The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Michael Osmanski, Robert J. Dooling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Budgerigars learn their vocalizations by reference to auditory information and they retain the ability to learn new vocalizations throughout life. Auditory feedback of these vocalizations was manipulated in three experiments by training birds to produce vocalizations while wearing small earphones. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of background noise level (Lombard effect) and the effect of manipulating feedback level from self-produced vocalizations (Fletcher effect), respectively. Results show that birds exhibit both a Lombard effect and a Fletcher effect. Further analysis showed that changes in vocal intensity were accompanied by changes in call fundamental frequency and duration. Experiment 3 tested the effect of delaying or altering auditory feedback during vocal production. Results showed subsequent production of incomplete and distorted calls in both feedback conditions. These distortions included changes in the peak fundamental frequency, amplitude, duration, and spectrotemporal structure of calls. Delayed auditory feedback was most disruptive to subsequent calls when the delay was 25 ms. Longer delays resulted in fewer errors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-919
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume126
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Melopsittacus
Birds
birds
earphones
Noise
background noise
Auditory Feedback
education
Vocalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). / Osmanski, Michael; Dooling, Robert J.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 126, No. 2, 08.2009, p. 911-919.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc1be1b8f9b74f488919b88631300ae2,
title = "The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).",
abstract = "Budgerigars learn their vocalizations by reference to auditory information and they retain the ability to learn new vocalizations throughout life. Auditory feedback of these vocalizations was manipulated in three experiments by training birds to produce vocalizations while wearing small earphones. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of background noise level (Lombard effect) and the effect of manipulating feedback level from self-produced vocalizations (Fletcher effect), respectively. Results show that birds exhibit both a Lombard effect and a Fletcher effect. Further analysis showed that changes in vocal intensity were accompanied by changes in call fundamental frequency and duration. Experiment 3 tested the effect of delaying or altering auditory feedback during vocal production. Results showed subsequent production of incomplete and distorted calls in both feedback conditions. These distortions included changes in the peak fundamental frequency, amplitude, duration, and spectrotemporal structure of calls. Delayed auditory feedback was most disruptive to subsequent calls when the delay was 25 ms. Longer delays resulted in fewer errors.",
author = "Michael Osmanski and Dooling, {Robert J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "911--919",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

AU - Osmanski, Michael

AU - Dooling, Robert J.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Budgerigars learn their vocalizations by reference to auditory information and they retain the ability to learn new vocalizations throughout life. Auditory feedback of these vocalizations was manipulated in three experiments by training birds to produce vocalizations while wearing small earphones. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of background noise level (Lombard effect) and the effect of manipulating feedback level from self-produced vocalizations (Fletcher effect), respectively. Results show that birds exhibit both a Lombard effect and a Fletcher effect. Further analysis showed that changes in vocal intensity were accompanied by changes in call fundamental frequency and duration. Experiment 3 tested the effect of delaying or altering auditory feedback during vocal production. Results showed subsequent production of incomplete and distorted calls in both feedback conditions. These distortions included changes in the peak fundamental frequency, amplitude, duration, and spectrotemporal structure of calls. Delayed auditory feedback was most disruptive to subsequent calls when the delay was 25 ms. Longer delays resulted in fewer errors.

AB - Budgerigars learn their vocalizations by reference to auditory information and they retain the ability to learn new vocalizations throughout life. Auditory feedback of these vocalizations was manipulated in three experiments by training birds to produce vocalizations while wearing small earphones. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of background noise level (Lombard effect) and the effect of manipulating feedback level from self-produced vocalizations (Fletcher effect), respectively. Results show that birds exhibit both a Lombard effect and a Fletcher effect. Further analysis showed that changes in vocal intensity were accompanied by changes in call fundamental frequency and duration. Experiment 3 tested the effect of delaying or altering auditory feedback during vocal production. Results showed subsequent production of incomplete and distorted calls in both feedback conditions. These distortions included changes in the peak fundamental frequency, amplitude, duration, and spectrotemporal structure of calls. Delayed auditory feedback was most disruptive to subsequent calls when the delay was 25 ms. Longer delays resulted in fewer errors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349784023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349784023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19640055

AN - SCOPUS:70349784023

VL - 126

SP - 911

EP - 919

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 2

ER -