The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS

Albert W Wu, D. L. Jacobson, R. A. Berzon, D. A. Revicki, C. Van Der Horst, C. J. Fichtenbaum, M. S. Saag, L. Lynn, D. Hardy, J. Feinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Brief measures of health-related quality of life are being used with increased frequency in AIDS clinical trials. Self-administration of questionnaires can reduce costs in this setting because they require little time. However, the equivalence between self- and interview-administered responses in clinical trials is not known. We evaluated patient and proxy responses to the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the EuroQol. We randomized 68 patients with advanced HIV disease on (1) mode of administration (self vs. interview); (2) type of interview (face-to-face vs. telephone); (3) questionnaire order (MOS-first vs. EuroQol-first); and (4) 2- vs. 3-item response categories for physical limitations. There were few differences in scores between self and interview administration and type of interview. Proxy respondents viewed patients as more impaired than did patients themselves on subjective aspects of health including mental health (63.8 vs. 75.7, p <0.001), health distress (67.3 vs. 77.1, p = 0.007), pain (64.4 vs. 70.0, p = 0.04), and vitality (48.4 vs. 55.5, p = 0.04). Results concerning questionnaire order and number of response categories were not conclusive. Our results suggest that for patients with advanced HIV disease, data from the MOS-HIV and the EuroQol collected using different modes may be pooled, but that proxy responses should be calibrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-10
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews
Proxy
HIV
Health
Ego
Health Surveys
Clinical Trials
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Self Administration
Telephone
Mental Health
Quality of Life
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pain
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • EuroQol
  • health status
  • HIV
  • mode of administration
  • MOS-HIV
  • quality of life
  • survey research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Wu, A. W., Jacobson, D. L., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., Van Der Horst, C., Fichtenbaum, C. J., ... Feinberg, J. (1997). The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. Quality of Life Research, 6(1), 3-10.

The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. / Wu, Albert W; Jacobson, D. L.; Berzon, R. A.; Revicki, D. A.; Van Der Horst, C.; Fichtenbaum, C. J.; Saag, M. S.; Lynn, L.; Hardy, D.; Feinberg, J.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1997, p. 3-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, AW, Jacobson, DL, Berzon, RA, Revicki, DA, Van Der Horst, C, Fichtenbaum, CJ, Saag, MS, Lynn, L, Hardy, D & Feinberg, J 1997, 'The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS', Quality of Life Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3-10.
Wu AW, Jacobson DL, Berzon RA, Revicki DA, Van Der Horst C, Fichtenbaum CJ et al. The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. Quality of Life Research. 1997;6(1):3-10.
Wu, Albert W ; Jacobson, D. L. ; Berzon, R. A. ; Revicki, D. A. ; Van Der Horst, C. ; Fichtenbaum, C. J. ; Saag, M. S. ; Lynn, L. ; Hardy, D. ; Feinberg, J. / The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. In: Quality of Life Research. 1997 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 3-10.
@article{eb8d5d87139a42d98221f30d6fc9c88f,
title = "The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS",
abstract = "Brief measures of health-related quality of life are being used with increased frequency in AIDS clinical trials. Self-administration of questionnaires can reduce costs in this setting because they require little time. However, the equivalence between self- and interview-administered responses in clinical trials is not known. We evaluated patient and proxy responses to the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the EuroQol. We randomized 68 patients with advanced HIV disease on (1) mode of administration (self vs. interview); (2) type of interview (face-to-face vs. telephone); (3) questionnaire order (MOS-first vs. EuroQol-first); and (4) 2- vs. 3-item response categories for physical limitations. There were few differences in scores between self and interview administration and type of interview. Proxy respondents viewed patients as more impaired than did patients themselves on subjective aspects of health including mental health (63.8 vs. 75.7, p <0.001), health distress (67.3 vs. 77.1, p = 0.007), pain (64.4 vs. 70.0, p = 0.04), and vitality (48.4 vs. 55.5, p = 0.04). Results concerning questionnaire order and number of response categories were not conclusive. Our results suggest that for patients with advanced HIV disease, data from the MOS-HIV and the EuroQol collected using different modes may be pooled, but that proxy responses should be calibrated.",
keywords = "EuroQol, health status, HIV, mode of administration, MOS-HIV, quality of life, survey research methods",
author = "Wu, {Albert W} and Jacobson, {D. L.} and Berzon, {R. A.} and Revicki, {D. A.} and {Van Der Horst}, C. and Fichtenbaum, {C. J.} and Saag, {M. S.} and L. Lynn and D. Hardy and J. Feinberg",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "3--10",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS

AU - Wu, Albert W

AU - Jacobson, D. L.

AU - Berzon, R. A.

AU - Revicki, D. A.

AU - Van Der Horst, C.

AU - Fichtenbaum, C. J.

AU - Saag, M. S.

AU - Lynn, L.

AU - Hardy, D.

AU - Feinberg, J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Brief measures of health-related quality of life are being used with increased frequency in AIDS clinical trials. Self-administration of questionnaires can reduce costs in this setting because they require little time. However, the equivalence between self- and interview-administered responses in clinical trials is not known. We evaluated patient and proxy responses to the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the EuroQol. We randomized 68 patients with advanced HIV disease on (1) mode of administration (self vs. interview); (2) type of interview (face-to-face vs. telephone); (3) questionnaire order (MOS-first vs. EuroQol-first); and (4) 2- vs. 3-item response categories for physical limitations. There were few differences in scores between self and interview administration and type of interview. Proxy respondents viewed patients as more impaired than did patients themselves on subjective aspects of health including mental health (63.8 vs. 75.7, p <0.001), health distress (67.3 vs. 77.1, p = 0.007), pain (64.4 vs. 70.0, p = 0.04), and vitality (48.4 vs. 55.5, p = 0.04). Results concerning questionnaire order and number of response categories were not conclusive. Our results suggest that for patients with advanced HIV disease, data from the MOS-HIV and the EuroQol collected using different modes may be pooled, but that proxy responses should be calibrated.

AB - Brief measures of health-related quality of life are being used with increased frequency in AIDS clinical trials. Self-administration of questionnaires can reduce costs in this setting because they require little time. However, the equivalence between self- and interview-administered responses in clinical trials is not known. We evaluated patient and proxy responses to the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the EuroQol. We randomized 68 patients with advanced HIV disease on (1) mode of administration (self vs. interview); (2) type of interview (face-to-face vs. telephone); (3) questionnaire order (MOS-first vs. EuroQol-first); and (4) 2- vs. 3-item response categories for physical limitations. There were few differences in scores between self and interview administration and type of interview. Proxy respondents viewed patients as more impaired than did patients themselves on subjective aspects of health including mental health (63.8 vs. 75.7, p <0.001), health distress (67.3 vs. 77.1, p = 0.007), pain (64.4 vs. 70.0, p = 0.04), and vitality (48.4 vs. 55.5, p = 0.04). Results concerning questionnaire order and number of response categories were not conclusive. Our results suggest that for patients with advanced HIV disease, data from the MOS-HIV and the EuroQol collected using different modes may be pooled, but that proxy responses should be calibrated.

KW - EuroQol

KW - health status

KW - HIV

KW - mode of administration

KW - MOS-HIV

KW - quality of life

KW - survey research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8044227210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8044227210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9062436

AN - SCOPUS:8044227210

VL - 6

SP - 3

EP - 10

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 1

ER -