TY - JOUR
T1 - The debate over health care rationing
T2 - Déjà vu all over again?
AU - Cohen Prof., Alan B.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Health care rationing has been a source of contentious debate in the United States for nearly 30 years. Because rationing is bewildering to many Americans, persistent myths about "death panels" and critical health care decisions to be made by faceless bureaucrats abound, instilling fear about health care reform and cost containment measures aimed at slowing spending growth. This paper retrospectively reviews the policy literature on health care rationing over the past quarter century, examines alternative definitions and classification schemes, traces the evolution of the debate, and explores ways in which rationing may be made more rational, transparent, and equitable in the future allocation of scarce health care resources.
AB - Health care rationing has been a source of contentious debate in the United States for nearly 30 years. Because rationing is bewildering to many Americans, persistent myths about "death panels" and critical health care decisions to be made by faceless bureaucrats abound, instilling fear about health care reform and cost containment measures aimed at slowing spending growth. This paper retrospectively reviews the policy literature on health care rationing over the past quarter century, examines alternative definitions and classification schemes, traces the evolution of the debate, and explores ways in which rationing may be made more rational, transparent, and equitable in the future allocation of scarce health care resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866459418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866459418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_49.02.06
DO - 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_49.02.06
M3 - Article
C2 - 22931017
AN - SCOPUS:84866459418
SN - 0046-9580
VL - 49
SP - 90
EP - 100
JO - Inquiry (United States)
JF - Inquiry (United States)
IS - 2
ER -