The effect of relative spectacle magnification on aniseikonia.

L. R. Achiron, N. S. Witkin, Ann Margret Ervin, G. Broocker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to study the effects of modifying relative spectacle magnification to determine what effect this has on aniseikonia, binocularity, and visual comfort. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 34 aniseikonic patients was undertaken. The etiology of aniseikonia varied from physiologically occurring to induced. Aniseikonic screening included manifest refraction, keratometry, axial length, Randot stereoacuity, associated phoria, and Keystone space eikonometry. A modified pair of spectacles was fabricated on the basis of magnification principles for iseikonic lenses. Each patient was also given a control pair of conventional spectacles. A 4-week trial period was allowed for each pair of spectacles, pertinent examination measurements were repeated, and a patient survey was administered. Data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square. RESULTS: Modifying relative spectacle magnification reduced mean aniseikonic error by 1.06% (P <0.0001). A difference was found between the control and modified spectacles for subjective reports of visual comfort, performance, and eye-strain (P <0.05). There was no difference between the two groups for stereoacuity or cosmetic appearance of lenses. At the conclusion of the study, 93% of patients preferred the modified lenses in direct comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that modification of lens designs to equalize relative spectacle magnification reduces aniseikonia and improves subjective comfort and performance of anisometropic spectacles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-599
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Optometric Association
Volume69
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aniseikonia
Lenses
Strabismus
Chi-Square Distribution
Cosmetics

Cite this

The effect of relative spectacle magnification on aniseikonia. / Achiron, L. R.; Witkin, N. S.; Ervin, Ann Margret; Broocker, G.

In: Journal of the American Optometric Association, Vol. 69, No. 9, 1998, p. 591-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Achiron, L. R. ; Witkin, N. S. ; Ervin, Ann Margret ; Broocker, G. / The effect of relative spectacle magnification on aniseikonia. In: Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1998 ; Vol. 69, No. 9. pp. 591-599.
@article{d840f03cb7a64024952b2712e37675f0,
title = "The effect of relative spectacle magnification on aniseikonia.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to study the effects of modifying relative spectacle magnification to determine what effect this has on aniseikonia, binocularity, and visual comfort. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 34 aniseikonic patients was undertaken. The etiology of aniseikonia varied from physiologically occurring to induced. Aniseikonic screening included manifest refraction, keratometry, axial length, Randot stereoacuity, associated phoria, and Keystone space eikonometry. A modified pair of spectacles was fabricated on the basis of magnification principles for iseikonic lenses. Each patient was also given a control pair of conventional spectacles. A 4-week trial period was allowed for each pair of spectacles, pertinent examination measurements were repeated, and a patient survey was administered. Data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square. RESULTS: Modifying relative spectacle magnification reduced mean aniseikonic error by 1.06{\%} (P <0.0001). A difference was found between the control and modified spectacles for subjective reports of visual comfort, performance, and eye-strain (P <0.05). There was no difference between the two groups for stereoacuity or cosmetic appearance of lenses. At the conclusion of the study, 93{\%} of patients preferred the modified lenses in direct comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that modification of lens designs to equalize relative spectacle magnification reduces aniseikonia and improves subjective comfort and performance of anisometropic spectacles.",
author = "Achiron, {L. R.} and Witkin, {N. S.} and Ervin, {Ann Margret} and G. Broocker",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "591--599",
journal = "Journal of the American Optometric Association",
issn = "0003-0244",
publisher = "American Optometric Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of relative spectacle magnification on aniseikonia.

AU - Achiron, L. R.

AU - Witkin, N. S.

AU - Ervin, Ann Margret

AU - Broocker, G.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to study the effects of modifying relative spectacle magnification to determine what effect this has on aniseikonia, binocularity, and visual comfort. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 34 aniseikonic patients was undertaken. The etiology of aniseikonia varied from physiologically occurring to induced. Aniseikonic screening included manifest refraction, keratometry, axial length, Randot stereoacuity, associated phoria, and Keystone space eikonometry. A modified pair of spectacles was fabricated on the basis of magnification principles for iseikonic lenses. Each patient was also given a control pair of conventional spectacles. A 4-week trial period was allowed for each pair of spectacles, pertinent examination measurements were repeated, and a patient survey was administered. Data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square. RESULTS: Modifying relative spectacle magnification reduced mean aniseikonic error by 1.06% (P <0.0001). A difference was found between the control and modified spectacles for subjective reports of visual comfort, performance, and eye-strain (P <0.05). There was no difference between the two groups for stereoacuity or cosmetic appearance of lenses. At the conclusion of the study, 93% of patients preferred the modified lenses in direct comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that modification of lens designs to equalize relative spectacle magnification reduces aniseikonia and improves subjective comfort and performance of anisometropic spectacles.

AB - PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to study the effects of modifying relative spectacle magnification to determine what effect this has on aniseikonia, binocularity, and visual comfort. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 34 aniseikonic patients was undertaken. The etiology of aniseikonia varied from physiologically occurring to induced. Aniseikonic screening included manifest refraction, keratometry, axial length, Randot stereoacuity, associated phoria, and Keystone space eikonometry. A modified pair of spectacles was fabricated on the basis of magnification principles for iseikonic lenses. Each patient was also given a control pair of conventional spectacles. A 4-week trial period was allowed for each pair of spectacles, pertinent examination measurements were repeated, and a patient survey was administered. Data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square. RESULTS: Modifying relative spectacle magnification reduced mean aniseikonic error by 1.06% (P <0.0001). A difference was found between the control and modified spectacles for subjective reports of visual comfort, performance, and eye-strain (P <0.05). There was no difference between the two groups for stereoacuity or cosmetic appearance of lenses. At the conclusion of the study, 93% of patients preferred the modified lenses in direct comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that modification of lens designs to equalize relative spectacle magnification reduces aniseikonia and improves subjective comfort and performance of anisometropic spectacles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032159456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032159456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9785734

AN - SCOPUS:0032159456

VL - 69

SP - 591

EP - 599

JO - Journal of the American Optometric Association

JF - Journal of the American Optometric Association

SN - 0003-0244

IS - 9

ER -