of women reporting, 86.5 %-comparable to men-attribute physical discomfort to laparoscopic operating. Female surgeons are more likely to receive treatment for their hands, which includes the wrist, thumb, and fingers (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.028). When men and women of the same glove size were compared, women with a larger glove size (7-8.5) reported more cases of treatment for their hands than men of the same glove size. (21 vs. 3 %, p = 0.016). Women who wore a size 5.5-6.5 surgical glove reported significantly more cases of discomfort in their shoulder area (neck, shoulder, upper back) than men who wore the same size surgical glove (77 vs. 27 %, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Women surgeons are experiencing more discomfort and treatment in their hands than male surgeons. Redesign of laparoscopic instrument handles and improvements to table height comprise the most promising solutions to these ergonomic challenges.

KW - Ergonomics

KW - Instrument/operating room design

KW - Women surgeons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899491349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899491349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-013-3281-0

DO - 10.1007/s00464-013-3281-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 24232047

AN - SCOPUS:84899491349

VL - 28

SP - 1051

EP - 1055

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 4

ER -