The effect of HAART on HIV RNA trajectory among treatment-naïve men and women: A segmental bernoulli/lognormal random effects model with left censoring

Haitao Chu, Stephen J. Gange, Xiuhong Li, Donald R. Hoover, Chenglong Liu, Joan S. Chmiel, Lisa P. Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) rapidly suppresses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral replication and reduces circulating viral load, but the long-term effects of HAART on viral load remain unclear. Methods: We evaluated HIV viral load trajectories over 8 years following HAART initiation in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and the Women's Interagency HIV Study. The study included 157 HIV-infected men and 199 HIV-infected women who were antiretroviral naive and contributed 1311 and 1837 semiannual person-visits post-HAART, respectively. To account for within-subject correlation and the high proportion of left-censored viral loads, we used a segmental Bernoulli/lognormal random effects model. Results: Approximately 3 months (0.30 years for men and 0.22 years for women) after HAART initiation, HIV viral loads were optimally suppressed (ie, with very low HIV RNA) for 44% (95% confidence interval = 39%-49%) of men and 43% (38%-47%) of women, whereas the other 56% of men and 57% of women had on average 2.1 (1.5-2.6) and 3.0 (2.7-3.2) log10 copies/mL, respectively. Conclusion: After 8 years on HAART, 75% of men and 80% of women had optimal suppression, whereas the rest of the men and women had suboptimal suppression with a median HIV RNA of 3.1 and 3.7 log10 copies/mL, respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S25-S34
JournalEpidemiology
Volume21
Issue numberSUPPL. 4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of HAART on HIV RNA trajectory among treatment-naïve men and women: A segmental bernoulli/lognormal random effects model with left censoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this