The effect of race and gender on the surgical management of the small renal mass

Max Kates, Michael J. Whalen, Gina M. Badalato, James M. McKiernan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: To date, no population studies have been designed to assess the impact of race and gender on the rate of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) across the United States. Materials and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated over the most recent decade, 1998-2007. Baseline socio-demographic data were compared between Caucasian and African-American patients using χ2 and t-test analysis, and rates of radical nephrectomy (RN) were compared for all permutations of race and gender. A multivariate logistic regression model was in turn created with these variables to predict the odds of undergoing a radical nephrectomy. No prior assumptions were made regarding superiority of partial nephrectomy (PN) over RN as a therapeutic intervention. Results: A total of 14,953 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study, and of these, 1,804 (12%) were African-American. Comparably, African-American patients were younger (<50 years; 23 vs. 28%, P < 0.001), and had an increased rate of high grade disease (13 vs. 16%, P < 0.001). Among different subsets of race and gender, African-American women received PN least often (28%) compared with all other groups, with African-American women at a 47% increased risk of undergoing RN compared with Caucasian male counterparts (95% CI: 1.24-1.73). Conclusions: Significant racial and gender disparities exist with regard to utilization of nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses, particularly in African-American women. Further efforts should be directed to elucidating and addressing the rationale behind this disparity to ensure the uniformity of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1794-1799
Number of pages6
JournalUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
African Americans
Kidney
Nephrons
Logistic Models
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Registries
Epidemiology
Demography
Population

Keywords

  • Nephrectomy
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • SEER program

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Urology

Cite this

The effect of race and gender on the surgical management of the small renal mass. / Kates, Max; Whalen, Michael J.; Badalato, Gina M.; McKiernan, James M.

In: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, Vol. 31, No. 8, 01.11.2013, p. 1794-1799.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kates, Max ; Whalen, Michael J. ; Badalato, Gina M. ; McKiernan, James M. / The effect of race and gender on the surgical management of the small renal mass. In: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2013 ; Vol. 31, No. 8. pp. 1794-1799.
@article{26e4081039514331b39d96730dd3785b,
title = "The effect of race and gender on the surgical management of the small renal mass",
abstract = "Background: To date, no population studies have been designed to assess the impact of race and gender on the rate of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) across the United States. Materials and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated over the most recent decade, 1998-2007. Baseline socio-demographic data were compared between Caucasian and African-American patients using χ2 and t-test analysis, and rates of radical nephrectomy (RN) were compared for all permutations of race and gender. A multivariate logistic regression model was in turn created with these variables to predict the odds of undergoing a radical nephrectomy. No prior assumptions were made regarding superiority of partial nephrectomy (PN) over RN as a therapeutic intervention. Results: A total of 14,953 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study, and of these, 1,804 (12{\%}) were African-American. Comparably, African-American patients were younger (<50 years; 23 vs. 28{\%}, P < 0.001), and had an increased rate of high grade disease (13 vs. 16{\%}, P < 0.001). Among different subsets of race and gender, African-American women received PN least often (28{\%}) compared with all other groups, with African-American women at a 47{\%} increased risk of undergoing RN compared with Caucasian male counterparts (95{\%} CI: 1.24-1.73). Conclusions: Significant racial and gender disparities exist with regard to utilization of nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses, particularly in African-American women. Further efforts should be directed to elucidating and addressing the rationale behind this disparity to ensure the uniformity of care.",
keywords = "Nephrectomy, Renal cell carcinoma, SEER program",
author = "Max Kates and Whalen, {Michael J.} and Badalato, {Gina M.} and McKiernan, {James M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1794--1799",
journal = "Urologic Oncology",
issn = "1078-1439",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of race and gender on the surgical management of the small renal mass

AU - Kates, Max

AU - Whalen, Michael J.

AU - Badalato, Gina M.

AU - McKiernan, James M.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Background: To date, no population studies have been designed to assess the impact of race and gender on the rate of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) across the United States. Materials and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated over the most recent decade, 1998-2007. Baseline socio-demographic data were compared between Caucasian and African-American patients using χ2 and t-test analysis, and rates of radical nephrectomy (RN) were compared for all permutations of race and gender. A multivariate logistic regression model was in turn created with these variables to predict the odds of undergoing a radical nephrectomy. No prior assumptions were made regarding superiority of partial nephrectomy (PN) over RN as a therapeutic intervention. Results: A total of 14,953 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study, and of these, 1,804 (12%) were African-American. Comparably, African-American patients were younger (<50 years; 23 vs. 28%, P < 0.001), and had an increased rate of high grade disease (13 vs. 16%, P < 0.001). Among different subsets of race and gender, African-American women received PN least often (28%) compared with all other groups, with African-American women at a 47% increased risk of undergoing RN compared with Caucasian male counterparts (95% CI: 1.24-1.73). Conclusions: Significant racial and gender disparities exist with regard to utilization of nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses, particularly in African-American women. Further efforts should be directed to elucidating and addressing the rationale behind this disparity to ensure the uniformity of care.

AB - Background: To date, no population studies have been designed to assess the impact of race and gender on the rate of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) across the United States. Materials and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated over the most recent decade, 1998-2007. Baseline socio-demographic data were compared between Caucasian and African-American patients using χ2 and t-test analysis, and rates of radical nephrectomy (RN) were compared for all permutations of race and gender. A multivariate logistic regression model was in turn created with these variables to predict the odds of undergoing a radical nephrectomy. No prior assumptions were made regarding superiority of partial nephrectomy (PN) over RN as a therapeutic intervention. Results: A total of 14,953 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study, and of these, 1,804 (12%) were African-American. Comparably, African-American patients were younger (<50 years; 23 vs. 28%, P < 0.001), and had an increased rate of high grade disease (13 vs. 16%, P < 0.001). Among different subsets of race and gender, African-American women received PN least often (28%) compared with all other groups, with African-American women at a 47% increased risk of undergoing RN compared with Caucasian male counterparts (95% CI: 1.24-1.73). Conclusions: Significant racial and gender disparities exist with regard to utilization of nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses, particularly in African-American women. Further efforts should be directed to elucidating and addressing the rationale behind this disparity to ensure the uniformity of care.

KW - Nephrectomy

KW - Renal cell carcinoma

KW - SEER program

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886307550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886307550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1794

EP - 1799

JO - Urologic Oncology

JF - Urologic Oncology

SN - 1078-1439

IS - 8

ER -