The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on coronary blood flow velocity distal to coronary artery stenoses

R. David Anderson, Paul A. Gurbel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the accepted clinical benefit of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC), the physiologic explanation for its benefit remains controversial. Indirect methods of measuring coronary blood flow during IABC in obstructive coronary disease have yielded conflicting results. The direct measurement of coronary blood flow velocity distal to sites of stenoses by methods that do not potentially impede flow has not been previously reported. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of IABC on coronary blood flow velocity distal to a coronary stenosis by employing a method that would not impede flow through the stenosis. In an open-chest canine model, phasic and mean left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocities distal to varying degrees of stenosis were continuously measured by an epicardial Doppler probe with and without counterpulsation. All hemodynamic parameters were recorded in the absence of stenosis (n = 5) and the presence of subcritical (n = 5) and critical stenoses (n = 5). Heart rate was not affected by counterpulsation. Systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product declined at all times with IABC. Compared to baseline, peak aortic diastolic pressure was augmented by an average of 24 mm Hg during IABC (p <0.05). However, mean coronary artery flow velocities remained unchanged (101, 103 and 98% of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical stenosis and critical stenosis, respectively; p > 0.05 compared to baseline). Peak diastolic flow velocities were 106, 102 and 96% of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical and critical stenoses, respectively (p > 0.05). Despite the augmentation of peak diastolic pressure, distal coronary blood flow velocity was not increased by IABC in this canine model, irrespective of the severity of proximal coronary stenosis. These data suggest that augmentation of coronary artery flow distal to sites of stenoses is not primarily responsible for the clinical benefit observed when IABC is used in the setting of obstructive coronary artery disease. The reduction in afterload and myocardial oxygen demand observed in this model agrees with previous studies and likely accounts, at least in part, for the positive clinical results with IABC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)306-312
Number of pages7
JournalCardiology
Volume87
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jun 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Counterpulsation
Blood Flow Velocity
Coronary Stenosis
Pathologic Constriction
Blood Pressure
Canidae
Coronary Vessels
Coronary Disease
Coronary Artery Disease
Arterial Pressure
Thorax
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics
Oxygen

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Coronary blood flow
  • Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on coronary blood flow velocity distal to coronary artery stenoses. / Anderson, R. David; Gurbel, Paul A.

In: Cardiology, Vol. 87, No. 4, 06.1996, p. 306-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc46cb1030584737b927b38934b8bb96,
title = "The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on coronary blood flow velocity distal to coronary artery stenoses",
abstract = "Despite the accepted clinical benefit of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC), the physiologic explanation for its benefit remains controversial. Indirect methods of measuring coronary blood flow during IABC in obstructive coronary disease have yielded conflicting results. The direct measurement of coronary blood flow velocity distal to sites of stenoses by methods that do not potentially impede flow has not been previously reported. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of IABC on coronary blood flow velocity distal to a coronary stenosis by employing a method that would not impede flow through the stenosis. In an open-chest canine model, phasic and mean left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocities distal to varying degrees of stenosis were continuously measured by an epicardial Doppler probe with and without counterpulsation. All hemodynamic parameters were recorded in the absence of stenosis (n = 5) and the presence of subcritical (n = 5) and critical stenoses (n = 5). Heart rate was not affected by counterpulsation. Systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product declined at all times with IABC. Compared to baseline, peak aortic diastolic pressure was augmented by an average of 24 mm Hg during IABC (p <0.05). However, mean coronary artery flow velocities remained unchanged (101, 103 and 98{\%} of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical stenosis and critical stenosis, respectively; p > 0.05 compared to baseline). Peak diastolic flow velocities were 106, 102 and 96{\%} of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical and critical stenoses, respectively (p > 0.05). Despite the augmentation of peak diastolic pressure, distal coronary blood flow velocity was not increased by IABC in this canine model, irrespective of the severity of proximal coronary stenosis. These data suggest that augmentation of coronary artery flow distal to sites of stenoses is not primarily responsible for the clinical benefit observed when IABC is used in the setting of obstructive coronary artery disease. The reduction in afterload and myocardial oxygen demand observed in this model agrees with previous studies and likely accounts, at least in part, for the positive clinical results with IABC.",
keywords = "Coronary artery disease, Coronary blood flow, Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation",
author = "Anderson, {R. David} and Gurbel, {Paul A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "306--312",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine",
issn = "1558-2027",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on coronary blood flow velocity distal to coronary artery stenoses

AU - Anderson, R. David

AU - Gurbel, Paul A.

PY - 1996/6

Y1 - 1996/6

N2 - Despite the accepted clinical benefit of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC), the physiologic explanation for its benefit remains controversial. Indirect methods of measuring coronary blood flow during IABC in obstructive coronary disease have yielded conflicting results. The direct measurement of coronary blood flow velocity distal to sites of stenoses by methods that do not potentially impede flow has not been previously reported. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of IABC on coronary blood flow velocity distal to a coronary stenosis by employing a method that would not impede flow through the stenosis. In an open-chest canine model, phasic and mean left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocities distal to varying degrees of stenosis were continuously measured by an epicardial Doppler probe with and without counterpulsation. All hemodynamic parameters were recorded in the absence of stenosis (n = 5) and the presence of subcritical (n = 5) and critical stenoses (n = 5). Heart rate was not affected by counterpulsation. Systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product declined at all times with IABC. Compared to baseline, peak aortic diastolic pressure was augmented by an average of 24 mm Hg during IABC (p <0.05). However, mean coronary artery flow velocities remained unchanged (101, 103 and 98% of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical stenosis and critical stenosis, respectively; p > 0.05 compared to baseline). Peak diastolic flow velocities were 106, 102 and 96% of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical and critical stenoses, respectively (p > 0.05). Despite the augmentation of peak diastolic pressure, distal coronary blood flow velocity was not increased by IABC in this canine model, irrespective of the severity of proximal coronary stenosis. These data suggest that augmentation of coronary artery flow distal to sites of stenoses is not primarily responsible for the clinical benefit observed when IABC is used in the setting of obstructive coronary artery disease. The reduction in afterload and myocardial oxygen demand observed in this model agrees with previous studies and likely accounts, at least in part, for the positive clinical results with IABC.

AB - Despite the accepted clinical benefit of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC), the physiologic explanation for its benefit remains controversial. Indirect methods of measuring coronary blood flow during IABC in obstructive coronary disease have yielded conflicting results. The direct measurement of coronary blood flow velocity distal to sites of stenoses by methods that do not potentially impede flow has not been previously reported. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of IABC on coronary blood flow velocity distal to a coronary stenosis by employing a method that would not impede flow through the stenosis. In an open-chest canine model, phasic and mean left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocities distal to varying degrees of stenosis were continuously measured by an epicardial Doppler probe with and without counterpulsation. All hemodynamic parameters were recorded in the absence of stenosis (n = 5) and the presence of subcritical (n = 5) and critical stenoses (n = 5). Heart rate was not affected by counterpulsation. Systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product declined at all times with IABC. Compared to baseline, peak aortic diastolic pressure was augmented by an average of 24 mm Hg during IABC (p <0.05). However, mean coronary artery flow velocities remained unchanged (101, 103 and 98% of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical stenosis and critical stenosis, respectively; p > 0.05 compared to baseline). Peak diastolic flow velocities were 106, 102 and 96% of baseline for no stenosis, subcritical and critical stenoses, respectively (p > 0.05). Despite the augmentation of peak diastolic pressure, distal coronary blood flow velocity was not increased by IABC in this canine model, irrespective of the severity of proximal coronary stenosis. These data suggest that augmentation of coronary artery flow distal to sites of stenoses is not primarily responsible for the clinical benefit observed when IABC is used in the setting of obstructive coronary artery disease. The reduction in afterload and myocardial oxygen demand observed in this model agrees with previous studies and likely accounts, at least in part, for the positive clinical results with IABC.

KW - Coronary artery disease

KW - Coronary blood flow

KW - Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029903036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029903036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8793165

AN - SCOPUS:0029903036

VL - 87

SP - 306

EP - 312

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

SN - 1558-2027

IS - 4

ER -