The effects of alternative study designs on the power of community randomized trials: Evidence from three studies of human immunodeficiency virus prevention in East Africa

Jim Todd, Lucy Carpenter, Xianbin Li, Jessica Nakiyingi, Ronald H Gray, Richard Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Randomized intervention trials in which the community is the unit of randomization are increasingly being used to evaluate the impact of public health interventions. In the design of community randomized trials (CRT), the power of the study is likely to be affected by two issues: the matching or stratification of communities, and the number and size of the communities to be randomized. Methods. Data from three East African community intervention trials, designed to evaluate the impact of interventions to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence, are used to compare the efficiency of different trial designs. Results. Compared with an unmatched design, stratification reduced the between-community variation in the Mwanza trial (from 0.51 to 0.24) and in the Masaka trial (from 0.38 to 0.28). The reduction was smaller in the Rakai trial where the selected communities were more homogeneous (from 0.15 to 0.11). For all trials, individual matching of communities produced estimates of between-community variation similar to those from the stratified designs. The linear association between HIV prevalence and incidence was strong in the Mwanza trial (correlation coefficient R = 0.83) and the Masaka trial (R = 0.83), but weak in the Rakai trial (R = 0.28). Unmatched study designs that use smaller communities tend to increase between-community variation, but reduce the design effect and improve study power. Conclusions. These empirical data suggest that selection of homogeneous communities, or stratification of communities prior to randomization, may improve the power of CRT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)755-762
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Fingerprint

Eastern Africa
HIV
Random Allocation
Incidence

Keywords

  • Between-community variance
  • Community-randomized
  • HIV
  • Intervention studies
  • Matching
  • Power
  • Sample size
  • Stratification
  • Study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

The effects of alternative study designs on the power of community randomized trials : Evidence from three studies of human immunodeficiency virus prevention in East Africa. / Todd, Jim; Carpenter, Lucy; Li, Xianbin; Nakiyingi, Jessica; Gray, Ronald H; Hayes, Richard.

In: International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 10.2003, p. 755-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{30fb4b0f74654ae9b05ed03d66362c92,
title = "The effects of alternative study designs on the power of community randomized trials: Evidence from three studies of human immunodeficiency virus prevention in East Africa",
abstract = "Background. Randomized intervention trials in which the community is the unit of randomization are increasingly being used to evaluate the impact of public health interventions. In the design of community randomized trials (CRT), the power of the study is likely to be affected by two issues: the matching or stratification of communities, and the number and size of the communities to be randomized. Methods. Data from three East African community intervention trials, designed to evaluate the impact of interventions to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence, are used to compare the efficiency of different trial designs. Results. Compared with an unmatched design, stratification reduced the between-community variation in the Mwanza trial (from 0.51 to 0.24) and in the Masaka trial (from 0.38 to 0.28). The reduction was smaller in the Rakai trial where the selected communities were more homogeneous (from 0.15 to 0.11). For all trials, individual matching of communities produced estimates of between-community variation similar to those from the stratified designs. The linear association between HIV prevalence and incidence was strong in the Mwanza trial (correlation coefficient R = 0.83) and the Masaka trial (R = 0.83), but weak in the Rakai trial (R = 0.28). Unmatched study designs that use smaller communities tend to increase between-community variation, but reduce the design effect and improve study power. Conclusions. These empirical data suggest that selection of homogeneous communities, or stratification of communities prior to randomization, may improve the power of CRT.",
keywords = "Between-community variance, Community-randomized, HIV, Intervention studies, Matching, Power, Sample size, Stratification, Study design",
author = "Jim Todd and Lucy Carpenter and Xianbin Li and Jessica Nakiyingi and Gray, {Ronald H} and Richard Hayes",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/ije/dyg150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "755--762",
journal = "International Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0300-5771",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of alternative study designs on the power of community randomized trials

T2 - Evidence from three studies of human immunodeficiency virus prevention in East Africa

AU - Todd, Jim

AU - Carpenter, Lucy

AU - Li, Xianbin

AU - Nakiyingi, Jessica

AU - Gray, Ronald H

AU - Hayes, Richard

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Background. Randomized intervention trials in which the community is the unit of randomization are increasingly being used to evaluate the impact of public health interventions. In the design of community randomized trials (CRT), the power of the study is likely to be affected by two issues: the matching or stratification of communities, and the number and size of the communities to be randomized. Methods. Data from three East African community intervention trials, designed to evaluate the impact of interventions to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence, are used to compare the efficiency of different trial designs. Results. Compared with an unmatched design, stratification reduced the between-community variation in the Mwanza trial (from 0.51 to 0.24) and in the Masaka trial (from 0.38 to 0.28). The reduction was smaller in the Rakai trial where the selected communities were more homogeneous (from 0.15 to 0.11). For all trials, individual matching of communities produced estimates of between-community variation similar to those from the stratified designs. The linear association between HIV prevalence and incidence was strong in the Mwanza trial (correlation coefficient R = 0.83) and the Masaka trial (R = 0.83), but weak in the Rakai trial (R = 0.28). Unmatched study designs that use smaller communities tend to increase between-community variation, but reduce the design effect and improve study power. Conclusions. These empirical data suggest that selection of homogeneous communities, or stratification of communities prior to randomization, may improve the power of CRT.

AB - Background. Randomized intervention trials in which the community is the unit of randomization are increasingly being used to evaluate the impact of public health interventions. In the design of community randomized trials (CRT), the power of the study is likely to be affected by two issues: the matching or stratification of communities, and the number and size of the communities to be randomized. Methods. Data from three East African community intervention trials, designed to evaluate the impact of interventions to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence, are used to compare the efficiency of different trial designs. Results. Compared with an unmatched design, stratification reduced the between-community variation in the Mwanza trial (from 0.51 to 0.24) and in the Masaka trial (from 0.38 to 0.28). The reduction was smaller in the Rakai trial where the selected communities were more homogeneous (from 0.15 to 0.11). For all trials, individual matching of communities produced estimates of between-community variation similar to those from the stratified designs. The linear association between HIV prevalence and incidence was strong in the Mwanza trial (correlation coefficient R = 0.83) and the Masaka trial (R = 0.83), but weak in the Rakai trial (R = 0.28). Unmatched study designs that use smaller communities tend to increase between-community variation, but reduce the design effect and improve study power. Conclusions. These empirical data suggest that selection of homogeneous communities, or stratification of communities prior to randomization, may improve the power of CRT.

KW - Between-community variance

KW - Community-randomized

KW - HIV

KW - Intervention studies

KW - Matching

KW - Power

KW - Sample size

KW - Stratification

KW - Study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142185439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142185439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyg150

DO - 10.1093/ije/dyg150

M3 - Article

C2 - 14559745

AN - SCOPUS:0142185439

VL - 32

SP - 755

EP - 762

JO - International Journal of Epidemiology

JF - International Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0300-5771

IS - 5

ER -