The cross-cultural generalizability of axis-II constructs: An evaluation of two personality disorder assessment instruments in the People's Republic of China

J. Yang, R. R. McCrae, Paul Costa, S. Yao, X. Dai, T. Cai, B. Gao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined the reliability, cross-instrument validity, and factor stucture of Chinese adaptations of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4+; N = 1,926) and Personality Disorders Interview (PDI-IV; N = 525) in psychiatric patients. Comparisons with data from Western countries suggest that the psychometric properties of these two instruments are comparable across cultures. Low to modest agreement between the PDQ-4+ and PDI-IV was observed for both dimensional and categorical personality disorder evaluations. When the PDI-IV was used as the diagnostic standard, the PDQ-4+ showed higher sensitivity than specificity, and higher negative predictive power than positive predictive power. Factor analyses of both instruments replicated the four-factor structure O'Connor and Dyce (1998) found in Western samples. Results suggested that conceptions and measures of DSM-IV personality disorders are cross-culturally generalizable to Chinese psychiatric populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-263
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality Disorders
Volume14
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Personality Disorders
China
Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Statistical Factor Analysis
Personality
Interviews
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population
propylene diquat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The cross-cultural generalizability of axis-II constructs : An evaluation of two personality disorder assessment instruments in the People's Republic of China. / Yang, J.; McCrae, R. R.; Costa, Paul; Yao, S.; Dai, X.; Cai, T.; Gao, B.

In: Journal of Personality Disorders, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2000, p. 249-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e54b365f6dfa4055b54fe91b5033eff3,
title = "The cross-cultural generalizability of axis-II constructs: An evaluation of two personality disorder assessment instruments in the People's Republic of China",
abstract = "We examined the reliability, cross-instrument validity, and factor stucture of Chinese adaptations of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4+; N = 1,926) and Personality Disorders Interview (PDI-IV; N = 525) in psychiatric patients. Comparisons with data from Western countries suggest that the psychometric properties of these two instruments are comparable across cultures. Low to modest agreement between the PDQ-4+ and PDI-IV was observed for both dimensional and categorical personality disorder evaluations. When the PDI-IV was used as the diagnostic standard, the PDQ-4+ showed higher sensitivity than specificity, and higher negative predictive power than positive predictive power. Factor analyses of both instruments replicated the four-factor structure O'Connor and Dyce (1998) found in Western samples. Results suggested that conceptions and measures of DSM-IV personality disorders are cross-culturally generalizable to Chinese psychiatric populations.",
author = "J. Yang and McCrae, {R. R.} and Paul Costa and S. Yao and X. Dai and T. Cai and B. Gao",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "249--263",
journal = "Journal of Personality Disorders",
issn = "0885-579X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cross-cultural generalizability of axis-II constructs

T2 - An evaluation of two personality disorder assessment instruments in the People's Republic of China

AU - Yang, J.

AU - McCrae, R. R.

AU - Costa, Paul

AU - Yao, S.

AU - Dai, X.

AU - Cai, T.

AU - Gao, B.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - We examined the reliability, cross-instrument validity, and factor stucture of Chinese adaptations of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4+; N = 1,926) and Personality Disorders Interview (PDI-IV; N = 525) in psychiatric patients. Comparisons with data from Western countries suggest that the psychometric properties of these two instruments are comparable across cultures. Low to modest agreement between the PDQ-4+ and PDI-IV was observed for both dimensional and categorical personality disorder evaluations. When the PDI-IV was used as the diagnostic standard, the PDQ-4+ showed higher sensitivity than specificity, and higher negative predictive power than positive predictive power. Factor analyses of both instruments replicated the four-factor structure O'Connor and Dyce (1998) found in Western samples. Results suggested that conceptions and measures of DSM-IV personality disorders are cross-culturally generalizable to Chinese psychiatric populations.

AB - We examined the reliability, cross-instrument validity, and factor stucture of Chinese adaptations of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4+; N = 1,926) and Personality Disorders Interview (PDI-IV; N = 525) in psychiatric patients. Comparisons with data from Western countries suggest that the psychometric properties of these two instruments are comparable across cultures. Low to modest agreement between the PDQ-4+ and PDI-IV was observed for both dimensional and categorical personality disorder evaluations. When the PDI-IV was used as the diagnostic standard, the PDQ-4+ showed higher sensitivity than specificity, and higher negative predictive power than positive predictive power. Factor analyses of both instruments replicated the four-factor structure O'Connor and Dyce (1998) found in Western samples. Results suggested that conceptions and measures of DSM-IV personality disorders are cross-culturally generalizable to Chinese psychiatric populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033806372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033806372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11019748

AN - SCOPUS:0033806372

VL - 14

SP - 249

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Personality Disorders

JF - Journal of Personality Disorders

SN - 0885-579X

IS - 3

ER -