The economic impact of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

W. Ray Kim, Andrew D. Badley, Russell H. Wiesner, Michael K. Porayko, Eric C. Seaberg, Michael R. Keating, Roger W. Evans, E. Rolland Dickson, Ruud A.F. Krom, Carlos V. Paya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. We studied the economic impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and its effective reduction with antiviral prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients. Method. Analysis of institutional charge data accumulated during a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing oral acyclovir 800 mg four times daily for 120 days (ACV) and intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 days followed by ACV for 106 days (GCV) was performed. Results. Liver transplant recipients who developed CMV disease had significantly higher charges (median: $148,300) than those who developed asymptomatic CMV infection ($119,600) or experienced no CMV infection ($114,100) (P<0.01). A multiple linear regression analysis indicated that CMV disease is associated with a 49% increase in charges, independent of other factors influencing increased hospitalization charges. In CMV-seronegative patients who received a CMV-seropositive donor organ, GCV prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in charges, as compared to ACV prophylaxis ($113,900 vs. $153,300, respectively; P=0.02). Conclusions. CMV disease is an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization associated with liver transplantation. The use of an effective prophylactic antiviral regimen provides savings in health care resources, particularly in patients at high risk for developing CMV disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-361
Number of pages5
JournalTransplantation
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The economic impact of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this