The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix

John A. Rock, Sue Ellen Carpenter, Clifford R. Wheeless, Howard W. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To outline the anatomical variations of malformations of the uterine cavity and to discuss the clinical management of cervical agenesis and dysgenesis. Design: Patients who were treated for cervical malformations during a 55-year interval are reviewed and followed prospectively. The diagnosis of cervical agenesis or dysgenesis is assigned at the time of exploratory laparotomy. Setting: Hospital based tertiary care reproductive endocrine-infertility units. Main Outcome Measures: All surgical findings were carefully reviewed to determine the anatomical characteristics of the malformed cervix. When cervical reconstruction was performed, the patient was followed to determine the need for reoperation or if the patient achieved a pregnancy. Results: Patients were found to lack a cervix (cervical agenesis) or to have one of three variants of cervical dysgenesis. Patients with cervical dysgenesis were characterized as having 1) an intact cervical body with obstruction of the cervical os, 2) a cervical body consisting of a fibrous band, or 3) cervical fragmentation. One patient conceived after reconstruction. Reoperation was less likely to occur among women who had an obstructed endocervical canal but an otherwise normal cervical body. Conclusions: There are two basic types of anatomic congenital cervical malformations, the second of which may be considered as three distinct variations. The weight of the international clinical experience suggests that women with cervical agenesis or fragmentation should receive hysterectomy, whereas women with cervical dysgenesis may benefit from a reconstruction operation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-133
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pelvic Surgery
Volume1
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Cervix Uteri
Reoperation
Tertiary Healthcare
Hysterectomy
Laparotomy
Infertility
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Weights and Measures
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Rock, J. A., Carpenter, S. E., Wheeless, C. R., & Jones, H. W. (1995). The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix. Journal of Pelvic Surgery, 1(3), 129-133.

The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix. / Rock, John A.; Carpenter, Sue Ellen; Wheeless, Clifford R.; Jones, Howard W.

In: Journal of Pelvic Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1995, p. 129-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rock, JA, Carpenter, SE, Wheeless, CR & Jones, HW 1995, 'The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix', Journal of Pelvic Surgery, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 129-133.
Rock, John A. ; Carpenter, Sue Ellen ; Wheeless, Clifford R. ; Jones, Howard W. / The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix. In: Journal of Pelvic Surgery. 1995 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 129-133.
@article{ffa1066c0ad541bdab6ab1cad49b68a5,
title = "The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix",
abstract = "Objectives: To outline the anatomical variations of malformations of the uterine cavity and to discuss the clinical management of cervical agenesis and dysgenesis. Design: Patients who were treated for cervical malformations during a 55-year interval are reviewed and followed prospectively. The diagnosis of cervical agenesis or dysgenesis is assigned at the time of exploratory laparotomy. Setting: Hospital based tertiary care reproductive endocrine-infertility units. Main Outcome Measures: All surgical findings were carefully reviewed to determine the anatomical characteristics of the malformed cervix. When cervical reconstruction was performed, the patient was followed to determine the need for reoperation or if the patient achieved a pregnancy. Results: Patients were found to lack a cervix (cervical agenesis) or to have one of three variants of cervical dysgenesis. Patients with cervical dysgenesis were characterized as having 1) an intact cervical body with obstruction of the cervical os, 2) a cervical body consisting of a fibrous band, or 3) cervical fragmentation. One patient conceived after reconstruction. Reoperation was less likely to occur among women who had an obstructed endocervical canal but an otherwise normal cervical body. Conclusions: There are two basic types of anatomic congenital cervical malformations, the second of which may be considered as three distinct variations. The weight of the international clinical experience suggests that women with cervical agenesis or fragmentation should receive hysterectomy, whereas women with cervical dysgenesis may benefit from a reconstruction operation.",
author = "Rock, {John A.} and Carpenter, {Sue Ellen} and Wheeless, {Clifford R.} and Jones, {Howard W.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "129--133",
journal = "Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix

AU - Rock, John A.

AU - Carpenter, Sue Ellen

AU - Wheeless, Clifford R.

AU - Jones, Howard W.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Objectives: To outline the anatomical variations of malformations of the uterine cavity and to discuss the clinical management of cervical agenesis and dysgenesis. Design: Patients who were treated for cervical malformations during a 55-year interval are reviewed and followed prospectively. The diagnosis of cervical agenesis or dysgenesis is assigned at the time of exploratory laparotomy. Setting: Hospital based tertiary care reproductive endocrine-infertility units. Main Outcome Measures: All surgical findings were carefully reviewed to determine the anatomical characteristics of the malformed cervix. When cervical reconstruction was performed, the patient was followed to determine the need for reoperation or if the patient achieved a pregnancy. Results: Patients were found to lack a cervix (cervical agenesis) or to have one of three variants of cervical dysgenesis. Patients with cervical dysgenesis were characterized as having 1) an intact cervical body with obstruction of the cervical os, 2) a cervical body consisting of a fibrous band, or 3) cervical fragmentation. One patient conceived after reconstruction. Reoperation was less likely to occur among women who had an obstructed endocervical canal but an otherwise normal cervical body. Conclusions: There are two basic types of anatomic congenital cervical malformations, the second of which may be considered as three distinct variations. The weight of the international clinical experience suggests that women with cervical agenesis or fragmentation should receive hysterectomy, whereas women with cervical dysgenesis may benefit from a reconstruction operation.

AB - Objectives: To outline the anatomical variations of malformations of the uterine cavity and to discuss the clinical management of cervical agenesis and dysgenesis. Design: Patients who were treated for cervical malformations during a 55-year interval are reviewed and followed prospectively. The diagnosis of cervical agenesis or dysgenesis is assigned at the time of exploratory laparotomy. Setting: Hospital based tertiary care reproductive endocrine-infertility units. Main Outcome Measures: All surgical findings were carefully reviewed to determine the anatomical characteristics of the malformed cervix. When cervical reconstruction was performed, the patient was followed to determine the need for reoperation or if the patient achieved a pregnancy. Results: Patients were found to lack a cervix (cervical agenesis) or to have one of three variants of cervical dysgenesis. Patients with cervical dysgenesis were characterized as having 1) an intact cervical body with obstruction of the cervical os, 2) a cervical body consisting of a fibrous band, or 3) cervical fragmentation. One patient conceived after reconstruction. Reoperation was less likely to occur among women who had an obstructed endocervical canal but an otherwise normal cervical body. Conclusions: There are two basic types of anatomic congenital cervical malformations, the second of which may be considered as three distinct variations. The weight of the international clinical experience suggests that women with cervical agenesis or fragmentation should receive hysterectomy, whereas women with cervical dysgenesis may benefit from a reconstruction operation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002161904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002161904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002161904

VL - 1

SP - 129

EP - 133

JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 2151-8378

IS - 3

ER -