The cost-effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic intervention for individuals with dementia and family caregivers: The tailored activity program

Laura N Gitlin, Nancy Hodgson, Eric Jutkowitz, Laura Pizzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of the Tailored Activity Program (TAP) for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study of a two-group randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients-caregiver dyads randomized to intervention or wait-list control. SETTING: Participants' homes in Philadelphia region. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers were aged ≥21 years, lived with patients, and provided ≥4 hours of daily care. Patients had moderate dementia and behavioral symptoms INTERVENTION: Eight sessions of occupational therapy over 4 months to identify patients' preserved capabilities, previous roles, habits and interests, develop customized activities, and train families in their use. MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) expressed as the cost to bring about one additional unit of benefit measured by caregiver hours per day "doing things" and hours per day "being on duty." Decision tree and Monte Carlo analyses tested robustness of the economic models. RESULTS: Total average intervention cost was $941.63 per day. Intervention caregivers saved one extra hour per day "doing things" at a cost of $2.37/day and one extra hour per day "being on duty" at a cost of $1.10/day. Monte Carlo showed that TAP was cost-effective 79.2% of the time for "doing things" and 79.6% of the time for "being on duty." Varying the cost assumptions did not change cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that investment in TAP is cost-effective and afforded families an important, limited and highly valued resource, needed time off from caregiving. This nonpharmacologic approach should be considered part of the clinical management of dementia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)510-519
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dementia
Costs and Cost Analysis
Economic Models
Behavioral Symptoms
Decision Trees
Occupational Therapy
Habits
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Behavioral symptoms
  • Caregivers
  • Dementia care
  • Quality of life
  • Willingness to pay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

The cost-effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic intervention for individuals with dementia and family caregivers : The tailored activity program. / Gitlin, Laura N; Hodgson, Nancy; Jutkowitz, Eric; Pizzi, Laura.

In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 18, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 510-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0179704bdd82433fa8e6a84671edc155,
title = "The cost-effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic intervention for individuals with dementia and family caregivers: The tailored activity program",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of the Tailored Activity Program (TAP) for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study of a two-group randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients-caregiver dyads randomized to intervention or wait-list control. SETTING: Participants' homes in Philadelphia region. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers were aged ≥21 years, lived with patients, and provided ≥4 hours of daily care. Patients had moderate dementia and behavioral symptoms INTERVENTION: Eight sessions of occupational therapy over 4 months to identify patients' preserved capabilities, previous roles, habits and interests, develop customized activities, and train families in their use. MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) expressed as the cost to bring about one additional unit of benefit measured by caregiver hours per day {"}doing things{"} and hours per day {"}being on duty.{"} Decision tree and Monte Carlo analyses tested robustness of the economic models. RESULTS: Total average intervention cost was $941.63 per day. Intervention caregivers saved one extra hour per day {"}doing things{"} at a cost of $2.37/day and one extra hour per day {"}being on duty{"} at a cost of $1.10/day. Monte Carlo showed that TAP was cost-effective 79.2{\%} of the time for {"}doing things{"} and 79.6{\%} of the time for {"}being on duty.{"} Varying the cost assumptions did not change cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that investment in TAP is cost-effective and afforded families an important, limited and highly valued resource, needed time off from caregiving. This nonpharmacologic approach should be considered part of the clinical management of dementia.",
keywords = "Behavioral symptoms, Caregivers, Dementia care, Quality of life, Willingness to pay",
author = "Gitlin, {Laura N} and Nancy Hodgson and Eric Jutkowitz and Laura Pizzi",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c37d13",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "510--519",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cost-effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic intervention for individuals with dementia and family caregivers

T2 - The tailored activity program

AU - Gitlin, Laura N

AU - Hodgson, Nancy

AU - Jutkowitz, Eric

AU - Pizzi, Laura

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of the Tailored Activity Program (TAP) for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study of a two-group randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients-caregiver dyads randomized to intervention or wait-list control. SETTING: Participants' homes in Philadelphia region. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers were aged ≥21 years, lived with patients, and provided ≥4 hours of daily care. Patients had moderate dementia and behavioral symptoms INTERVENTION: Eight sessions of occupational therapy over 4 months to identify patients' preserved capabilities, previous roles, habits and interests, develop customized activities, and train families in their use. MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) expressed as the cost to bring about one additional unit of benefit measured by caregiver hours per day "doing things" and hours per day "being on duty." Decision tree and Monte Carlo analyses tested robustness of the economic models. RESULTS: Total average intervention cost was $941.63 per day. Intervention caregivers saved one extra hour per day "doing things" at a cost of $2.37/day and one extra hour per day "being on duty" at a cost of $1.10/day. Monte Carlo showed that TAP was cost-effective 79.2% of the time for "doing things" and 79.6% of the time for "being on duty." Varying the cost assumptions did not change cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that investment in TAP is cost-effective and afforded families an important, limited and highly valued resource, needed time off from caregiving. This nonpharmacologic approach should be considered part of the clinical management of dementia.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of the Tailored Activity Program (TAP) for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study of a two-group randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients-caregiver dyads randomized to intervention or wait-list control. SETTING: Participants' homes in Philadelphia region. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers were aged ≥21 years, lived with patients, and provided ≥4 hours of daily care. Patients had moderate dementia and behavioral symptoms INTERVENTION: Eight sessions of occupational therapy over 4 months to identify patients' preserved capabilities, previous roles, habits and interests, develop customized activities, and train families in their use. MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) expressed as the cost to bring about one additional unit of benefit measured by caregiver hours per day "doing things" and hours per day "being on duty." Decision tree and Monte Carlo analyses tested robustness of the economic models. RESULTS: Total average intervention cost was $941.63 per day. Intervention caregivers saved one extra hour per day "doing things" at a cost of $2.37/day and one extra hour per day "being on duty" at a cost of $1.10/day. Monte Carlo showed that TAP was cost-effective 79.2% of the time for "doing things" and 79.6% of the time for "being on duty." Varying the cost assumptions did not change cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that investment in TAP is cost-effective and afforded families an important, limited and highly valued resource, needed time off from caregiving. This nonpharmacologic approach should be considered part of the clinical management of dementia.

KW - Behavioral symptoms

KW - Caregivers

KW - Dementia care

KW - Quality of life

KW - Willingness to pay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952798982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952798982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c37d13

DO - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c37d13

M3 - Article

C2 - 20847903

AN - SCOPUS:77952798982

VL - 18

SP - 510

EP - 519

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

IS - 6

ER -