TY - JOUR
T1 - The COPEWELL rubric
T2 - A self-assessment toolkit to strengthen community resilience to disasters
AU - Schoch-Spana, Monica
AU - Gill, Kimberly
AU - Hosangadi, Divya
AU - Slemp, Cathy
AU - Burhans, Robert
AU - Zeis, Janet
AU - Carbone, Eric G.
AU - Links, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) research contract 2017-N-66654. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: Authors M.S.-S., K.G., D.H., C.S., R.B., J.Z., and J.L. declare no conflict of interest. This project was funded by the CDC. The CDC project officer, E.C.G., is a scientist with interest and expertise in the area of this work. Accordingly, he was involved in the design of the project, the interpretation of data, and provided feedback on the manuscript. While E.C.G. had no role personally in the decision to publish the results, per CDC policy, the paper was reviewed through CDC’s Scientific Clearance process to assure scientific quality.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Measurement is a community endeavor that can enhance the ability to anticipate, withstand, and recover from a disaster, as well as foster learning and adaptation. This project’s purpose was to develop a self-assessment toolkit—manifesting a bottom-up, participatory approach—that enables people to envision community resilience as a concrete, desirable, and obtainable goal; organize a cross-sector effort to evaluate and enhance factors that influence resilience; and spur adoption of interventions that, in a disaster, would lessen impacts, preserve community functioning, and prompt a more rapid recovery. In 2016–2018, we engaged in a process of literature review, instrument development, stakeholder engagement, and local field-testing, to produce a self-assessment toolkit (or “rubric”) built on the Composite of Post-Event Well-being (COPEWELL) model that predicts post-disaster community functioning and resilience. Co-developing the rubric with community-based users, we generated self-assessment instruments and process guides that localities can more readily absorb and adapt. Applied in three field tests, the Social Capital and Cohesion materials equip users to assess this domain at different geo-scales. Chronicling the rubric’s implementation, this account sheds further light on tensions between community resilience assessment research and practice, and potential reasons why few of the many current measurement systems have been applied.
AB - Measurement is a community endeavor that can enhance the ability to anticipate, withstand, and recover from a disaster, as well as foster learning and adaptation. This project’s purpose was to develop a self-assessment toolkit—manifesting a bottom-up, participatory approach—that enables people to envision community resilience as a concrete, desirable, and obtainable goal; organize a cross-sector effort to evaluate and enhance factors that influence resilience; and spur adoption of interventions that, in a disaster, would lessen impacts, preserve community functioning, and prompt a more rapid recovery. In 2016–2018, we engaged in a process of literature review, instrument development, stakeholder engagement, and local field-testing, to produce a self-assessment toolkit (or “rubric”) built on the Composite of Post-Event Well-being (COPEWELL) model that predicts post-disaster community functioning and resilience. Co-developing the rubric with community-based users, we generated self-assessment instruments and process guides that localities can more readily absorb and adapt. Applied in three field tests, the Social Capital and Cohesion materials equip users to assess this domain at different geo-scales. Chronicling the rubric’s implementation, this account sheds further light on tensions between community resilience assessment research and practice, and potential reasons why few of the many current measurement systems have been applied.
KW - Assessment
KW - Community resilience
KW - Disaster
KW - Measurement
KW - Social capital
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069267510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069267510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16132372
DO - 10.3390/ijerph16132372
M3 - Article
C2 - 31277357
AN - SCOPUS:85069267510
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 16
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 13
M1 - 2372
ER -