The effect of interview method on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community norms in Botswana

Philip Anglewicz, Diana Gourvenec, Iris Halldorsdottir, Cate O'Kane, Obakeng Koketso, Marelize Gorgens, Toby Kasper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since self-reports of sensitive behaviors play an important role in HIV/AIDS research, the accuracy of these measures has often been examined. In this paper we (1) examine the effect of three survey interview methods on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community sexual norms in Botswana, and (2) introduce an interview method to research on self-reported sexual behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparing across these three survey methods (face-to-face, ballot box, and randomized response), we find that ballot box and randomized response surveys both provide higher reports of sensitive behaviors; the results for randomized response are particularly strong. Within these overall patterns, however, there is variation by question type; additionally the effect of interview method differs by sex. We also examine interviewer effects to gain insight into the effectiveness of these interview methods, and our results suggest that caution be used when interpreting the differences between survey methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)674-687
Number of pages14
JournalAIDS and behavior
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Botswana
Sexual Behavior
Interviews
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Africa South of the Sahara
Research
Self Report
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HIV
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Multiple concurrent partnerships
  • Reporting biases
  • Sexual behavior
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Survey methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

The effect of interview method on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community norms in Botswana. / Anglewicz, Philip; Gourvenec, Diana; Halldorsdottir, Iris; O'Kane, Cate; Koketso, Obakeng; Gorgens, Marelize; Kasper, Toby.

In: AIDS and behavior, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 674-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anglewicz, P, Gourvenec, D, Halldorsdottir, I, O'Kane, C, Koketso, O, Gorgens, M & Kasper, T 2013, 'The effect of interview method on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community norms in Botswana', AIDS and behavior, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 674-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0224-z
Anglewicz, Philip ; Gourvenec, Diana ; Halldorsdottir, Iris ; O'Kane, Cate ; Koketso, Obakeng ; Gorgens, Marelize ; Kasper, Toby. / The effect of interview method on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community norms in Botswana. In: AIDS and behavior. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 674-687.
@article{4b9b0b1d14094325966f8d5fe7501c0d,
title = "The effect of interview method on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community norms in Botswana",
abstract = "Since self-reports of sensitive behaviors play an important role in HIV/AIDS research, the accuracy of these measures has often been examined. In this paper we (1) examine the effect of three survey interview methods on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community sexual norms in Botswana, and (2) introduce an interview method to research on self-reported sexual behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparing across these three survey methods (face-to-face, ballot box, and randomized response), we find that ballot box and randomized response surveys both provide higher reports of sensitive behaviors; the results for randomized response are particularly strong. Within these overall patterns, however, there is variation by question type; additionally the effect of interview method differs by sex. We also examine interviewer effects to gain insight into the effectiveness of these interview methods, and our results suggest that caution be used when interpreting the differences between survey methods.",
keywords = "HIV/AIDS, Multiple concurrent partnerships, Reporting biases, Sexual behavior, Sub-Saharan Africa, Survey methodology",
author = "Philip Anglewicz and Diana Gourvenec and Iris Halldorsdottir and Cate O'Kane and Obakeng Koketso and Marelize Gorgens and Toby Kasper",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10461-012-0224-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "674--687",
journal = "AIDS and Behavior",
issn = "1090-7165",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of interview method on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community norms in Botswana

AU - Anglewicz, Philip

AU - Gourvenec, Diana

AU - Halldorsdottir, Iris

AU - O'Kane, Cate

AU - Koketso, Obakeng

AU - Gorgens, Marelize

AU - Kasper, Toby

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Since self-reports of sensitive behaviors play an important role in HIV/AIDS research, the accuracy of these measures has often been examined. In this paper we (1) examine the effect of three survey interview methods on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community sexual norms in Botswana, and (2) introduce an interview method to research on self-reported sexual behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparing across these three survey methods (face-to-face, ballot box, and randomized response), we find that ballot box and randomized response surveys both provide higher reports of sensitive behaviors; the results for randomized response are particularly strong. Within these overall patterns, however, there is variation by question type; additionally the effect of interview method differs by sex. We also examine interviewer effects to gain insight into the effectiveness of these interview methods, and our results suggest that caution be used when interpreting the differences between survey methods.

AB - Since self-reports of sensitive behaviors play an important role in HIV/AIDS research, the accuracy of these measures has often been examined. In this paper we (1) examine the effect of three survey interview methods on self-reported sexual behavior and perceptions of community sexual norms in Botswana, and (2) introduce an interview method to research on self-reported sexual behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparing across these three survey methods (face-to-face, ballot box, and randomized response), we find that ballot box and randomized response surveys both provide higher reports of sensitive behaviors; the results for randomized response are particularly strong. Within these overall patterns, however, there is variation by question type; additionally the effect of interview method differs by sex. We also examine interviewer effects to gain insight into the effectiveness of these interview methods, and our results suggest that caution be used when interpreting the differences between survey methods.

KW - HIV/AIDS

KW - Multiple concurrent partnerships

KW - Reporting biases

KW - Sexual behavior

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

KW - Survey methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880917117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880917117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10461-012-0224-z

DO - 10.1007/s10461-012-0224-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 22696139

AN - SCOPUS:84880917117

VL - 17

SP - 674

EP - 687

JO - AIDS and Behavior

JF - AIDS and Behavior

SN - 1090-7165

IS - 2

ER -